|
|
#141 |
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() Drives: 2000 Mustang GT Join Date: Jul 2009
Location: Elgin,SC
Posts: 2,707
|
I hate to tell you people but the majority of Camaro and Mustang owners don't give two shits about power or performance.
|
|
|
|
|
|
#142 | |
|
Account Suspended
Drives: FIRST ON RACE DAY Join Date: Feb 2009
Location: Indiana
Posts: 1,170
|
Quote:
Oh and we are fighting because we can
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
#143 | |
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() Drives: 2000 Mustang GT Join Date: Jul 2009
Location: Elgin,SC
Posts: 2,707
|
Quote:
If they can get another 300lbs off the mustang that thing would be pretty damn stout. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
#144 | |
|
Account Suspended
Drives: 07Taho, 11CamaroRS, 12CTSV Coupe Join Date: Oct 2009
Location: MD
Posts: 705
|
Quote:
U can take it back further than that since many of the same Aftermarket mods that worked on the LS1 and LS2, will work on the LS3. (Please not that I am not saying that they are exact fit) The number ONE and number two Aftermarket mods on these engines are an Exhaust System for about $1400 and a CAI for about $300. $1700 and U are looking at about 70-80HP. Throw a tuner a $100 Bill and U get another bunch. I picked up 40HP with just a CAI and a quick tune on my LS3. I already had the NPP Exhaust. I pulled the Fuse, but later got the Mild2Wild Plug-In/Remote and decided to forgo the Corsa's or Billy Boats. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
#145 | |
|
Go Blue!!!!!
Drives: 2012 Cruze LT Join Date: Mar 2009
Location: Indiana
Posts: 23,290
|
Quote:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
#146 | |
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() Drives: 2000 Mustang GT Join Date: Jul 2009
Location: Elgin,SC
Posts: 2,707
|
Quote:
In the real world that probably equals less than 5% of Mustang and Camaro buyers. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
#147 |
|
Go Blue!!!!!
Drives: 2012 Cruze LT Join Date: Mar 2009
Location: Indiana
Posts: 23,290
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
#148 | |
|
Account Suspended
Drives: 07Taho, 11CamaroRS, 12CTSV Coupe Join Date: Oct 2009
Location: MD
Posts: 705
|
Quote:
Are U serious??? When comparing a OHV design to a OHC design, the Liters are not a viable way of discussion. The size of the OHV engine has to be larger because of the internal Cam. Interesting enuff tho, if U look at the two engines fully dressed, the a Ford OHC V6 engine actually looks larger than the GM OHV V8 one. The LS3 is also lighter. As an Example: Ford Engines 3.5L V6 PFI 405 lbs 3.5L V6 EcoBoost 449 lbs Mod V8s 525-550 lbs 6.2L V8 590 lbs Numbers include turbos, not include intercoolers, which average about 20lbs more.. so the EB 3.5L weighs about 469lbs and puts out 365HP. For comparison... According to GM Performance Parts, an LS7 weighs 440 lbs and an LS3 weighs 415 lbs and puts out 505HP and 430HP respectively. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
#149 |
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() Drives: 2000 Mustang GT Join Date: Jul 2009
Location: Elgin,SC
Posts: 2,707
|
What?
The Ford DOHC motors are bigger than the OHV motors. Other than power-to-weight in a vehicle the physical size of the motor doesn't do anything to help it's performance. And the DOHC 5.0 is around 420lbs, not 525-530. |
|
|
|
|
|
#150 | |
|
Account Suspended
Drives: 07Taho, 11CamaroRS, 12CTSV Coupe Join Date: Oct 2009
Location: MD
Posts: 705
|
Quote:
The Cobra was S/C'ed and for all intents moved to try and compete with the Vette with the Camaro/TA gone. Ford started offering the 500HP Mustang which costs almost as much as My Vette and could handle it to save it's or your life. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
#151 |
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() Drives: 2000 Mustang GT Join Date: Jul 2009
Location: Elgin,SC
Posts: 2,707
|
Comparing a Mustang to a Vette is retarded.
And being supercharged in no way changes the fact that in 2003 you could have bought a mustang with 420-430hp. |
|
|
|
|
|
#152 | |
|
Account Suspended
Drives: 07Taho, 11CamaroRS, 12CTSV Coupe Join Date: Oct 2009
Location: MD
Posts: 705
|
Quote:
And ZETA was only a temporary solution for getting the Camaro out. The next Camaro.. due in 2013 will be riding on Alpha Platform (Cadillac ATS) built of HI-Strength Steel and Aluminum. Point is that all manufacturers will be looking at lighter solutions to the weight issue. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
#153 |
|
Account Suspended
Drives: FIRST ON RACE DAY Join Date: Feb 2009
Location: Indiana
Posts: 1,170
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
#154 | |
|
Account Suspended
Drives: 07Taho, 11CamaroRS, 12CTSV Coupe Join Date: Oct 2009
Location: MD
Posts: 705
|
Quote:
The SNOB in me would never compare the Mustang to the Vette. But unfortunately for Mustang fans Ford decided that they would via PRICE. The GT500 comes in $2K under a Vette. |
|
|
|
|
|
Post Reply
|
|
|
Similar Threads
|
||||
| Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
| CAMARO WIKI | Tran | Wiki | 67 | 11-27-2024 08:02 AM |
| Winner, winner - Jalopnik compares the Big 3 | Number 3 | 5th Gen Camaro SS LS LT General Discussions | 31 | 04-17-2011 03:24 PM |
| Think about this and the Z28 5th gen | 13F20 | Camaro ZL1 Forum - ZL1 Specific Topics | 41 | 09-04-2010 12:59 AM |
| Inside Line Burnout Contest: SS, R/T, GT | DGthe3 | Chevy Camaro vs... | 133 | 05-27-2010 03:20 PM |
| Help the Camaro win Motortrend's Championship | truth411 | 5th Gen Camaro SS LS LT General Discussions | 56 | 07-02-2009 05:10 AM |