Homepage Garage Wiki Register Community Calendar Today's Posts Search
#Camaro6
Go Back   CAMARO6 > CAMARO6.com General Forums > ZL1 Discussions


BeckyD @ James Martin Chevy


Post Reply
 
Thread Tools
Old 01-22-2017, 10:54 PM   #99
Zeke.Malvo

 
Zeke.Malvo's Avatar
 
Drives: 1969 Mustang MaCh1
Join Date: Nov 2015
Location: SJ
Posts: 835
Quote:
Originally Posted by Mr. Wyndham View Post
They did something not quite right with the EPA tests on that car. I forget what it was, so I can't back it up, and won't try...but I remember being told by someone who'd know that they, essentially, cooked the books.
Manufacturers can do some sneaky things. I can definitely see that, the same as when they send pre-production vehicles to the ring for unverifiable runs, or send magazines hopped up cars that are also unverifiable.
__________________
1969 Pro-Touring MaCh 1 - CHP 427w 10.8 comp - 3140 lbs. - 460 rwhp / 490 rwtq
T56 Magnum || 14" 6 piston front / 13" 4 piston rear Wilwood brakes || Hydraulic clutch || 9" Detroit Locker || TCP Coilovers || Forgeline Wheels 18x10 275/35 front, 19x12 325/30 rear
Zeke.Malvo is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 01-23-2017, 09:07 AM   #100
Mr. Wyndham
I used to be Dragoneye...
 
Mr. Wyndham's Avatar
 
Drives: 2018 ZL1 1LE
Join Date: Jan 2007
Location: Buffalo, NY
Posts: 31,873
Send a message via AIM to Mr. Wyndham
Quote:
Originally Posted by Zeke.Malvo View Post
Manufacturers can do some sneaky things. I can definitely see that, the same as when they send pre-production vehicles to the ring for unverifiable runs, or send magazines hopped up cars that are also unverifiable.
With the EPA, it doesn't take much. There are many loopholes.

For example...the Japanese makes for decades were providing misrepresented Cd figures for the conversion calculations to take lab-results mpg numbers to "real-world". This resulted in higher-than-normal fuel economy numbers that weren't real. Several faced law suits, and some had to pay our reparations to customers for misrepresenting FE.

Or...packages and options don't usually get tested. A 1LE does not get the same FE as the base SS...stickier tires, more drag, etc...but the EPA doesn't test the option package in the lab.

And...contrary to popular belief...not ALL car models get tested for FE. Only new, or significantly updated models get pulled in. There's a fleet percentage that the EPA is responsible for testing. The rest is taken on faith from the manufacturer.

So.....EPA figures are generally accurate, and it's a solid, standardized way of figuring fuel economy numbers. But like every system, there are ways to cheat it.
__________________
"Keep the faith." - Fbodfather
Mr. Wyndham is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 01-23-2017, 04:43 PM   #101
Zeke.Malvo

 
Zeke.Malvo's Avatar
 
Drives: 1969 Mustang MaCh1
Join Date: Nov 2015
Location: SJ
Posts: 835
Quote:
Originally Posted by Mr. Wyndham View Post
With the EPA, it doesn't take much. There are many loopholes.

For example...the Japanese makes for decades were providing misrepresented Cd figures for the conversion calculations to take lab-results mpg numbers to "real-world". This resulted in higher-than-normal fuel economy numbers that weren't real. Several faced law suits, and some had to pay our reparations to customers for misrepresenting FE.

Or...packages and options don't usually get tested. A 1LE does not get the same FE as the base SS...stickier tires, more drag, etc...but the EPA doesn't test the option package in the lab.

And...contrary to popular belief...not ALL car models get tested for FE. Only new, or significantly updated models get pulled in. There's a fleet percentage that the EPA is responsible for testing. The rest is taken on faith from the manufacturer.

So.....EPA figures are generally accurate, and it's a solid, standardized way of figuring fuel economy numbers. But like every system, there are ways to cheat it.
I agree, the EPA is easy to cheat. And a magazine performance and manufacturer ring time is even easier.. there are ZERO loopholes to even consider.
__________________
1969 Pro-Touring MaCh 1 - CHP 427w 10.8 comp - 3140 lbs. - 460 rwhp / 490 rwtq
T56 Magnum || 14" 6 piston front / 13" 4 piston rear Wilwood brakes || Hydraulic clutch || 9" Detroit Locker || TCP Coilovers || Forgeline Wheels 18x10 275/35 front, 19x12 325/30 rear
Zeke.Malvo is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 02-18-2017, 04:49 AM   #102
84camaroz28
 
Drives: 84 camaro z28 422sb th400 9in
Join Date: Feb 2017
Location: Maine
Posts: 21
Gas guzzler tax

Why is do they charge $1,300 gas guzzler tax on the 6 speeds and $2,100 for the A10's? Autos worse on fuel?
84camaroz28 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 02-18-2017, 05:48 AM   #103
mlee
CamaroFans.com
 
mlee's Avatar
 
Drives: ZLE & ZR2
Join Date: Oct 2008
Location: Conroe, TX
Posts: 37,982
Quote:
Originally Posted by 84camaroz28 View Post
Why is do they charge $1,300 gas guzzler tax on the 6 speeds and $2,100 for the A10's? Autos worse on fuel?
Autos are almost always worse on fuel
__________________
mlee is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 02-18-2017, 07:17 AM   #104
HyperBlueX2


 
Drives: '22 Silverado 2500HD Duramax LTZ
Join Date: Dec 2015
Location: Millington, MI
Posts: 4,775
The A10 has a much steeper 1st and 2nd gear.... kills the city and combined number......
HyperBlueX2 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 02-18-2017, 08:00 AM   #105
Zack46


 
Zack46's Avatar
 
Drives: 2018 2SS Camaro Hot Wheels Edition
Join Date: Sep 2015
Location: Cleveland, Ohio
Posts: 2,814
Quote:
Originally Posted by Hyperblue16vert View Post
The A10 has a much steeper 1st and 2nd gear.... kills the city and combined number......
__________________
Zack46

2018 Camaro 2SS Orange Crush Hot Wheels Limited Edition
Power Sunroof, 8 Speed Auto/Remote Start, NPP Exhaust
Production Sequence Number 98
NEOCC Camaro Club Member

Former Ride: 2016 Camaro 2LT RS V6 Hyper Blue Metallic
Zack46 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 02-18-2017, 09:45 AM   #106
mlee
CamaroFans.com
 
mlee's Avatar
 
Drives: ZLE & ZR2
Join Date: Oct 2008
Location: Conroe, TX
Posts: 37,982
Quote:
Originally Posted by Hyperblue16vert View Post
The A10 has a much steeper 1st and 2nd gear.... kills the city and combined number......
Thus improving those 60' times... Love it...
__________________
mlee is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 02-18-2017, 09:55 AM   #107
17ZL1
 
Drives: 2017 Nightfall Gray Metallic ZL1
Join Date: Oct 2016
Location: Georgia
Posts: 88
Quote:
Originally Posted by NB2017ZL1 View Post
Wtf? Is that to make up for the initial ones they forgot to charge ? Makes zero sense. Should be better on gas than the M6...
17ZL1 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 02-18-2017, 09:58 AM   #108
Zack46


 
Zack46's Avatar
 
Drives: 2018 2SS Camaro Hot Wheels Edition
Join Date: Sep 2015
Location: Cleveland, Ohio
Posts: 2,814
Quote:
Originally Posted by mlee View Post
Thus improving those 60' times... Love it...
__________________
Zack46

2018 Camaro 2SS Orange Crush Hot Wheels Limited Edition
Power Sunroof, 8 Speed Auto/Remote Start, NPP Exhaust
Production Sequence Number 98
NEOCC Camaro Club Member

Former Ride: 2016 Camaro 2LT RS V6 Hyper Blue Metallic
Zack46 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 02-18-2017, 11:19 AM   #109
Blown67
 
Blown67's Avatar
 
Drives: 1967 Camaro, 2017 HBM ZL1
Join Date: Dec 2016
Location: Houston, Tx
Posts: 68
What I wanna know is if we're paying a "tax", can we write that off our income taxes? The standard deduction is something like 6k I think, but on a Z you're paying around 4K just in sales tax, then there would be the GG tax, and whatever else you had throughout the year would be well over the standard limit. Gotta stick it to the man lol
Blown67 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 02-18-2017, 12:20 PM   #110
mlee
CamaroFans.com
 
mlee's Avatar
 
Drives: ZLE & ZR2
Join Date: Oct 2008
Location: Conroe, TX
Posts: 37,982
Quote:
Originally Posted by Zack46 View Post
Always have to look on the bright side..


Quote:
Originally Posted by Blown67 View Post
What I wanna know is if we're paying a "tax", can we write that off our income taxes? The standard deduction is something like 6k I think, but on a Z you're paying around 4K just in sales tax, then there would be the GG tax, and whatever else you had throughout the year would be well over the standard limit. Gotta stick it to the man lol
You can't use that as a deduction, but in a sense you are in the end because GG Tax is added into the options section and then you are taxed on it again (tax on a tax) in the final price.
__________________
mlee is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 02-18-2017, 01:40 PM   #111
396ssrat

 
Drives: 66 Chevelle SS
Join Date: Mar 2013
Location: SoCal
Posts: 1,347
Gas guzzler tax is a sham because you already pay more tax for using more gas. You just pay it each time you buy gas. That should be repealed.
396ssrat is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 02-19-2017, 09:14 AM   #112
MoreSpeed
 
MoreSpeed's Avatar
 
Drives: 2017 Hyper Blue A10 ZL1
Join Date: Dec 2016
Location: New England
Posts: 716
Quote:
Originally Posted by Zeke.Malvo View Post
Manufacturers can do some sneaky things. I can definitely see that, the same as when they send pre-production vehicles to the ring for unverifiable runs, or send magazines hopped up cars that are also unverifiable.
Manufacturers would never do that! Just ask Volkswagen.
__________________
- Life is a highway... I want to ride it all night long...


Sold 2010 997 GT3, 2016 WRX, 2006 997 C2S, 2003 996 C4S, 2001 Boxster S, 1997 E420 AMG
etc..
MoreSpeed is offline   Reply With Quote
 
Post Reply


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump


All times are GMT -5. The time now is 05:37 AM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.9 Beta 4
Copyright ©2000 - 2026, vBulletin Solutions, Inc.