Homepage Garage Wiki Register Social Groups Calendar Search Today's Posts Mark Forums Read
#Camaro6
Go Back   CAMARO6 > CAMARO6.com General Forums > 2016+ Camaro: 6th Gen Camaro general forum


Bigwormgraphix


Post Reply
 
Thread Tools
Old 09-24-2015, 11:23 AM   #15
90503


 
90503's Avatar
 
Drives: 2011 2SS/RS LS3
Join Date: Nov 2011
Location: Torrance
Posts: 14,578
I agree....the most profitable models should have been announced, revealed, and built first...

So where's the info and schedule for the Z/28, ZL1,and 1LE?
90503 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 09-24-2015, 12:25 PM   #16
joemosfet

 
joemosfet's Avatar
 
Drives: 2014 Camaro SS
Join Date: Mar 2014
Location: Colorado
Posts: 1,006
Quote:
Originally Posted by classicrockr View Post
Got a quote - turbo will be about 1300 less than the v6 with same options.

No much of a difference....but that would almost pay for mrc
If only MRC was an option on the LT models.
__________________
SOLD: 2014 Camaro Coupe 2SS/RS M6 Blue Ray Metallic, NPP, Nav
2014 Stingray Premiere Edition Coupe #142/500 Z51 3LT M7 Laguna Blue, Magride, NPP, Exposed Carbon Fiber Roof, Carbon Fiber Dash, Suede Wrapped Interior

Canceled: 2016 Camaro Coupe 1AK37 2SS Coupe, G7E Garnet Red, BRJ Adrenaline Red Trim, F55 Magnetic Ride, NPP Exhaust, CF5 Sunroof, 56R Gray Split spoke w/ machined face, RN2 LPO Illuminated Bowtie, VYW Premium Floor Mats, W2D LPO Cargo Net
joemosfet is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 09-24-2015, 12:32 PM   #17
KMPrenger


 
KMPrenger's Avatar
 
Drives: 16 Camaro SS, 15 Colorado
Join Date: May 2009
Location: Jefferson City, Missouri
Posts: 13,969
Quote:
Originally Posted by Number 3 View Post
In reality, it is VERY hard to launch a car for production. The I4 is likely being held back to add more focus on the top two sellers, the V6s and V8s. The I4 will follow after the major launch same as the convertible.

It just removes a level of complexity from the initial launch. It's also an indicator that GM doesn't expect the I4 to be a huge seller. And it also probably fits with the ramp up to full production.

Oh, and it is likely the least profitable of the 3 engines so no real need to hurry on that, but that's more of a guess.
THIS...

Quote:
Originally Posted by LesserO2Evils View Post
I think there are going to be a lot if shocked people at the impressive sales of this lil I4T.
and THIS.
__________________
2016 Camaro 1SS - 8-speed - NPP - Black bowties
2010 Camaro 1LT V6 (Sold. I will miss her!)
KMPrenger is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 09-24-2015, 12:48 PM   #18
JaxChris

 
Drives: '16 2SS GD1 MX0 NPP F55 IO6
Join Date: Jun 2013
Location: Florida
Posts: 1,298
I disagree on the comment of the 2.0T not being a big seller. My belief is the opposite. The V6 is coming first to move them as best they can. The V6 Camaro will beat the EB & V6 Mustang. But once the 2.0T comes out, also beats the V6 Mustang and hangs with the EB Mustang, nobody will see a reason for the V6 option. Either you get the 4cyl cruiser or you get the 8cyl racer.

In 1-2 years, there won't be a V6 Camaro anymore.
JaxChris is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 09-24-2015, 12:55 PM   #19
KMPrenger


 
KMPrenger's Avatar
 
Drives: 16 Camaro SS, 15 Colorado
Join Date: May 2009
Location: Jefferson City, Missouri
Posts: 13,969
Quote:
Originally Posted by JaxChris View Post
I disagree on the comment of the 2.0T not being a big seller. My belief is the opposite. The V6 is coming first to move them as best they can. The V6 Camaro will beat the EB & V6 Mustang. But once the 2.0T comes out, also beats the V6 Mustang and hangs with the EB Mustang, nobody will see a reason for the V6 option. Either you get the 4cyl cruiser or you get the 8cyl racer.

In 1-2 years, there won't be a V6 Camaro anymore.
1-2 years?? No way. Maybe after the refresh, or for gen 7...sure I can go with that. (if the V6 isn't selling well)

But look at the stock numbers....the V6 performance over the 2.0 is worth the difference in price. If people want a reasonably priced ride that has great performance they will be looking at the V6 over the 2.0.

Only modders who are serious about tuning will choose the 2.0 over the V6 (for performance reasons).

There are also those that will choose the V6 over the 2.0 b/c of the sound...same as V8 over all else b/c of sound for some people out there. Too many people are using the Mustang as evidence....yeah the EB sells WAY more, but Ford also neutered the V6 by offering no upper end options or PP on it. Also, the V6 actually LOST a bit of HP over the previous model. They are pushing the EB in a big way.

So I think you aren't giving the V6 a fair fight. I love to mod, and my choice would have been the V6 over the 2.0 for the sound, and the fact that I loved my last V6 and it should be easy to get 350+HP out of this one. That would be awesome in a 3,500 pound car...but I ended up in an SS this time around.
__________________
2016 Camaro 1SS - 8-speed - NPP - Black bowties
2010 Camaro 1LT V6 (Sold. I will miss her!)
KMPrenger is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 09-24-2015, 01:02 PM   #20
Camaro_Corvette
36.58625, -121.7568
 
Camaro_Corvette's Avatar
 
Drives: Team 1LE
Join Date: Mar 2008
Location: Earth
Posts: 23,710
Quote:
Originally Posted by Number 3 View Post
In reality, it is VERY hard to launch a car for production. The I4 is likely being held back to add more focus on the top two sellers, the V6s and V8s. The I4 will follow after the major launch same as the convertible.

It just removes a level of complexity from the initial launch. It's also an indicator that GM doesn't expect the I4 to be a huge seller. And it also probably fits with the ramp up to full production.

Oh, and it is likely the least profitable of the 3 engines so no real need to hurry on that, but that's more of a guess.
This.
__________________
I am seriously never serious vv V vv Next order of business
Camaro_Corvette is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 09-24-2015, 02:24 PM   #21
VF-22
 
Drives: 4 Wheels
Join Date: May 2015
Location: USA
Posts: 150
I don't think they believe it will be that big a seller vs the other 2 models and I'm sure they would rather get the Camaro out for their enthusiasts vs the T4 buyer who is most likely just buying it for a DD/gas savings.

The one thing Chevy got so right is the T4 -> V6 - V8 order unlike Ford who really confused the heck out of consumers. Their V6 should have been the mid model.
VF-22 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 09-24-2015, 02:34 PM   #22
Boilermaker128
 
Drives: 2010 CobaltSSTC
Join Date: Sep 2015
Location: Ontario
Posts: 515
I'd rather the sound of the 4 than the 6. Blowoff valve and tune for $500 and your psssssh will turn heads.
Boilermaker128 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 09-24-2015, 03:13 PM   #23
laborsmith


 
Drives: 1969 Corvair, 2018 Camaro T4 RS
Join Date: Mar 2009
Location: Detroit Metropolitan Area
Posts: 2,881
Doesn't need a tune but the correct short ram intake and by pass valve and you will have sufficient pssssh to turn heads. Of course, little or no power boost unless tuned, but definitely enough pssssh to make it worthwhile.

Laborsmith
laborsmith is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 09-24-2015, 03:34 PM   #24
NASTY99Z28

 
Drives: 99z28 with bolt-ons and a mwc fab 9
Join Date: Jul 2012
Location: Florida
Posts: 1,277
To bad the lil 4 can't get mrc. A 350-375hp lightweight with mrc would be a blast to drive and cheap too.
__________________
I like my woman like my milk shakes, THICK!!!!
NASTY99Z28 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 09-24-2015, 05:44 PM   #25
Number 3
Hail to the King baby!
 
Number 3's Avatar
 
Drives: '19 XT4 2.0T & '22 VW Atlas 2.0T
Join Date: Dec 2008
Location: Illinois
Posts: 12,310
Quote:
Originally Posted by NASTY99Z28 View Post
To bad the lil 4 can't get mrc. A 350-375hp lightweight with mrc would be a blast to drive and cheap too.
You just described the V6.

A 2.0T higher than 300 HP is a hand grenade.
__________________
"Speed, it seems to me, provides the one genuinely modern pleasure." - Aldous Huxley
Number 3 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 09-24-2015, 06:05 PM   #26
joemosfet

 
joemosfet's Avatar
 
Drives: 2014 Camaro SS
Join Date: Mar 2014
Location: Colorado
Posts: 1,006
Quote:
Originally Posted by Number 3 View Post
A 2.0T higher than 300 HP is a hand grenade.
As in "it's a blast to drive" ?
__________________
SOLD: 2014 Camaro Coupe 2SS/RS M6 Blue Ray Metallic, NPP, Nav
2014 Stingray Premiere Edition Coupe #142/500 Z51 3LT M7 Laguna Blue, Magride, NPP, Exposed Carbon Fiber Roof, Carbon Fiber Dash, Suede Wrapped Interior

Canceled: 2016 Camaro Coupe 1AK37 2SS Coupe, G7E Garnet Red, BRJ Adrenaline Red Trim, F55 Magnetic Ride, NPP Exhaust, CF5 Sunroof, 56R Gray Split spoke w/ machined face, RN2 LPO Illuminated Bowtie, VYW Premium Floor Mats, W2D LPO Cargo Net
joemosfet is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 09-24-2015, 06:23 PM   #27
Number 3
Hail to the King baby!
 
Number 3's Avatar
 
Drives: '19 XT4 2.0T & '22 VW Atlas 2.0T
Join Date: Dec 2008
Location: Illinois
Posts: 12,310
Quote:
Originally Posted by joemosfet View Post
As in "it's a blast to drive" ?
LOL


I know of a lot of people in the Solstice/Sky community that have gone over 400 HP with the 2.0T. But 100 HP per cylinder gained by simply upping the boost does not make for a durable engine. Now start from scratch and design it for 400 HP and ultra high cylinder pressures? Maybe.

Now if you baby it around town and don't do what GM does to validate an engine and don't put a lot of miles on it, you might be ok. It's just not an engine that would likely pass any OEM's testing for durability or emissions. But of course there are tuners out there that will tell you it's MOHR durable than stock.

Remember, just because you can doesn't mean you should.
__________________
"Speed, it seems to me, provides the one genuinely modern pleasure." - Aldous Huxley
Number 3 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 09-24-2015, 06:47 PM   #28
SupportGeek
 
Drives: 2015 1SS/RS Blue Velvet Metallic
Join Date: May 2015
Location: Hollister, CA
Posts: 114
Quote:
Originally Posted by 90503 View Post
It's a mystery....I don't see any rhyme or reason for what is announced, what is revealed, what is available, what is or is not going to be made....Maybe it's a combo of a tortuous reveal/non-reveal/maybe/wait/who knows...and they're getting out what they can, when they can...

It's a head scratcher...the T-4 is a car they said they will build, but no-one has seen or driven one...and it was announced at the reveal....

Other models, ZL-1, Z/28(?), 1LE(?) have been "seen", but not even mentioned to exist or be manufactured at any time in the near future...

Consider yourself lucky....expect hear about what does not exist yet, but don't expect to hear anything about what you see....
Not quite true, its been seen here for example, in this video with Michael Tung, drifting around.



It looks impressive, even though its just a 4 banger.
I definitely want to try one out when they are available, but I want the V8. Still, I bet its fun to throw around.
SupportGeek is offline   Reply With Quote
 
Post Reply

Thread Tools

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump


All times are GMT -5. The time now is 07:18 AM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.9 Beta 4
Copyright ©2000 - 2026, vBulletin Solutions, Inc.