|
|
#113 | |
![]() Drives: 2016 Mustang GT PP Join Date: Oct 2016
Location: Manheim,Pa.
Posts: 9
|
Quote:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
#114 | |
![]() ![]() Drives: Tesla M3 LR-AWD [Former 1SS owner] Join Date: Jan 2018
Location: Miami
Posts: 950
|
Quote:
Interior design and quality, while less subjective than looks, can still be debatable and polarizing. After comparing the interior of many other vehicles in a similar price range to the that of the Camaro, I can understand why people knock the appearance of the fit and finish. It's one area that's irrelevant to me though. It doesn't have to look expensive, as long as the ergonomics is there, and it's durable, which the Camaro's seems to be. I'd rather the money go into the engine, chassis and tranny. After having sat in the Mustang, it was pretty obvious that Chevy's approach was a driver-focused design with the controls and center console being in easy reach. Notice how they tend to face the driver ever so slightly. For the most part, they achieved that, but at the expense of the roomy feel many are used to. Whether that's good or bad is obviously up for debate. I like it though, and it works. The push-button start switch, the infotainment controls, the mode selector switch are all in easy reach and are positioned just right. In the Mustang, while the shifter position was just as good, the push-button seemed out of place, and I didn't care for the old-style toggle switch design and where they were located among other things. The Camaro won on the ergonomics... for me. I'm also a fan of simplicity. The Camaro's infotainment system, radio, A/C and vehicle information controls were a breeze to figure out. Also, the infotainment software, Mylink, was much more responsive and certainly less buggy than what Ford used in the Mustang. Their Sync 3 still needs work. I've seen people knocking the center console vent locations in the Camaro, but I really don't care where the air comes from, once the cabin cools down. The Mustang had the upper hand with the regards to the trunk opening, but that's it. There's supposedly more backseat room, but it wasn't obvious to me. If you want back seat room and a big trunk, get a Challenger. I agree with you with regards to sales, these cars are not as affordable as they used to be, which alienates a large part of their intended market. It's just one factor out of many that have been covered in this thread. Last edited by torqueaddict; 02-03-2018 at 10:46 AM. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
#115 |
![]() Drives: 2018 ZL1 1LE Join Date: Jan 2018
Location: Canada
Posts: 189
|
I don’t get the cost thing.
In Canada Mustang are really pricey. The full equiped SS 1LE cost less than a 2018 GT PP1. After driving my GT PP, I would take a SS 1LE anytime over a 2018 GT PP1. Thing is I think we V8 performance guys and girls are a minority of the consumers. |
|
|
|
|
|
#116 | |
![]() ![]() Drives: Tesla M3 LR-AWD [Former 1SS owner] Join Date: Jan 2018
Location: Miami
Posts: 950
|
Quote:
Someone said it, but the sad reality is that the Mustang name resonates more with people, and they'll gravitate to it first, without giving the competitor a try. I almost got caught in that trap. If more people actually test drive the Camaro, they'll come away with a much more positive impression. Chevy has to get them into the showrooms and train their sales staff accordingly. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
#117 |
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() Drives: '17 ZL1 Join Date: Jul 2016
Location: Fairmont, WV
Posts: 1,567
|
Obviously there are numerous factors. Here are a few:
One thing that I believe is not a MAJOR factor is the design of the Camaro. I don't believe the car is in any immediate danger, but whether or not we'll see a 7th Gen is anyone's guess. I'd bet even Al doesn't know for sure at this point. Ultimately it'll come down to how profitable they think the car will be relative to its alternative. |
|
|
|
|
|
#118 | |
![]() Drives: Hopefully 6th gen Camaro Join Date: May 2015
Location: Socal
Posts: 586
|
Quote:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
#119 | |
![]() ![]() Drives: 2018 SS 1LE Join Date: Apr 2017
Location: North Jersey
Posts: 778
|
Quote:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
#120 | |
![]() ![]() Drives: 2018 1LT Camaro Join Date: Aug 2017
Location: PA
Posts: 783
|
Quote:
I told him I didn't want to spend over 30k he said: I never seen a Camaro for that much only in the 40k and above range. No wonder nobody buys them. Naturally I got a 18 in November 17 for $29,000 ( with a $2,400 discount)before taxes from another dealer. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
#121 | |
![]() ![]() Drives: 2013 1SS LS3 Join Date: Feb 2014
Location: Massachusetts
Posts: 814
|
Quote:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
#122 |
![]() |
Biggest factor now is time of year. With the cold temps and snowfall. People aren't looking for a Camaro. The price point is a little to much if your paying close to msrp plus the refresh is just around the corner.
|
|
|
|
|
|
#123 |
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() Drives: 2018 2SS Camaro Hot Wheels Edition Join Date: Sep 2015
Location: Cleveland, Ohio
Posts: 2,814
|
What do you mean by aura?
__________________
Zack46
2018 Camaro 2SS Orange Crush Hot Wheels Limited Edition Power Sunroof, 8 Speed Auto/Remote Start, NPP Exhaust Production Sequence Number 98 NEOCC Camaro Club Member Former Ride: 2016 Camaro 2LT RS V6 Hyper Blue Metallic |
|
|
|
|
|
#124 |
![]() Drives: 2018 ZL1 1LE Join Date: Jan 2018
Location: Canada
Posts: 189
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
#125 |
![]() ![]() Drives: 2018 SS 1LE Join Date: Apr 2017
Location: North Jersey
Posts: 778
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
#126 | |
![]() Drives: 2020 LT1 Black Join Date: May 2013
Location: MO
Posts: 589
|
Quote:
If you're ever looking for a cheap apartment in Missouri, try the one with the late 90s mustang parked in front with the obligatory faded paint, cracked body panels and unsightly bumper stickers. Guaranteed low rent. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Post Reply
|
|
|