|
|
#141 |
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() Drives: 2016 1SS NFG A8 Join Date: Aug 2017
Location: 46804
Posts: 7,561
|
Guys have been 10's with the stock TB as well. It's not worth running unless you modify the stock IM to make it work. The adapter defeats the purpose. Even then the gains are miniscule. It works well paired with the MSD however.
__________________
2016 NFG SS A8/Whipple 2.9/Fuel System/Flex Fuel |
|
|
|
|
|
#142 |
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() Drives: SS 6 speed of course Join Date: Jan 2016
Location: Hilo, HI
Posts: 4,332
|
MSD and TB can be used with no tune, I drove at least 9 months with this, I I’d tune out the rear O2, but that had nothing to do with intake.
__________________
Forged short block, large duration sub .600 lift Cam Motion cam, 7200 RPM fuel cut, Pray Ported Heads, 3.85 pulley D1X, stage II intercooler, DSX secondary low side, DSX E85 sensor, Lingenfelter big bore 2.0 pump, ported front cats, 60608 Borla, LT4 injectors, ZL1 1LE driveshaft and Katech ported TB, ported MSD intake, BTR valvetrain, ARP studs, ProFlow valves, PS4 tires.
|
|
|
|
|
|
#143 |
![]() Drives: 2018 2ss 1le Join Date: Jan 2018
Location: Huntington, NY
Posts: 482
|
so would we all agree that the msd manifold hands down beats the stock manifold, ported or not.....(I'm thinking of changing)
in the end this will be an n/a build..... |
|
|
|
|
|
#144 |
|
Drives: All GM Performance Join Date: Jul 2011
Location: Mount Airy, NC
Posts: 337
|
I would not do a ported tb without a tune. The 95 unported with the msd can be done. But you will notice some things being different with how the car drives.
|
|
|
|
|
|
#145 |
![]() Drives: 21 SS Join Date: Oct 2017
Location: Dallas
Posts: 367
|
No
__________________
FBO, E85
11.1@123 |
|
|
|
|
|
#146 |
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() Drives: 2016 2SS Join Date: Jul 2016
Location: Sanford NC
Posts: 2,766
|
^^^^^^^ What he said.
__________________
2016 2SS. H/C SBE 1.37 60ft, 6.36@109.49, 9.97@136+. Nuff Said.
|
|
|
|
|
|
#147 |
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() Drives: 2016 2SS Join Date: Jul 2016
Location: Sanford NC
Posts: 2,766
|
Yup.
__________________
2016 2SS. H/C SBE 1.37 60ft, 6.36@109.49, 9.97@136+. Nuff Said.
|
|
|
|
|
|
#148 |
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() Drives: 2016 2SS Join Date: Jul 2016
Location: Sanford NC
Posts: 2,766
|
Truth.....For the most part. LOL.
__________________
2016 2SS. H/C SBE 1.37 60ft, 6.36@109.49, 9.97@136+. Nuff Said.
|
|
|
|
|
|
#149 |
![]() Drives: 2018 2ss 1le Join Date: Jan 2018
Location: Huntington, NY
Posts: 482
|
so why is the msd not better in every way, I'm seeing no loss in low end and only gains upstairs...based on the info around here and what's available on the web...
(I have a ported stock right now and a non ported 95 mm t/b) will be adding 1 7/8 headers and x pipe as well |
|
|
|
|
|
#150 |
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() Drives: 2016 2SS Join Date: Jul 2016
Location: Sanford NC
Posts: 2,766
|
Do a search on the threads I have started. All the info is there. Or check my FB page. All of my dyno work is backed up by track work on multiple cars.
__________________
2016 2SS. H/C SBE 1.37 60ft, 6.36@109.49, 9.97@136+. Nuff Said.
|
|
|
|
|
|
#151 |
![]() Drives: 2018 2ss 1le Join Date: Jan 2018
Location: Huntington, NY
Posts: 482
|
my understanding from what I've seen is that the ported stock manifolds are a big improvement over stock, but they cant keep up upstairs with the msd and where they peak and fall off the msd keeps pulling. I figure with headers and the bigger throttle body you would benefit from a manifold like that, I am hoping not to lose too much downstairs and in all of the dyno posts I've seen around here including the ones from pray, the msd doesn't give up much if anything downstairs even though that was the original thought with the msd….. maybe I'm doing the wrong thing, I don't know... what am I missing
I'm figuring with a tune I should be golden... especially since my next winters plan is cam and ported heads |
|
|
|
|
|
#152 |
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() Drives: 2016 2SS Join Date: Jul 2016
Location: Sanford NC
Posts: 2,766
|
You will lose 20+rw down low. The stock MSD never makes more peak power than the ported stock IM/TB, but it carries a lower number for longer. At the track it is worth half a tent to a tenth at best once ported and with a 95mm TB. Those are the facts with bolt ons.
Now, H/C my ported MSD/TB are worth almost 40rw over my ported stock stuff. I port and sell both so I couldn't care less which one you go with. Just tasting what the dyno and track testing prove over and over again.
__________________
2016 2SS. H/C SBE 1.37 60ft, 6.36@109.49, 9.97@136+. Nuff Said.
|
|
|
|
|
|
#153 |
![]() Drives: 2018 2ss 1le Join Date: Jan 2018
Location: Huntington, NY
Posts: 482
|
clearly I am not the expert...
but I have not seen one dyno that show the msd at a 20 hp deficit anywhere in the power. like I said maybe am just missing that info somewhere |
|
|
|
|
|
#154 | |
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() Drives: 2016 2SS Join Date: Jul 2016
Location: Sanford NC
Posts: 2,766
|
Quote:
Here are three of many.
__________________
2016 2SS. H/C SBE 1.37 60ft, 6.36@109.49, 9.97@136+. Nuff Said.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Post Reply
|
|
|