|
|
#99 |
![]() ![]() Drives: 1969 Mustang MaCh1 Join Date: Nov 2015
Location: SJ
Posts: 835
|
Manufacturers can do some sneaky things. I can definitely see that, the same as when they send pre-production vehicles to the ring for unverifiable runs, or send magazines hopped up cars that are also unverifiable.
__________________
1969 Pro-Touring MaCh 1 - CHP 427w 10.8 comp - 3140 lbs. - 460 rwhp / 490 rwtqT56 Magnum || 14" 6 piston front / 13" 4 piston rear Wilwood brakes || Hydraulic clutch || 9" Detroit Locker || TCP Coilovers || Forgeline Wheels 18x10 275/35 front, 19x12 325/30 rear |
|
|
|
|
|
#100 | |
|
I used to be Dragoneye...
|
Quote:
For example...the Japanese makes for decades were providing misrepresented Cd figures for the conversion calculations to take lab-results mpg numbers to "real-world". This resulted in higher-than-normal fuel economy numbers that weren't real. Several faced law suits, and some had to pay our reparations to customers for misrepresenting FE. Or...packages and options don't usually get tested. A 1LE does not get the same FE as the base SS...stickier tires, more drag, etc...but the EPA doesn't test the option package in the lab. And...contrary to popular belief...not ALL car models get tested for FE. Only new, or significantly updated models get pulled in. There's a fleet percentage that the EPA is responsible for testing. The rest is taken on faith from the manufacturer. So.....EPA figures are generally accurate, and it's a solid, standardized way of figuring fuel economy numbers. But like every system, there are ways to cheat it. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
#101 | |
![]() ![]() Drives: 1969 Mustang MaCh1 Join Date: Nov 2015
Location: SJ
Posts: 835
|
Quote:
__________________
1969 Pro-Touring MaCh 1 - CHP 427w 10.8 comp - 3140 lbs. - 460 rwhp / 490 rwtqT56 Magnum || 14" 6 piston front / 13" 4 piston rear Wilwood brakes || Hydraulic clutch || 9" Detroit Locker || TCP Coilovers || Forgeline Wheels 18x10 275/35 front, 19x12 325/30 rear |
|
|
|
|
|
|
#102 |
![]() Drives: 84 camaro z28 422sb th400 9in Join Date: Feb 2017
Location: Maine
Posts: 21
|
Gas guzzler tax
Why is do they charge $1,300 gas guzzler tax on the 6 speeds and $2,100 for the A10's? Autos worse on fuel?
|
|
|
|
|
|
#103 |
|
CamaroFans.com
|
Autos are almost always worse on fuel
|
|
|
|
|
|
#104 |
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() Drives: '22 Silverado 2500HD Duramax LTZ Join Date: Dec 2015
Location: Millington, MI
Posts: 4,775
|
The A10 has a much steeper 1st and 2nd gear.... kills the city and combined number......
|
|
|
|
|
|
#105 | |
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() Drives: 2018 2SS Camaro Hot Wheels Edition Join Date: Sep 2015
Location: Cleveland, Ohio
Posts: 2,814
|
Quote:
__________________
Zack46
2018 Camaro 2SS Orange Crush Hot Wheels Limited Edition Power Sunroof, 8 Speed Auto/Remote Start, NPP Exhaust Production Sequence Number 98 NEOCC Camaro Club Member Former Ride: 2016 Camaro 2LT RS V6 Hyper Blue Metallic |
|
|
|
|
|
|
#106 | |
|
CamaroFans.com
|
Quote:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
#107 |
![]() Drives: 2017 Nightfall Gray Metallic ZL1 Join Date: Oct 2016
Location: Georgia
Posts: 88
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
#108 |
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() Drives: 2018 2SS Camaro Hot Wheels Edition Join Date: Sep 2015
Location: Cleveland, Ohio
Posts: 2,814
|
__________________
Zack46
2018 Camaro 2SS Orange Crush Hot Wheels Limited Edition Power Sunroof, 8 Speed Auto/Remote Start, NPP Exhaust Production Sequence Number 98 NEOCC Camaro Club Member Former Ride: 2016 Camaro 2LT RS V6 Hyper Blue Metallic |
|
|
|
|
|
#109 |
![]() Drives: 1967 Camaro, 2017 HBM ZL1 Join Date: Dec 2016
Location: Houston, Tx
Posts: 68
|
What I wanna know is if we're paying a "tax", can we write that off our income taxes? The standard deduction is something like 6k I think, but on a Z you're paying around 4K just in sales tax, then there would be the GG tax, and whatever else you had throughout the year would be well over the standard limit. Gotta stick it to the man lol
|
|
|
|
|
|
#110 | |
|
CamaroFans.com
|
Always have to look on the bright side..
![]() Quote:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
#111 |
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() Drives: 66 Chevelle SS Join Date: Mar 2013
Location: SoCal
Posts: 1,347
|
Gas guzzler tax is a sham because you already pay more tax for using more gas. You just pay it each time you buy gas. That should be repealed.
|
|
|
|
|
|
#112 |
![]() Drives: 2017 Hyper Blue A10 ZL1 Join Date: Dec 2016
Location: New England
Posts: 716
|
Manufacturers would never do that! Just ask Volkswagen.
__________________
- Life is a highway... I want to ride it all night long...
Sold 2010 997 GT3, 2016 WRX, 2006 997 C2S, 2003 996 C4S, 2001 Boxster S, 1997 E420 AMG etc.. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Post Reply
|
|
|