|
|
#323 | |
![]() Drives: 2014 2SS/RS/1LE Join Date: Mar 2015
Location: Hurricane Alley
Posts: 700
|
Quote:
http://www.conceptcarz.com/z26672/Ch...X-Concept.aspx
__________________
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
#324 | |
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() Drives: '17 Camaro 2SS & '99 Camaro Z28 Join Date: Feb 2014
Location: Austin, TX
Posts: 1,975
|
Quote:
You've been knocking on the V6 with absolutely no legitimacy throughout the entire thread looking for every single reason you could to bash it with quite a good few of them being severely inflated or overly exaggerated. You're paying more than 16% to own the SS as well. There's more to financing a car than the actual car note. You also have Insurance (will cost more for an SS than V6), and maintenance of which SS's eat tires every year. If you live in the Southeast then there is also fuel as Premium fuel down here costs nearly $1 more per gallon than 87 octane, thats not the case in the Pacific states but it is here. Thats all dandy if thats what you want to pay for, I don't care - its not something I would do as I have other financial obligations and thats what I am stating. There are more reason's people choose the V6's other than performance and other people have higher financial priorities in their life other than a fast set of four wheels and some of them still want a sports car as a DD but don't really care to have 455 HP, they just want something fun.. and throughout this entire thread you have been making something competitive out of something completely non-competitive as not a single V6 owner here has been attempting compete on a performance level.. they just enjoy their car and respect it for what it is.. same for your car.. if thats what you want to spend the money on thats fine. I've had faster cars than my V6, (04 Vette, 01 Z28, 99 Z28, ect) I know its not the quickest thing in the world but by no means does it disqualify it as a candidate of choice for a DD.. it's pretty dang fun for what it is. Myself and several others are not looking for a $40,000 track toy.. they just want a fun coupe to get them to work and back and thats the intension of the V6. If we start now talking about "used prices" of an SS, please be mindful that a V6 can be had used for right at $20k .. you're not getting an SS at that price..yet... You can't really compare the two cars.. they're intended for two different markets. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
#325 | |
![]() Drives: 2016 Camaro 2SS M6 Join Date: Jan 2017
Location: Panama City, FL
Posts: 217
|
Quote:
Look, I think Ford had the right idea in making the turbo 4 cylinder the mid-level trim. They can sound pretty good and they can make power for CHEAP! It is truly the best bang for your buck. Period. V8 is for when you want that power stock, or you want to mod and go stupid fast (2Gs of lateral acceleration is FUN!). The V6 is as expensive, if not more (DOHC), to mod and therefore this seems more like an attempt to circle jerk the V6 for some reason (if you're going to mod the car). The future will probably consist of a Camaro offered with four powertrains though: turbo 4 cylinder, twin turbo V6, hybrid twin turbo V6 (AWD), and then an all electric plug-in of some type--which would be faster than the Tesla Model S P100D models. Personally, I want that 4 motor AWD electric Camaro. Less attention from the police, but with WAY more power. And traction issues? What's that?
__________________
‘16 Camaro 2SS M6 - RotoFab CAI, Soler Performance TB, E85
8.102 @ 89.85 MPH (bone stock) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
#326 |
![]() Drives: 1LT 1LE Join Date: Aug 2017
Location: Pennsylvania
Posts: 41
|
From Car & Drivers Lightening Lap comparing the V6 1le with your turbo 4 claims:
"...it absolutely stomps its current Blue Oval rival, the Mustang EcoBoost equipped with the Performance package. Were they on the track at the same time, the boosted Mustang would only be exiting Hog Pen onto the front straight as the Camaro crossed the start/finish line at 3:04. The Ford needs an additional 11.6 seconds to complete its lap." |
|
|
|
|
|
#327 |
![]() Drives: 1LT 1LE Join Date: Aug 2017
Location: Pennsylvania
Posts: 41
|
It's possible to just buy turbos for any engine / car. You would need a tune & I'd absolutely recommend intercoolers. The LGX runs 11.5:1 compression. A small amount of boost will add a lot @ that compression. If you do it go ewg not iwg turbos to avoid boost creep.
If you look at Jay Leno's garage he forwent a V8 fifth Gen Camaro & went V6 & twin turbo charged it due it better balance / weight distribution & lower weight all together. |
|
|
|
|
|
#328 | |
![]() Drives: 2016 Camaro 2SS M6 Join Date: Jan 2017
Location: Panama City, FL
Posts: 217
|
Quote:
__________________
‘16 Camaro 2SS M6 - RotoFab CAI, Soler Performance TB, E85
8.102 @ 89.85 MPH (bone stock) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
#329 |
![]() Drives: 1LT 1LE Join Date: Aug 2017
Location: Pennsylvania
Posts: 41
|
Here's a turn key super charger kit for the LGX - 400hp
http://teamrxp.com/products/2016-201...percharger-kit |
|
|
|
|
|
#330 |
![]() Drives: 1LT 1LE Join Date: Aug 2017
Location: Pennsylvania
Posts: 41
|
I really think you missed this.
& Modding the LGX is no more expensive than the turbo 4. ~Sincerely an Engineer QUOTE=stigmacher;9891344]From Car & Drivers Lightening Lap comparing the V6 1le with your turbo 4 claims: "...it absolutely stomps its current Blue Oval rival, the Mustang EcoBoost equipped with the Performance package. Were they on the track at the same time, the boosted Mustang would only be exiting Hog Pen onto the front straight as the Camaro crossed the start/finish line at 3:04. The Ford needs an additional 11.6 seconds to complete its lap."[/QUOTE] |
|
|
|
|
|
#331 |
![]() Drives: 1LT 1LE Join Date: Aug 2017
Location: Pennsylvania
Posts: 41
|
Here's the VIR lightening lap times:
V6 1le = 3:04.0 2015 WRX STI = 3:10.5 STI is boosted out AWD four banger with adjustable torque to front & rear - a lot of kit. Good luck with the cost modding a 2.0t to that level of dynamics. & PS: If your wondering the turbo 4 Evo 10 with all it's AWD tricks is even slower. |
|
|
|
|
|
#332 |
![]() ![]() ![]() Drives: 02 Camaro SS 6M / 11 GMC Sierra Join Date: Mar 2017
Location: Pickering, Ontario, Canada
Posts: 1,096
|
There's no doubt the LGX is a ridiculously amazing engine in the V6 Camaro is fully proof of that it is a beast.
|
|
|
|
|
|
#333 | |
![]() ![]() ![]() Drives: 02 Camaro SS 6M / 11 GMC Sierra Join Date: Mar 2017
Location: Pickering, Ontario, Canada
Posts: 1,096
|
Quote:
And if you did spend the extra money on the V8 I do truly hope you use that power and not just use it for bragging rights find your local track go to it get your money's worth |
|
|
|
|
|
|
#334 | |
![]() Drives: 2016 Camaro 2SS M6 Join Date: Jan 2017
Location: Panama City, FL
Posts: 217
|
Quote:
$6,500 to get a V6 to 400whp...why not just get the SS? You V6 owners are in denial. This argument isn't even about V6 vs. SS anymore...it's why would anyone want a V6 over a turbo 4?!
__________________
‘16 Camaro 2SS M6 - RotoFab CAI, Soler Performance TB, E85
8.102 @ 89.85 MPH (bone stock) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
#335 | |
|
Retired from Car mfrs....
Drives: 2LT RS/HR-V Join Date: May 2013
Location: /Fort Lauderdale
Posts: 10,044
|
Quote:
Risky, I know you don't understand this point of view; But as been said before in many cases above, I don't care at all about horsepower, once it is a respectable amount. The Camaro V6 FEELS about as fast as my 335, And that was fine with me. I would take the V6 all day over the four for one reason; Refinement. To me it is a smoother delivery of power than the four. But if you are a horse power enthusiast, yes, the four and the 8 make much more sense. But to me V-6 is a different direction altogether..... |
|
|
|
|
|
|
#336 | |
![]() ![]() ![]() Drives: 02 Camaro SS 6M / 11 GMC Sierra Join Date: Mar 2017
Location: Pickering, Ontario, Canada
Posts: 1,096
|
Quote:
I would say at least 80 to 90% of guys do not mod their cars I'm a guy that does just do basic intakes and exhausts throttle bodies stuff like that but I'm not a guy that's going to be doing cams. So for the guy that's not going to mod risky Justice the V6 is a damn fine automobile faster than 90% of the cars on the road and it is bulletproof reliable so far. Let's admit now to this car is no longer a muscle car is a sports car it handles crazy and the V6 with the NPP sounds like an exotic sports car I know you can't get that into your head risky exotic think about how cool that is to have a Camaro that sounds like an exotic So with mods you can up I-4 to 400 horse or more but you have no warranty left. I know I could not just go ahead and void the warranty on my car that I just bought brand new that would be just crazy people like to have brand new cars because of warranties MrJustice. I don't know if your new to having powerful cars oryou don't understand that the LG X can run with an LS1 Camaro or you're bored or you just like talking smack. But my God are you talking a lot of smack the V6 is fantastic man go mod your V8 if you're not happy with it man. And let's not forget that the V6 is lighter in the front end in the V8 and I would go as far to say it is a better handling vehicle. And I would also be man enough to say that the I-4 would be better handling in the V6. Weight matters in a vehicle The reality is man the V8 is nice to have if you're some old guy that's going to keep it in the garage and brag but it's complete Overkill on the street as a daily driver. That's a lot of normal guys that just bought the V8 to that are in here shaking their fingers at anybody who didnt buy one You got to stop doing that risky Justice it's not needed it's ridiculous. It's not going to kill you the fact that the LG xv6 is just the best V6 ever made you can accept that and move on with your life we've all made choices you've also got the fastest V8 ever in a Camaro that's some pretty good choices man but I've got the fastest V6. I do invite you to use YouTube and Google and review the V6 Camaro though because everyone who drove it loved it and then spend some time and read about the LG X and how it won Ward's 10 best and how they had to keep on stopping the cars popping the hoods of the Camaros just to tell if it was a V6 or V8 they were driving Last edited by IMadeYouReadThis; 09-02-2017 at 01:32 PM. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Post Reply
|
|
|