|
|
#673 | |
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() Drives: 2014 2LS (traded in) 2015 1SS 1LE Join Date: Apr 2015
Location: New York
Posts: 2,132
|
Quote:
__________________
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
#674 | |
|
Sure, why not?
Drives: 2016 Camaro 2SS, Jeep JKU Rubicon Join Date: Mar 2015
Location: SE Mass
Posts: 1,538
|
Quote:
__________________
This is that witty and clever statement that makes you chuckle.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
#675 | |
![]() Drives: 2016 SS Join Date: Oct 2015
Location: Metairie
Posts: 654
|
Quote:
__________________
1SS Summit White Coupe MRC NPP A8
Ordered 1/12/16 TPW 2/15/16 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
#676 | |
![]() Drives: Future 2017 2SS Join Date: May 2016
Location: Boston
Posts: 50
|
Quote:
Just because you can buy an engine for less from a non GM retailer has nothing to do with what GM is charging you for it.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
#677 | |
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() Drives: Current Camaro-less Join Date: Jul 2014
Location: Oregon
Posts: 3,241
|
Quote:
Which is why I am considering a used one down the line |
|
|
|
|
|
|
#678 | |
|
Sure, why not?
Drives: 2016 Camaro 2SS, Jeep JKU Rubicon Join Date: Mar 2015
Location: SE Mass
Posts: 1,538
|
Quote:
__________________
This is that witty and clever statement that makes you chuckle.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
#679 | |
![]() ![]() Drives: 2016 Summit White Camaro 2SS Join Date: May 2009
Location: SE Michigan
Posts: 759
|
Quote:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
#680 | |
|
Sure, why not?
Drives: 2016 Camaro 2SS, Jeep JKU Rubicon Join Date: Mar 2015
Location: SE Mass
Posts: 1,538
|
Quote:
![]() Yeah, it really is that nice of a car.
__________________
This is that witty and clever statement that makes you chuckle.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
#681 | |
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
Quote:
__________________
Current: '17 2SS Hyper Blue, A8, MRC, NPP
Past: '99 SS Camaro A4, '73 Camaro 383 A3 "Voices in your head are not considered insider information." 3800 Status - 6/16/16 (Built!) 6000 status - 6/29/16 (Delivered!) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
#682 |
|
C'mon- really?
Drives: Looking for a ZL1 Join Date: Aug 2009
Location: Nortwestern Ohio
Posts: 1,966
|
I really do not understand why some 6th Gen owners think that discussion critiquing the low sales number is criticism of the car?
Criticizing what GM is doing or not doing to get the sales numbers up is not a criticism of the car.The only true 'critic' of the car are the sales numbers. Either the buying public loves a car and the numbers are high in its market segment or it doesn't and the numbers are lower. That is as honest as it gets in real feedback. The manufacturer can choose to be happy with those numbers or not but we do not truly know how GM feels at this point. Some say that the lack of incentives may mean that GM is ok with the numbers. Others have said that perhaps GM's marketing group is either ignorant, oblivious, or powerless(?) to do something. And it may just be that GM does NOT really care that much about the Camaro number as long as it is profitable. To that end, there are multiple reasons that may explain the 'why' a car's sales number is higher or lower. It can be from the overall design, the pricing, the features, etc - the list is long. Usually, there are 1-2 key factors at play but often more. It is a very lengthy list and often how a car (especially a performance car) makes you 'feel' is as important as any one of them. Does the car make you want it? Or is just 'meh'? That is the intangible that matters more often than just about anything. The successful company is the one that creates desire for its product but the big question is how? If a company says it is happy with selling less but making more per car than that says it has a somewhat finite profit number it wants the car to make and if makes more, then fine. I think that is a foolish way to think because what company - much less a very publicly traded company! - would not want to make every last dollar it can by selling every car it makes and not have to use incentives to do it? I do not think that is how GM is viewing the Camaro at all (make more per car but sell less and only satisfy the Camaro Enthusiasts and to Hell with any new buyers) but I could be wrong. Incentives really only say one thing in the end - the car is priced too high given the amount of desire to buy it that was created when at the original price. Now, that doesn't mean the car is not worth what it was priced at given its equipment and performance but it just means the buying public thinks it is just 'X' too much so the buyers stay away. So, if by reducing the buyer's price they sell more, then that does go a long way to confirming it. But the downside of incentives is that they are self defeating and affect resale value as well as apparent value for what you are buying. They are often seen as negatives and just as the fire sales GM had for the 5th Gen Z28 did not clear the lots completely, that says that a lower price is not the only barrier to increasing sales. I love the new Camaro. I didn't at first but after I saw one on the ground, I was hooked. I had a 5th Gen ZL1 and absolutely loved it. The 6th gen IMO just improves overall what the 5th Gen needed improving. The LT1 is a monster and in the Camaro it will do very well performance wise as we've already heard. Tie it to the A8 and it's a beast at the strip or the stoplight. Tie it to the M6 and it's a whole lot of fun and driver engagement. It is Win-Win with this car in the drive-train department. I truly think the GM/Chey Sales Team has their head up their behinds if they are A) happy with the May Sales numbers and 2)idiots if they don't do something to increase them. But it is also possible that GM does indeed have an inkling as to why the number is down and may also realize that just throwing incentives at the car in the dollar amount required is not cost-efficient to get the numbers cumulatively higher and be able to best the Mustang. Or, they realize that what it would take to increase sales (a new lower priced model or even another design/refresh) is impossible to do for a variety of reasons. Who knows? I hope things change for June.
__________________
Steve
2018 Camaro 2SS 1LE Black #3805 - SOLD |
|
|
|
|
|
#683 | |
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
Quote:
I've only seen one 6th gen on the road. One.
__________________
2015 Camaro 1LE
2009 Challenger R/T 2007 Solstice GXP 2004 Colorado ZQ8 2002 Trans Am WS6 Collector Edition 1999 Blazer 1994 Grand Prix SE B4U |
|
|
|
|
|
|
#684 |
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() Drives: 2014 2LS (traded in) 2015 1SS 1LE Join Date: Apr 2015
Location: New York
Posts: 2,132
|
I sat in one in a showroom a few months ago. I remember thinking it was new enough to be interesting but familiar enough to know I was in a Camaro. I liked it. I'll be test driving one as soon as my dealer gives me a call and says he has a 17 1LE on the lot.
__________________
|
|
|
|
|
|
#685 | |
|
C'mon- really?
Drives: Looking for a ZL1 Join Date: Aug 2009
Location: Nortwestern Ohio
Posts: 1,966
|
Quote:
You are correct about the comparison with the competition being the focal point of this great debate but if the pricing is keeping even the Camaro faithful from buying a 6th gen, that definitely is a factor that leads into lower sales, right?
__________________
Steve
2018 Camaro 2SS 1LE Black #3805 - SOLD |
|
|
|
|
|
|
#686 | ||
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
Quote:
Quote:
Honestly trying to convert many Gen5 owners at this point is foolish. Many are still deep in terms of payments on theirs or don't feel the need to buy a new car every 2-4 years. So really hope that wasn't GM's plan. Now once we get into 2017-2019 time frame, if there aren't more converts then clearly the Gen5 owners were not impressed.
__________________
Current: '17 2SS Hyper Blue, A8, MRC, NPP
Past: '99 SS Camaro A4, '73 Camaro 383 A3 "Voices in your head are not considered insider information." 3800 Status - 6/16/16 (Built!) 6000 status - 6/29/16 (Delivered!) |
||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Post Reply
|
|
|