Homepage Garage Wiki Register Community Calendar Today's Posts Search
#Camaro6
Go Back   CAMARO6 > Engine | Drivetrain | Powertrain Technical Discussions > I4 Turbo LTG Engine, Exhaust, and Bolt-Ons


KPM Fuel Systems


Post Reply
 
Thread Tools
Old 11-30-2016, 09:44 PM   #43
Evil-Bee-NH
603 Camaros
 
Evil-Bee-NH's Avatar
 
Drives: 2017 NGM I4 1LT Coupe
Join Date: May 2012
Location: Manchester, NH
Posts: 6,779
Quote:
Originally Posted by KMPrenger View Post
Should be pretty easy to get impressive numbers out a tuned and downpipe turbo Camaro. Hitting that tq number might be easier than hitting that HP number.

It was a shame that we never broke the 300rwhp "goal" on the LLT. Got so close though. I think that line may fall with the LGX V6. A manual just threw down almost 290rwhp stock with his manual car, which is pretty close to what you'd expect if you take the 335 crank HP and take roughly 15%.
Didn't the guy forget the name had a yellow V6 did the cams did he ever hit 300RWHP I know the cam numbers were really disappointing.
__________________

MY 2017 I4 CAMARO BUILD JOURNAL | YOUTUBE | INSTAGRAM | 316RWHP - 385 RWTQ HPTUNERS DYNO TUNE | 12.693s @ 105MPH 1/4 Mile
Evil-Bee-NH is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 12-01-2016, 09:02 AM   #44
KMPrenger


 
KMPrenger's Avatar
 
Drives: 16 Camaro SS, 15 Colorado
Join Date: May 2009
Location: Jefferson City, Missouri
Posts: 13,969
Quote:
Originally Posted by Evil-Bee-NH View Post
Didn't the guy forget the name had a yellow V6 did the cams did he ever hit 300RWHP I know the cam numbers were really disappointing.
That was the guy that was trying out the MACE cams....I don't know if he ever got to that mark. His tune was never good, and he had a horrible experience with his installer. In the end, the car ran, but I don't think it ever reached potential.

MACE came out with other revisions of their cams, and honestly I think the later versions were giving good results, but I don't remember anyone doing a dyno with them, which is a shame. I think the MACE cams in the LFX would have topped 300rwhp for sure, but finding dyno runs was like looking for a unicorn.

I don't know if MACE even offers those cams any longer.
__________________
2016 Camaro 1SS - 8-speed - NPP - Black bowties
2010 Camaro 1LT V6 (Sold. I will miss her!)
KMPrenger is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 12-01-2016, 01:04 PM   #45
Evil-Bee-NH
603 Camaros
 
Evil-Bee-NH's Avatar
 
Drives: 2017 NGM I4 1LT Coupe
Join Date: May 2012
Location: Manchester, NH
Posts: 6,779
Quote:
Originally Posted by KMPrenger View Post
That was the guy that was trying out the MACE cams....I don't know if he ever got to that mark. His tune was never good, and he had a horrible experience with his installer. In the end, the car ran, but I don't think it ever reached potential.

MACE came out with other revisions of their cams, and honestly I think the later versions were giving good results, but I don't remember anyone doing a dyno with them, which is a shame. I think the MACE cams in the LFX would have topped 300rwhp for sure, but finding dyno runs was like looking for a unicorn.

I don't know if MACE even offers those cams any longer.
MMM... agreed I miss my V6 every so often did so much to it. But i'm much happier driving the I4, wish I could've had the money for the V8 but not this time around maybe next time. It really is a shame we never had the involvement with dyno numbers like we do on the I4 section I know not all dynos are the same but they give you a good idea of what the cars can do.
__________________

MY 2017 I4 CAMARO BUILD JOURNAL | YOUTUBE | INSTAGRAM | 316RWHP - 385 RWTQ HPTUNERS DYNO TUNE | 12.693s @ 105MPH 1/4 Mile
Evil-Bee-NH is offline   Reply With Quote
 
Post Reply


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump


All times are GMT -5. The time now is 09:34 PM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.9 Beta 4
Copyright ©2000 - 2026, vBulletin Solutions, Inc.