|
|
#29 |
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
What exactly is that supposed to mean?
Sent from my SAMSUNG-SM-N900A using Tapatalk
__________________
Current: '17 2SS Hyper Blue, A8, MRC, NPP
Past: '99 SS Camaro A4, '73 Camaro 383 A3 "Voices in your head are not considered insider information." 3800 Status - 6/16/16 (Built!) 6000 status - 6/29/16 (Delivered!) |
|
|
|
|
|
#30 |
![]() ![]() ![]() Drives: 2014 Camaro SS Join Date: Mar 2014
Location: Colorado
Posts: 1,006
|
Ok, I think you're just bein' a bitch here, but if you are serious, I apologize and would like to say that bigger brakes would do the opposite to address the problem of burning up brakes while doing brakestand burnouts. Bigger rear brakes would provide more stopping power, i.e. less brakestanding capability, and thus more power would be required, heating up the rear rotors and pads quicker.
The line lock device is what makes it so your front brakes stay locked while your rears have no pressure. This means you aren't causing any heat on the pads and rear rotors, but you're still able to "stand" still, via the front brakes.
__________________
SOLD: 2014 Camaro Coupe 2SS/RS M6 Blue Ray Metallic, NPP, Nav
2014 Stingray Premiere Edition Coupe #142/500 Z51 3LT M7 Laguna Blue, Magride, NPP, Exposed Carbon Fiber Roof, Carbon Fiber Dash, Suede Wrapped Interior Canceled: 2016 Camaro Coupe 1AK37 2SS Coupe, G7E Garnet Red, BRJ Adrenaline Red Trim, F55 Magnetic Ride, NPP Exhaust, CF5 Sunroof, 56R Gray Split spoke w/ machined face, RN2 LPO Illuminated Bowtie, VYW Premium Floor Mats, W2D LPO Cargo Net |
|
|
|
|
|
#31 | |
|
Account Suspended
Drives: 2016 SS;2010 Camaro SS/RS; 2015 Z06 Join Date: Sep 2015
Location: Gallatin
Posts: 87
|
Quote:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
#32 | |
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
Quote:
This thread is not about whether or not line lock is useful. The OP wanted input on experience with using it. So please quit trying to sell your opinion. If you want to convince everyone why line locks are dumb, make a thread for it by all means. Sent from my SAMSUNG-SM-N900A using Tapatalk
__________________
Current: '17 2SS Hyper Blue, A8, MRC, NPP
Past: '99 SS Camaro A4, '73 Camaro 383 A3 "Voices in your head are not considered insider information." 3800 Status - 6/16/16 (Built!) 6000 status - 6/29/16 (Delivered!) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
#33 |
![]() ![]() ![]() Drives: 2014 Camaro SS Join Date: Mar 2014
Location: Colorado
Posts: 1,006
|
Hmm, well I'm not sure if you meant to reply to me or not, but I did no name calling, sorry if it seemed that way, I simply call it as I see it.
That being said, it's obvious now that you really have have no interest in cars or discussing why line locks save the brakes and why a car with larger rear brakes would have a harder time doing a brake stand. So, I'm done with this conversation with you, and to any others considering replying to this person... ![]() Have a nice day.
__________________
SOLD: 2014 Camaro Coupe 2SS/RS M6 Blue Ray Metallic, NPP, Nav
2014 Stingray Premiere Edition Coupe #142/500 Z51 3LT M7 Laguna Blue, Magride, NPP, Exposed Carbon Fiber Roof, Carbon Fiber Dash, Suede Wrapped Interior Canceled: 2016 Camaro Coupe 1AK37 2SS Coupe, G7E Garnet Red, BRJ Adrenaline Red Trim, F55 Magnetic Ride, NPP Exhaust, CF5 Sunroof, 56R Gray Split spoke w/ machined face, RN2 LPO Illuminated Bowtie, VYW Premium Floor Mats, W2D LPO Cargo Net |
|
|
|
|
|
#34 |
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() Drives: 2017 SS 1LE, 2017 Volt, 2013 Pilot Join Date: May 2014
Location: Colorado
Posts: 4,274
|
__________________
2017 SS 1LE | HBM | Vortech V3-Si supercharger (620RWHP and 575ft lbs) | PDR | Black Bowties | Illuminated Front Black Bowtie | Illuminated Door Sills | Smoked Tails | vented seats mod
|
|
|
|
|
|
#35 | |
![]() Drives: camaros in his dreams Join Date: Jul 2015
Location: dubai,UAE
Posts: 512
|
Quote:
![]() Just don't force your opinion on others.your a good driver,good for you; im not so I could use something like line lock.just because you like to track your car and be "serious" doesn't make people like me who love to burnout and go sideways idiots or amateur drivers. "respect opinions and post helpful stuff" thank you |
|
|
|
|
|
|
#36 |
![]() Drives: 2006 Honda accord v6 6sp manual Join Date: Apr 2015
Location: Florida
Posts: 41
|
I agree, the only true burnout is a no brakes burnout, check out the video on the edmunds website way back in 2010 with a 5 th gen camaro, 2011 mustang and challenger rt, the camaro had the tomatoes to keep it going in second for 150 of glory, the 6th gen should even be more animalistic with much more low end torque
|
|
|
|
|
|
#37 |
![]() Drives: camaros in his dreams Join Date: Jul 2015
Location: dubai,UAE
Posts: 512
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
#38 |
![]() Drives: 2006 Honda accord v6 6sp manual Join Date: Apr 2015
Location: Florida
Posts: 41
|
Yes, the more torque you have the easier the tires will spin, search the Internet for c7 LT1 torque curve. It shows the torque and horsepower as a function of rpm. The LT1 has 50 more ft-lbs than the LS3 between 2 and 4k rpm. I meant to imply it is good
|
|
|
|
|
|
#39 |
![]() Drives: 2006 Honda accord v6 6sp manual Join Date: Apr 2015
Location: Florida
Posts: 41
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
#40 |
![]() Drives: 2006 Honda accord v6 6sp manual Join Date: Apr 2015
Location: Florida
Posts: 41
|
tried to post the LT1 torque curve and having some $^%$%^*%( issues.
|
|
|
|
|
|
#41 |
![]() Drives: 2006 Honda accord v6 6sp manual Join Date: Apr 2015
Location: Florida
Posts: 41
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
#42 |
![]() Drives: 2006 Honda accord v6 6sp manual Join Date: Apr 2015
Location: Florida
Posts: 41
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Post Reply
|
|
|