|
|
#211 |
|
603 Camaros
Drives: 2017 NGM I4 1LT Coupe Join Date: May 2012
Location: Manchester, NH
Posts: 6,779
|
__________________
MY 2017 I4 CAMARO BUILD JOURNAL | YOUTUBE | INSTAGRAM | 316RWHP - 385 RWTQ HPTUNERS DYNO TUNE | 12.693s @ 105MPH 1/4 Mile |
|
|
|
|
|
#212 | |
![]() Drives: 2018 Camaro 2SS Join Date: Mar 2018
Location: Charlotte NC
Posts: 64
|
Quote:
I do like to surprise people, though! My 2002, with STI block, bigger turbo, and no cats sounded outstanding to me. Characteristic unequal header length rumble, with the whistle of a turbo spooling up, mixed in...awesome. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
#213 |
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() Drives: 2024 Riverside Blue 2SS 1LE Join Date: Mar 2016
Location: Fort Wayne, IN
Posts: 1,373
|
People are hilarious. The reason they offer so many different configurations because there are so many different types of people and needs. I chose the V6 because I prefer the bells and whistles then a low end 1SS. I don't track the car and the V6 offers more then anything I will ever need on the street. If I wanted to track the car then I would step up and buy a ZL1, If I wanted to drag the car then I would get a SS and mod the crap out of it. But in the end I don't care what anyone else thinks because I am the one grinning when I open the garage. Even back in the day you could get the SS in numerous mechanical configurations and the RS was more of a dress trim. You could even get the SS in RS trim. So love what you drive.
|
|
|
|
|
|
#214 |
![]() ![]() ![]() Drives: 02 Camaro SS 6M / 11 GMC Sierra Join Date: Mar 2017
Location: Pickering, Ontario, Canada
Posts: 1,096
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
#215 | |
![]() Drives: 2019 1ss 1le, blue wrap Join Date: Aug 2017
Location: Maryland
Posts: 635
|
Quote:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
#216 | |
![]() ![]() ![]() Drives: 02 Camaro SS 6M / 11 GMC Sierra Join Date: Mar 2017
Location: Pickering, Ontario, Canada
Posts: 1,096
|
Quote:
It's a car that handles better and has less front-end heft than the SS. It's not as fast as an SS but it's most certainly not as expensive. It is faster than 95% of cars on the road today including most V8 cars and it can run with even last-gen Camaros and Mustangs. Though the last gen Camaros are 0.5 Seconds faster in 0 to 60 The op wanted to know why there was no love for the V6 Camaro. I think this thread shows there is plenty of love for it. There's always going to be guys who bought a more expensive car that want to bash other cars that they seem to believe are below them. There's also going to be the guys like the ZL1 guy who just wanted to come here and s*** on everybody to make himself feel better. the bottom line is it is the new poor man sports car. The V6 handles like it's on Rails sounds fantastic when you put the NPP exhaust on it. and really is the best value for your money. Is the SS better? absolutely. Do I wish I had it? sure if I had the extra money who wouldn't want it. Is my V6 enough to put a smile on my face every single time I drive it? you betcha. This is a V6 that you need to have no regrets about owning. it's fast it sounds good and it's good on gas. And that turbo 4 is nothing to sneeze at either. it's even cheaper the younger crowd loves turbos and it just gets more interest into the Camaro platform. I don't see why people would think there's a downside to that. So again I say op there is lots of love for the V6 Camaro. 3.6 is on the wards 10 best list. It does 0 to 60 and 5.1 seconds. And it sounds exotic when equipped with the right exhaust. Go ahead and buy one you won't be disappointed
Last edited by IMadeYouReadThis; 04-26-2018 at 12:07 PM. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
#217 | |
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() Drives: '17 Camaro 2SS & '99 Camaro Z28 Join Date: Feb 2014
Location: Austin, TX
Posts: 1,975
|
Quote:
I don't consider it a performance car either, I consider it a sports coupe of which I personally believe is different. There are many sports cars out there but most are not designed to be all out performers such as the SS, Mustang GT, any another above that.. they were designed to give you your kicks and grins at a economical affordability and I believe the V6 does a great job at that. Performance wise, alot would need to be done to surpass its limits of which feasibility wises it easier and cheaper to upgrade.. not bashing the V6 in that regard but overall I personally feel this is why the aftermarket is weak in that respect.. Its cheaper and easier for aftermarket vendors to stock and supply for one model that is far more likely to get attention (as far as modifications go) than it would be a car that was intended to be an entry level sports coupe that is nearly maxed out from the factory short of F.I. however...that doesn't necessarily mean it's not a great performer nor does it mean its not a sports car, it just means from the factory it was never intended to compete in the performance category..it was intended to give people an option to buy a Camaro who didn't want to bite the coin for an SS or ZL1 and honestly its presence is probably the only reason that Camaro's are really still in production given sales numbers and profits. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
#218 |
![]() Drives: 2016 2SS Join Date: Dec 2014
Location: Clarkston, Michigan
Posts: 104
|
You might want take a read through this I4 autocross thread if you haven't already. I have no experience with either the I4 or V6, or autocross at all, but it sounds these guys make them sound quite good at it.
https://www.camaro6.com/forums/showthread.php?t=477232 |
|
|
|
|
|
#219 | |
![]() Drives: 2016 Camaro 1LT V6 Join Date: Mar 2018
Location: Kentucky
Posts: 95
|
Quote:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
#220 | |
![]() Drives: 4Runner Join Date: Apr 2018
Location: California
Posts: 64
|
Quote:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
#221 |
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() Drives: '17 Camaro 2SS & '99 Camaro Z28 Join Date: Feb 2014
Location: Austin, TX
Posts: 1,975
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
#222 |
![]() Drives: 4Runner Join Date: Apr 2018
Location: California
Posts: 64
|
Oh man! What a day! I’m back after 5 test drives... (all around the same location for accurate comparison)
2.0T Really felt like it had a beefy midrange. I was shocked how it pushed me back into my seat! Very quiet, nothing too impressive noise wise. The engine felt very, very smooth. Kind of surprising having such a smooth engine in a sporty car, but not bad. The car felt very nimble, but I can’t imagine you’d notice the weight difference as an advantage daily driving. It is more of a different FEEL than actual performance change. V6 Hmm... I am very conflicted about this. The dealer let me wind her out, and at high RPMs it literally screamed. It was so exhilarating, but I was left wanting a little something at low RPMs. It didn’t feel super torquey down low. The 2.0T actually felt quicker if you were driving around town at 7/10ths. When you really let her wind out, that’s when you know there’s a little more power under there. I couldn’t imagine myself doing this though, so I’ve got mixed feelings. V8 Oh boy, what words can I use? Teenage boys probably have wet dreams about it. When I fired her up it was incredible. The car felt heavy, but it didn’t feel bad. If felt like it was very planted and hooked up. Not as playful as the other cars, more like “cut the crap, let’s go”... I really did like it, but the fuel economy was absolutely horrendous. I couldn’t afford to keep one of those bad boys with my heavy foot. I basically soiled my underwear when he told me to give it some gas. I couldn’t believe it. Fun car. Now for the funny part, let’s talk about stangs on the camaro forum!!! 2.3 Ecoboost I’m not a ford guy, but I’m impressed. The ecoboost runs out of breath at higher RPMs, but it certainly FEELS faster than the V6. I know the V6 is technically faster, but my butt got some good feelings from that 2.3... The steering wasn’t as nice, but the car was very playful. I found myself chirping tires, and honestly just felt kind of like a hoonigan. In my opinion it was more fun to drive slow, if that makes any sense. GT Let me just say I have mixed feelings. The active exhaust is marvelous. Both the GT and Camaro SS had them, but the Coyote just has a much feistier snarl. It also felt quicker for some reason. It just pulled all the way to 7! (Yes, the dealer let me go there...I felt guilty!) I found the GT a little more scary than the Ecoboost. The I4 was fun to hoon around in, probably the funnest car I drove today (NOTE fun, not best), but the GT was just kinda uncomfortable. It had SO much power that it always wanted to let loose. Anywhere, all the time. If you mastered the throttle/engine, you could have a hell of a time just skidding around everywhere (just like old school muscle cars), but to me it was scary. So, what’s my consensus? I really don’t know. The V6 felt like the best performance bargain, and puts down the best acceleration times other than the V8. The 2.0 camaro felt more powerful when putting around town, but you felt like there was a little bit of a top end compromise. The ecoboost felt more potent and playful. I had the most fun in this car, but I was aware it wasn’t the refined performance machine the camaros were. That might have just made it more entertaining. Hopefully this long babbling post helps someone, because it sure as hell doesn’t help me! |
|
|
|
|
|
#223 | |
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() Drives: '17 Camaro 2SS & '99 Camaro Z28 Join Date: Feb 2014
Location: Austin, TX
Posts: 1,975
|
Quote:
All of this sounds about right. I told you that you would see what I meant when you test drove a V6 vs an SS. The reason the I4 "feels" beefier than the V6 (and I certainly noticed this as well when I was test driving) is because it has a very sharp torque curve where as the V6 has a gradual torque curve. With the graduality of the torque curve, you won't "FEEL" the accelleration in the V6 until the higher RPMS where its making its peak torque, however; much like the same comparison to the OLDER LT1 4th Gen and LS1 4th Gen, (The LT1 4th Gen felt faster but the LS1 actually IS faster.) don't let your butt dyno give you numbers... the V6 is a good bit faster than the I4 out the factory, and it also dominated the ecoboost as well.. its just not as exhilarating driving around town however..it loves to Rev and over time you will find those sweet acceleration spots and it becomes more fun then. The SS is exactly as you said...it doesnt screw around...its an absolute beast and you gotta becareful with her too because she will take you for a ride you don't wanna go on if you start playing too much with her... |
|
|
|
|
|
|
#224 |
![]() Drives: '17- 1ag37 V6 traded, for 1SS 2018! Join Date: Mar 2018
Location: MA
Posts: 469
|
+1.
To me, you nailed the power characteristics between the V6 and V8 Camaros. However, the mileage in mine (V8) with about half and half driving was a verified 27.74mpg--- Which is precisely what I got with the V6 on the same route, and at the same speed. ???????? Go figure. I suppose if you're a bit heavy with the right foot, mileage will be affected. In my case, there were a lot of bears around, so in each case, I didn't push my luck. Both cars liked 80mph, but I felt the 6 was just a twitch off on the low end. Nice update! |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Post Reply
|
| Thread Tools | |
|
|