|
|
#1 |
|
Account Suspended
Drives: 2016 2ss Join Date: Oct 2016
Location: Virginia
Posts: 250
|
What would you get?
Ok guys...
I'm debating on whether to get eibach springs and BMR sway bars or BC coilovers. I would love to hear what you would chose and why. Springs/swaybars vs. coilovers |
|
|
|
|
|
#2 |
![]() Drives: Chevrolet Camaro SS Join Date: Mar 2015
Location: Planet Earth
Posts: 721
|
I had BC coilovers on my SS, updated Zeta II chassis. The front worked fine, no complaints, but the rears .......
I had them revalved twice to correct the rebound and never did. The rear acted just like a truck when it hit road joints etc. It would compress, and then shoot straight up. As long as the road was smooth, it was OK, but how often does that happen. If I remember they use the same 12Kg spring in the rear and the gen 6 is lighter. I eventually got rid of them for H & R coilovers. If you have to get coilovers get the DR series or the ER. For Eibachs, I had them on the same car. The ride was great, as long as a comfy ride is what you want. The rears are a progressive spring for a soft ride and in theory they are supposed to get stiffer as you compress them. Before you say 'well, it's just an SS'. The SS pulls the same .98 as the gen 6 Camaro SS, so it's no slouch in the handling department. I'm waiting for GM to release their handling kit for the non MRC SS. It's expensive, but it's a matched set, spring to strut/shock. Get the ZL1/LE1 sway bars or the adjustables from BMR. The GM bars come with a front lower arm, guessing the bushing is an up grade and cheaper than the BMR bars. |
|
|
|
|
|
#3 |
![]() Drives: Chevrolet Camaro SS Join Date: Mar 2015
Location: Planet Earth
Posts: 721
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
#4 |
![]() Drives: 2016 Camaro SS Join Date: Apr 2016
Location: Utah
Posts: 713
|
Every time I've done springs, I end up redoing them with coil overs
__________________
16 2SS 6MT NPP White | MRR | ACT | JBA | SCT | C7C
04 Ram 2500 CDT 4x4 Quad 91 Miata 1.8 Feal Wilwood Track Car 1morproject |
|
|
|
|
|
#5 | |
|
Account Suspended
Drives: 2016 2ss Join Date: Oct 2016
Location: Virginia
Posts: 250
|
Quote:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
#6 |
![]() Drives: Chevrolet Camaro SS Join Date: Mar 2015
Location: Planet Earth
Posts: 721
|
Depends on how much you want to spend, MCS is available, but $$$ for a DD that rarely see's a road course.
http://www.camaro6.com/forums/showthread.php?t=475298 Concerning spring, the swift spring, while better, really has nothing to do with the rate, but the ease of install. BC may not have any other choice for the spring in the rear. |
|
|
|
|
|
#7 |
|
Account Suspended
Drives: 2016 2ss Join Date: Oct 2016
Location: Virginia
Posts: 250
|
[QUOTE=glenB;9472099]Depends on how much you want to spend, MCS is available, but $$$ for a DD that rarely see's a road course.
http://www.camaro6.com/forums/showthread.php?t=475298 Concerning spring, the swift spring, while better, really has nothing to do with the rate, but the ease of install. BC may not have any other choice for the spring in the rear.[/QUOTE Well I thought you could chose you spring rate with swift springs. What do you mean it doesn't have anything to do with the spring rate? |
|
|
|
|
|
#8 |
![]() ![]() ![]() |
Overheated the BRs on tail of the dragon several years back. Lost interest in budget shocks.
__________________
It's been fun, done with GM.
2018 Camaro ZL1 (SOLD) - Blown Airbags 2017 Camaro SS F1FTY Member Journal (SOLD) - Bad Motor |
|
|
|
|
|
#9 |
|
Account Suspended
Drives: 2016 2ss Join Date: Oct 2016
Location: Virginia
Posts: 250
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
#10 | |
![]() Drives: Chevrolet Camaro SS Join Date: Mar 2015
Location: Planet Earth
Posts: 721
|
[QUOTE=Doyal_Mcneff;9472113]
Quote:
I just looked at their site and what they show is a limited selection of Swift springs compared to their standard springs. I'm not trying to talk you out of coilovers, they have their place, I just don't think the street is one of them, spend the money on a better, more engineered set. Valving has much more to do with the way they react than the spring, and IMO, that's where BC lacks on the low end coilover. Unless you buy their higher end, ER series or higher where you can adjust the compression/rebound separately. People may say they feel great and they are a big improvement, but they don't really know until they compare them against a better set. BR Series Coilover Chevrolet Camaro SS 2016 In Stock Items Ship Same Day! $1,050.00 Front Spring: 6kg Rear Spring: 12kg *Special Information*: Swift Spring upgrade unavailable for rear Camber: Front Standard/Rear |
|
|
|
|
|
|
#11 |
![]() ![]() ![]() |
Not trying to start a disagreement with BC or their product owners as this happened to me 10 years ago with the BR shocks.
After back to back to back go throughs of the tail of the dragon, the front shocks on my STi were feeling really odd in the turns. Like very inconsistent levels of damping. I pulled over and the adjusters would spin but there was no clicking to tell me which setting they were in (like usual). basically just free spinning adjusters. tried my best to find a stiffer setting and went back out for more runs. nothing improved. parked the car overnight and the next day they were fine again with clear clicks and differences between settings. i replaced them with custom valved KW V3's (and that's another story altogether), and never ran into that issue again. Because of that experience (and how the system continued to feel when pushed) plus many others, I won't personally buy the budget stuff again (lowering springs only, chinese shocks, etc.) With all that said, i'm just one snowflake and we are all unique.
__________________
It's been fun, done with GM.
2018 Camaro ZL1 (SOLD) - Blown Airbags 2017 Camaro SS F1FTY Member Journal (SOLD) - Bad Motor |
|
|
|
|
|
#12 |
![]() Drives: 2019 ZL1 1LE Join Date: Sep 2010
Location: Bastrop, TX
Posts: 441
|
It all depends on your goals. If you just want the car to sit lower, then lowering springs are fine. If you want it to sit lower and legitimately handle well, then the GM kit is a good option. If you have driving competitions to win, then it gets significantly more complicated.
If I wasn't building a competitive AutoX car I'd go with the GM kit over low-end coilovers. My personal starting point for coilovers is a solid mid-range setup like the KW V3, it is well worth the extra money over BC stuff, IMO. Think about your goals, and go from there. Just because setup X meets someone else's goals, doesn't mean it's right for you. |
|
|
|
|
|
#13 | |
|
Account Suspended
Drives: 2016 2ss Join Date: Oct 2016
Location: Virginia
Posts: 250
|
[QUOTE=glenB;9472304]
Quote:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
#14 |
![]() Drives: 2016 Camaro SS Join Date: Apr 2016
Location: Utah
Posts: 713
|
BC will customize the valving to the Swift spring rates. Swift springs are different than standard springs both in the material, their consistency and the fact that they're linear, not progressive.
Hence the difference between BC BR AND BC Custom. According to the tech at BC, you can get Swift springs front and rear. I recommend these for a DD with occasional HPDE use. I would not use these for regular track use. I have a set of these on another car and they work great. Perfect for DD with an occasional canyon. It allows you to dial in the exact rude height you want. The spring rates and valving will match unlike most lowering springs with stock shocks. I don't consider these to be low end but rather mid range coil overs. KWv3 is on the high end. Not sure if there's any low end available.
__________________
16 2SS 6MT NPP White | MRR | ACT | JBA | SCT | C7C
04 Ram 2500 CDT 4x4 Quad 91 Miata 1.8 Feal Wilwood Track Car 1morproject |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Post Reply
|
|
|