Homepage Garage Wiki Register Community Calendar Today's Posts Search
#Camaro6
Go Back   CAMARO6 > Members Area > General Automotive + Other Cars Discussion


Phastek Performance


Post Reply
 
Thread Tools
Old 07-28-2012, 07:32 AM   #113
cbass

 
Drives: .
Join Date: Mar 2012
Location: Phoenix
Posts: 1,017
Quote:
Originally Posted by Dr. Evil View Post
I did add in the price of the RS package. Heck, I stopped to look at a couple of stangs today at a local dealership. They had 2, a silver one for $38,xxx and a black one for 39,xxx. Neither one had the track packs and such. Dont you also have to add that to get Brembo brakes? (standard on an SS). The 2012 SS get the FE4 suspension which improves handling over the 10 and 11 models. I'm just comparing the base models and not going into the whole Boss, Laguna Seca and 1LE additions but since you brought that up a new 2013 1LE can easily be had for under $40k with the RS package. Whats the cheapest LS stang you can get?
The stang is cheaper by 5-7K. I have priced them multiple times. MSRP between the camaro 1SS 1LE and mustang GT with track pack is almost $3500 cheaper. Ford also has higher markup on their cars so you can take double off to get to Invoice. Then the mustang comes with incentives while the camaro does not. This doesn't even take into consideration the HID's which are standard on the mustang, but cost $1350 on the camaro.
cbass is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 07-28-2012, 07:44 AM   #114
SEVEN-OH JOE
Account Suspended
 
Drives: some to distraction
Join Date: Sep 2011
Location: Location: Location:
Posts: 627
Worthwhile Things About The Mustang Debate @ camaro5:

A)
SEVEN-OH JOE is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 07-28-2012, 09:29 AM   #115
derklug

 
derklug's Avatar
 
Drives: 12 Boss 302
Join Date: Sep 2009
Location: Grand Rapids, Mi
Posts: 1,369
Quote:
Originally Posted by SEVEN-OH JOE View Post
A)
Drives up your post count.
__________________
The biggest mistakes in life come when you know exactly what you are doing.
derklug is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 07-28-2012, 10:25 AM   #116
GrabberB5.Slow
 
GrabberB5.Slow's Avatar
 
Drives: 2011 Grabber Blue Mustang GT
Join Date: Jun 2012
Location: Martinsburg, WV
Posts: 126
Quote:
Originally Posted by cbass View Post
The stang is cheaper by 5-7K. I have priced them multiple times. MSRP between the camaro 1SS 1LE and mustang GT with track pack is almost $3500 cheaper. Ford also has higher markup on their cars so you can take double off to get to Invoice. Then the mustang comes with incentives while the camaro does not. This doesn't even take into consideration the HID's which are standard on the mustang, but cost $1350 on the camaro.
^^ This guys on target. Half the reason why I didn't buy a camaro is because of the price difference. I looked and looked cause if I was going to get a Camaro I wanted Leather, MT, HIDs, and White. All of them in the area were like $37 - $38 which I couldn't afford at the time.

So I just said the hell with it and got X plan and $3k worth of incentives for $28,100 out the door on a GT Premium.
__________________
GrabberB5.Slow is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 07-29-2012, 04:42 PM   #117
bigjohns97
 
Drives: 2011 5.0
Join Date: Oct 2008
Location: Pearland, TX
Posts: 57
Quote:
Originally Posted by cbass View Post
I have a lot of respect for the new coyote motor and the technology put in it and the top end power it takes out of 5.0, but you see the advantage of the LS3's extra 1.2L throughout the power range.


More power through most of the rpm range with essentially the same peak hp output just at lower rpm. So 2 valves per cylinder vs 4 valves per cylinder. No VVT vs VVT. Essentially the same fuel economy from an extra 1.2L and the motor is slightly lighter than the coyote.



Pretty much identical results achieved by LG motorsports to have a different data point:



When it comes to motors I think the LS3 still takes it, but I think the mustang platform is better. It was built for the mustang instead of using a full size sedan platform.
Spot on brother.. I'm impressed.

The really fun thing is what will happen in the future when camaro moves to an ats platform (still a sedan but much smaller) and the mustang to an IRS.

Not to mention the gen V chevy SB that should come with the new camaro with supposed cam changes and possibly more control over intake and exhaust valves independently.

Can't wait to see how it all pans out.
bigjohns97 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 07-29-2012, 07:25 PM   #118
ChrisBlair
Buick 455 Fan
 
Drives: 1970 Buick, 2012 1SS LS3
Join Date: Jun 2010
Location: Boston MA
Posts: 5,957
Quote:
Originally Posted by 11fastss View Post
I haven't been a member of this forum very long, but does anyone else find it annoying to have "5.0" owners bashing our cars, I guess we could go around saying that we drive a "6.2", I don't understand why ford is so proud of an engine that produces less torque, the mustang is just lighter plain and simple this is why it can even stay with the ss. STOCK for STOCK
Even when it was new, it was really a 4.9 anyway. Meh
__________________
ChrisBlair is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 07-29-2012, 09:19 PM   #119
cbass

 
Drives: .
Join Date: Mar 2012
Location: Phoenix
Posts: 1,017
Quote:
Originally Posted by GrabberB5.Slow View Post
^^ This guys on target. Half the reason why I didn't buy a camaro is because of the price difference. I looked and looked cause if I was going to get a Camaro I wanted Leather, MT, HIDs, and White. All of them in the area were like $37 - $38 which I couldn't afford at the time.

So I just said the hell with it and got X plan and $3k worth of incentives for $28,100 out the door on a GT Premium.
Personally, for $1350 I would like to see a lot more out of the RS package than the HIDs. Why not also put in LED fog lights and LED tail lamps?
cbass is offline   Reply With Quote
Post Reply


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump


All times are GMT -5. The time now is 01:59 AM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.9 Beta 4
Copyright ©2000 - 2026, vBulletin Solutions, Inc.