Homepage Garage Wiki Register Community Calendar Today's Posts Search
#Camaro6
Go Back   CAMARO6 > Engine | Drivetrain | Powertrain Technical Discussions > Forced Induction Discussions


Griffin Motorsports


Post Reply
 
Thread Tools
Old 04-08-2017, 07:14 AM   #15
JoeAyalaM
Account Suspended
 
Drives: Audi S6 V8TT, Volvos XC60 & S60R
Join Date: Feb 2016
Location: 5000 ft above sea level.
Posts: 414
Quote:
Originally Posted by My87z28 View Post
On regular 93 octane 600rwhp is very possible. It's been those who have switched to E85 that are having issues at 600rwhp. Remember that E85 burns about 30% more than 93 octane. I'd also have to say that obviously a 2.9L Whipple will make more power at any boost level than a 2.3L maggie PD charger.
Is that Crack good enough?
JoeAyalaM is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 04-08-2017, 10:40 AM   #16
Slowhawk
 
Drives: 1999 Trans Am
Join Date: Jul 2009
Location: Bridgewater,Ma
Posts: 2,018
I see stock fuel system limitations at 550-560 on my dyno too. The shop listed has a happy dyno,then with no load on it probably wouldn't see a fuel issue.
Slowhawk is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 04-08-2017, 11:09 AM   #17
brettman

 
Drives: 2016 Camaro SS
Join Date: Mar 2017
Location: Cleveland, Ohio
Posts: 912
Quote:
Originally Posted by Slowhawk View Post
I see stock fuel system limitations at 550-560 on my dyno too. The shop listed has a happy dyno,then with no load on it probably wouldn't see a fuel issue.
What does your Camaro say on the dyno??
brettman is offline   Reply With Quote
 
Post Reply


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump


All times are GMT -5. The time now is 01:46 AM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.9 Beta 4
Copyright ©2000 - 2026, vBulletin Solutions, Inc.