|
|
#309 | |
|
Banned
Drives: Mustang GT Join Date: Aug 2017
Location: Miami
Posts: 237
|
Quote:
As far as "completely rebuild it", I haven't rebuilt anything yet, don't plan to in the near future either, it's still in mostly stock and very reliable getting 22ish mpg on the highway with power to go around on crappy 93 oct, imagine the tears on E85 and a converter on still stock motor/trans/driveshaft/diff/axles/suspension..
Last edited by Sol4rfl4re; 10-08-2017 at 09:25 AM. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
#310 | |
|
Banned
Drives: 2012 2SS INFERNO ORANGE Join Date: Apr 2015
Location: sweden
Posts: 1,841
|
Quote:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
#311 |
|
Banned
Drives: 2012 2SS INFERNO ORANGE Join Date: Apr 2015
Location: sweden
Posts: 1,841
|
i mean who in their right minds will buy a car based on a car with soooo many problems.
the list of issues cropping up with the s550 is scary.. anyway the 5.0 coyote is a junk motor..weak as hell untill u wring it's neck..the 6.2 litre lt1 motor is so damn easy to drive..bags of lovely torque. plus a pushrod motor is way easier to repair and tune..twin ohc ect is ok untill something goes wrong..then it's huge repair costs. |
|
|
|
|
|
#312 | |
|
Banned
Drives: Mustang GT Join Date: Aug 2017
Location: Miami
Posts: 237
|
Quote:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
#313 |
|
Banned
Drives: 2012 2SS INFERNO ORANGE Join Date: Apr 2015
Location: sweden
Posts: 1,841
|
no idea but common sense tells u a simple pushrod motor has to be easier to work on
|
|
|
|
|
|
#314 |
|
Banned
Drives: Mustang GT Join Date: Aug 2017
Location: Miami
Posts: 237
|
Ls motors were quite simple, lt motors not quite as easy. Cam swap on ls is considered by many a not so difficult job but on the lt is costs quite a bit. You never ready modded your mustangs to compare so you're assuming. My car has never been dyno tuned at over 600hp, all tuning done via a lap top/PC. Not saying the LT isn't as flexible, I just haven't looked into it enough. But is isn't as simple black and white as you say.
|
|
|
|
|
|
#315 | |
|
Banned
Drives: 2013 GB GT Join Date: Mar 2016
Location: Florida
Posts: 954
|
Quote:
Now the LT1 has the benefit of DI which the gen3 Coyote will share so it will be interesting to see the disparity once the playing field is level. I suspect it will be in the same 30-40ft/lb range |
|
|
|
|
|
|
#316 |
|
Banned
Drives: Mustang GT Join Date: Aug 2017
Location: Miami
Posts: 237
|
LT1 455/455
Gen 3 coyote 460/420 |
|
|
|
|
|
#317 |
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() Drives: 14 Silverado LTZ Z71, 16 Camaro SS Join Date: Nov 2009
Location: Jackson, Michigan
Posts: 4,423
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
#318 | |
![]() ![]() Drives: 2017 2SS M6 Join Date: Apr 2017
Location: Billings MT
Posts: 773
|
Quote:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
#319 | |
|
Banned
Drives: 2013 GB GT Join Date: Mar 2016
Location: Florida
Posts: 954
|
Quote:
torque in the equation. the extra torque is nice if you're lugging the motor, but there are just too many factors at play in determining maximum acceleration |
|
|
|
|
|
|
#320 | |
![]() ![]() Drives: 2017 2SS M6 Join Date: Apr 2017
Location: Billings MT
Posts: 773
|
Quote:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
#321 |
|
Banned
Drives: Mustang GT Join Date: Aug 2017
Location: Miami
Posts: 237
|
coyote isnt about torque, its much like the honda motors, short stroke high revs. manifolds gain a decent amount on coyotes for this reason, you add 1000-1200rpms of powerband. If you're a bad driver on a manual coyote you will hate life because the more you let the revs drop between shifts the slower you go. Good drivers are quite successful on NA coyotes because of this reason.
|
|
|
|
|
|
#322 | |||||
|
Account Suspended
Drives: 2017 Camaro ZL1 A10 Join Date: May 2012
Location: NJ
Posts: 7,692
|
Quote:
Quote:
Quote:
Quote:
Quote:
|
|||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Post Reply
|
|
|