|
|
#57 |
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() Drives: 2015 SS 1LE Red Hot, 1970 Chevelle Join Date: Apr 2012
Location: Chino, CA
Posts: 6,990
|
Delphi was owned by GM when they finalized engineering on the MR shocks. My understanding is GM did the initial engineering and Delphi made it a functional system.
It's like saying Camaro isn't a GM product because Chevy did all the engineering. It's a stupid argument so Ford guys don't have to admit their suspension is based on a GM system.
__________________
|
|
|
|
|
|
#58 | |
|
Account Suspended
Drives: Poop Join Date: Aug 2016
Location: Uranus
Posts: 575
|
Quote:
It doesn't matter where it originally came from...and all of this is getting waaaay off topic. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
#59 | |
|
マスタング = 遅い
Drives: 2017 Chevrolet Camaro SS 1LE Join Date: Aug 2015
Location: Florida
Posts: 7,061
|
Quote:
...but, I do not consider their wheels "cheating" either. It's included on a expensive upgrade, so it's factory. Just an odd choice in my opinion, but I guess they ran out of options. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
#60 |
![]() Drives: 2015 2SS/RS/1LE Join Date: Feb 2016
Location: NW Arkansas
Posts: 334
|
Personally I think the GT350 R is sick. Can't afford one, but it's a bad ass car. I don't think the wheels are cheating either. That's kinda like when the mustang guys said the 1LE head to heads were unfair because of the F1 tires.
|
|
|
|
|
|
#61 |
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() Drives: 2017 Camaro 1SS M6 Join Date: Apr 2015
Location: Indy
Posts: 2,460
|
I do think the wheels on the 1LE should be 19 or even 18" - just big enough to clear the front brakes. I think that's one super inexpensive weight reduction opportunity that was missed.
Unfortunately, 18s would look tiny in the large wheel well. Overall, I'm really impressed with the package though |
|
|
|
|
|
#62 | |
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() Drives: 2015 SS 1LE Red Hot, 1970 Chevelle Join Date: Apr 2012
Location: Chino, CA
Posts: 6,990
|
Quote:
![]() I don't care all that much either way. I just find it funny how Ford people try to completely ignore GM's roll in the magnetic shocks. It would be like if GM called the 9" on the COPO Camaro a 289mm differential. It's still a 9" Ford rear end, even if GM has done additional engineering to the end result.
__________________
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
#63 |
![]() ![]() Drives: 2004 Pontiac Grand Prix Join Date: Oct 2010
Location: Lomita,CA
Posts: 806
|
Magnetic shocks were actually patented i believe in the 1950s (or 60s), GM has the patent for the control system of said shocks. Though they do not own the trade mark for magna ride (hence why they don't use it anymore).......
GM is a major innovator in the automotive industry though they are not the only major innovator, it really comes down to having the resources and being in a position to take risk. That is really what splits the difference between car companies that innovate and ones that do not innovate. At the end of the day making cars isn't about innovation but about putting a set of parts together then tuning those parts to work optimally together. Ford did a really good job putting the GT350R together and tuning it for a great performance, it looks as though GM did an amazing job putting together and tuning the 2017 1LE Camaro. I also believe that Ford did a less then great job tuning the GT350, that it was more there to get the cost down on the GT350R. |
|
|
|
|
|
#64 | |
![]() ![]() Drives: 2004 Pontiac Grand Prix Join Date: Oct 2010
Location: Lomita,CA
Posts: 806
|
Quote:
BWI has developed a number of products under the magnaride TM including sway bars if I remember correctly. I do believe that GM owns the patent for control modules attached to magnetorheological shocks. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
#65 |
|
SABIO
Drives: 2016 CAMARO 1SS Join Date: Jul 2015
Location: Bradford, ON
Posts: 5,012
|
This has turned into a battle of Google-Fu. He who has the best search engine wins.....
__________________
|
|
|
|
|
|
#66 | |
|
Account Suspended
Drives: Poop Join Date: Aug 2016
Location: Uranus
Posts: 575
|
Quote:
Something that I found funny designing wheels for OEMs was....they were always more concerned about form over function. We would constantly come up with EXTREMELY lightweight options, and they always...always...always rejected it because it didn't fit their styling needs. Ferrari seemed to be the most open out of all OEMs to push the envelope. Here is my 458 design (fully forged, 5 axis machined).... ![]() Extremely thin and tall spokes give the best performance...but GM and Ford never really cared for how they looked. Here is a set on ebay....you can see how far I went to lighten these suckers up by milling and drilling pockets on the mounting flange.... http://www.ebay.com/itm/PERFECT-Set-...VXBtn-&vxp=mtr |
|
|
|
|
|
|
#67 |
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() Drives: 2014 2LS (traded in) 2015 1SS 1LE Join Date: Apr 2015
Location: New York
Posts: 2,132
|
This thread is hilarious. People arguing on behalf of two corporations that don't give a sh&# about you and just want your money. Buy the car you like, show up at a track and compare your lap times. Those are the only bragging rights that count. Seriously how far back in time are we going to go and list which corporation pioneered which tech? It's silly.
__________________
|
|
|
|
|
|
#68 |
|
SABIO
Drives: 2016 CAMARO 1SS Join Date: Jul 2015
Location: Bradford, ON
Posts: 5,012
|
Chief Whyz-bula Khan Zhan Ching of the north eastern tribe of Chumba Wumba invented a round disc attached to a stick......
__________________
|
|
|
|
|
|
#69 | |
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() Drives: 2015 SS 1LE Red Hot, 1970 Chevelle Join Date: Apr 2012
Location: Chino, CA
Posts: 6,990
|
Quote:
__________________
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
#70 |
|
Account Suspended
Drives: Poop Join Date: Aug 2016
Location: Uranus
Posts: 575
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Post Reply
|
|
|