|
|
#15 |
![]() Drives: SS Join Date: Dec 2015
Location: Canada
Posts: 159
|
Soler with no regrets.
|
|
|
|
|
|
#16 |
![]() Drives: 2019 2SS Camaro Join Date: Jun 2019
Location: Texas
Posts: 26
|
Thanks for this thread. Was getting ready to do my next mod and now I know what I’m doing.
|
|
|
|
|
|
#17 |
![]() Drives: 2017 1SS 1LE...makes me go YeeeHaw! Join Date: Mar 2012
Location: Austin, TX
Posts: 577
|
I'm in almost the same boat, except I will go with the Soler TB.
Of the two OEM parts (air intake/TB) I think the OEM TB has a more negative performance than the OEM air intake. Meaning I would get a more positive feedback in performance from the Soler TB than I would from the Roto Fab Intake. The difference in performance between the Soler TB and the OEM TB is much greater then the difference in performance with the Roto Fab intake and the OEM intake. (I feel like I'm repeating myself!) ![]() Plus, the Soler TB is cheaper than the Roto Fab intake, hence a much better bang for my buck! That's my humble analysis.
__________________
The Thrill isn't around the corner, the Thrill is the corner!
So don't hesitate, just brake late! |
|
|
|
|
|
#18 |
![]() ![]() Drives: 2016 Camaro 2SS, NPP, A8, FBO, E85 Join Date: Oct 2016
Location: Springfield,VA
Posts: 884
|
guys will the Solar TB fit the MSD intake Manifold?
__________________
Well............ At least you tried. lol
|
|
|
|
|
|
#19 |
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() Drives: 2SS 1LE Join Date: Aug 2013
Location: US
Posts: 3,794
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
#20 |
![]() ![]() Drives: 2016 Camaro 2SS, NPP, A8, FBO, E85 Join Date: Oct 2016
Location: Springfield,VA
Posts: 884
|
im confused what do you mean?
__________________
Well............ At least you tried. lol
|
|
|
|
|
|
#21 |
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() Drives: 2SS 1LE Join Date: Aug 2013
Location: US
Posts: 3,794
|
Lt5 throttle body
No contest Get it from tick, they cnc it so it’s ready to bolt on. Get it unported worth 10rwhp across the board |
|
|
|
|
|
#22 |
![]() ![]() Drives: 2016 Camaro 2SS, NPP, A8, FBO, E85 Join Date: Oct 2016
Location: Springfield,VA
Posts: 884
|
you recommend that over nick Williams and every thing else?
__________________
Well............ At least you tried. lol
|
|
|
|
|
|
#23 |
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() Drives: 2SS 1LE Join Date: Aug 2013
Location: US
Posts: 3,794
|
If you’re on ant sort of budget yes
|
|
|
|
|
|
#24 |
![]() Drives: 17 camaro ss Join Date: Mar 2018
Location: Michigan
Posts: 274
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
#25 |
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() Drives: 2SS 1LE Join Date: Aug 2013
Location: US
Posts: 3,794
|
Unported unless your tuner OKs the ported 95mm.
The unported is tunable by anyone. The ported version takes some skill and could still make the calculations in the ecu unhappy Unported the 95mm is a better design than the stocker anyway |
|
|
|
|
|
#26 | |
![]() Drives: 17 camaro ss Join Date: Mar 2018
Location: Michigan
Posts: 274
|
Quote:
Ok I thought you were saying maybe the ported was too much or something |
|
|
|
|
|
|
#27 |
![]() Drives: 2015 Corvette Stingray Join Date: May 2019
Location: Alabama
Posts: 478
|
The 95 mm will be best at WOT, but still lacks behind our 91 mm (effective) at part throttle. If you want the best of both worlds in a 95 mm give us a month or so, we are about to release our modified version of the 95 mm with both, better response and increased WOT flow area. You'll need calibration though.
__________________
Tiffany,
Soler Performance LLC, support@solerengineering.com www.solerengineering.com (251) 468-9786 |
|
|
|
|
|
#28 |
![]() Drives: 2018 Camaro 2SS Join Date: Feb 2019
Location: Arkansas
Posts: 33
|
+1 for SOLER!
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Post Reply
|
|
|