Homepage Garage Wiki Register Community Calendar Today's Posts Search
#Camaro6
Go Back   CAMARO6 > Engine | Drivetrain | Powertrain Technical Discussions > I4 Turbo LTG Engine, Exhaust, and Bolt-Ons


BeckyD @ James Martin Chevy


Post Reply
 
Thread Tools
Old 04-10-2017, 12:41 PM   #1
psykostevo
 
Drives: Smart
Join Date: Mar 2017
Location: Phoenix, AZ
Posts: 59
Why you don't modify the LTG without tuning it

I recently began working with a customer who came to us with a modified car (as most do), who was ready for their tune. The mods were installed with the anticipation of having the tune done right away, so there is no real worry in this particular case, but it got me thinking about the people who buy just the bolt-ons and either don't buy the tune at all or buy it way down the road.

The stock pulls on this car show that with the bolt-ons this particular car is making a very healthy amount of power. That is, until it hits the ECU's factory torque output limit and torque management steps in to greatly reduce the amount of power that the engine is allowed to put to the ground.

In the graph you can see that from about 3,750 RPM to about 5,750 RPM the power output of the car is significantly reduced. This will happen if your car produces more torque than the ECU's preset torque limit, and is a significant reason to make sure that you get a good tune to support your mods. Without a tune this driver would be scooting around with basically less than 200whp due to the torque management intervention, when they could easily be making well over 260 whp as is. The torque management on these cars is aggressive on the stock tune, and very unforgiving.



What is actually happening here is that the ECU is sensing the additional torque output and is commanding the throttle body to start closing (much like it does during traction control). As the driver you may feel this as a sort of "nerfing" or dead spot in the powerband.

In even more extreme cases the ECU will also start to report false knock retard in order to demand less airflow from the turbocharger. (there is a table that reduces allowed airflow from the turbo in the presence of knock, FYI).

Here is what the ECU commanded Throttle % was, despite the fact that the driver's foot was at 100% throttle the entire time:


Last edited by psykostevo; 04-10-2017 at 12:47 PM. Reason: Pics weren't working
psykostevo is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 04-10-2017, 01:19 PM   #2
Evil-Bee-NH
603 Camaros
 
Evil-Bee-NH's Avatar
 
Drives: 2017 NGM I4 1LT Coupe
Join Date: May 2012
Location: Manchester, NH
Posts: 6,779
Throttle controller negates the throttle adjustment from the stock ecu but your write-up makes a ton of sense and me and my tuner saw the same thing.
__________________

MY 2017 I4 CAMARO BUILD JOURNAL | YOUTUBE | INSTAGRAM | 316RWHP - 385 RWTQ HPTUNERS DYNO TUNE | 12.693s @ 105MPH 1/4 Mile
Evil-Bee-NH is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 04-10-2017, 01:38 PM   #3
Nate...
 
Nate...'s Avatar
 
Drives: 2016 Camaro LTG
Join Date: Jul 2016
Location: SE Michigan
Posts: 316
Torque management strikes again. Interesting charts. Thank you!
__________________
2016 LTG Camaro in Hyper Blue with MRT V3 Catback and Brembo SS Brakes.
Nate... is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 04-10-2017, 01:56 PM   #4
psykostevo
 
Drives: Smart
Join Date: Mar 2017
Location: Phoenix, AZ
Posts: 59
Quote:
Originally Posted by Evil-Bee-NH View Post
Throttle controller negates the throttle adjustment from the stock ecu but your write-up makes a ton of sense and me and my tuner saw the same thing.
Got a link to the Throttle Controller product? I haven't had a customer bring one in yet, and I don't use them personally.
psykostevo is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 04-10-2017, 01:58 PM   #5
psykostevo
 
Drives: Smart
Join Date: Mar 2017
Location: Phoenix, AZ
Posts: 59
Quote:
Originally Posted by oemtech View Post
I will agree with the above. I have been monitoring my stock tune for better part 2 months. I monitor KR, Ing, & LTFT/STFT's. Even with moderate acceleration, like getting on the freeway, I see knock retard, with no audtiable knock and ignition timing being pulled.

I have the ear of a GM engineer and he has stated, "It is all about TORQUE MANAGEMENT". So, even with bolt on's your screwed. I had my ATS on a mobile dyno at Coffee & Cars once with a canned Diablo tune. I was not impressed even though it ran 144.3 at the Texas Mile. Now if you compare my dyno sheet with the one above it will verify what RPM Motorsports is saying.
Yeah, usually the False KR only comes into play when your airflow g/cyl exceeds the Knock Limit programmed in the tune. They use it like an overboost controller, though it's based on cylinder airmass and not pressure persay.
psykostevo is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 04-10-2017, 01:59 PM   #6
psykostevo
 
Drives: Smart
Join Date: Mar 2017
Location: Phoenix, AZ
Posts: 59
Also something I found interesting is how perfectly overlapped after 5800 or so RPM these 2 pulls were. They were different below that rpm, but above that RPM they were 100% identically overlapped.
psykostevo is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 04-10-2017, 02:02 PM   #7
Michigan1LTRS
Blessed ❤️
 
Michigan1LTRS's Avatar
 
Drives: 2017 1LT RS I4
Join Date: Sep 2016
Location: Indiana
Posts: 2,577
Understanding it would void the warranty but how much hp stock can this car put down safely with a tune only?
__________________
2017 1LT RS I4 A8 BLACK ON BLACK
Kindness and compassion #OthersFirst
Michigan1LTRS is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 04-10-2017, 02:15 PM   #8
Evil-Bee-NH
603 Camaros
 
Evil-Bee-NH's Avatar
 
Drives: 2017 NGM I4 1LT Coupe
Join Date: May 2012
Location: Manchester, NH
Posts: 6,779
Quote:
Originally Posted by psykostevo View Post
Got a link to the Throttle Controller product? I haven't had a customer bring one in yet, and I don't use them personally.
There's two out that work well with the 2016+ 2.0T. What they basically do is modify the voltage sent to the throttle so it opens faster. You'll here all kinds of negative and positive on the devices like some will say just slam your foot down harder same result but it's not and it is that simple. With your TRQ MGMNT no amount of foot stomping will stop the decrease. Also stomping the foot isn't what the throttle controller is really intended for it's a nice by-product but under normal acceleration it makes the car respond better by opening that throttle faster. I'll post links to both after I did a simple google search for them. Like I said earlier me and my tuner noticed the same thin your seeing only on my runs it cut out after the 5500rpm range on pulls which is fairly typical of most cars without a tune. You can find my pulls on my Build Journal under the sticky in this section. I'll end by stating these aren't everyone's cup of tea and this isn't me promoting the product they are a bit pricey but it's a personal comfort/feeling mod more then anything else doesn't add power period.

Vitesse Throttle Controller

JMS PedalMax
__________________

MY 2017 I4 CAMARO BUILD JOURNAL | YOUTUBE | INSTAGRAM | 316RWHP - 385 RWTQ HPTUNERS DYNO TUNE | 12.693s @ 105MPH 1/4 Mile
Evil-Bee-NH is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 04-10-2017, 02:16 PM   #9
Evil-Bee-NH
603 Camaros
 
Evil-Bee-NH's Avatar
 
Drives: 2017 NGM I4 1LT Coupe
Join Date: May 2012
Location: Manchester, NH
Posts: 6,779
Quote:
Originally Posted by Michigan1LTRS View Post
Understanding it would void the warranty but how much hp stock can this car put down safely with a tune only?
I'd say stock with a tune your gonna max out your setting around 320RWHP. Different mods and different cars will have different limitations because they may come of the same assembly line but no two engines or cars are the same despite having the same build order and operation some just last and fly better then others.
__________________

MY 2017 I4 CAMARO BUILD JOURNAL | YOUTUBE | INSTAGRAM | 316RWHP - 385 RWTQ HPTUNERS DYNO TUNE | 12.693s @ 105MPH 1/4 Mile
Evil-Bee-NH is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 04-10-2017, 02:51 PM   #10
Michigan1LTRS
Blessed ❤️
 
Michigan1LTRS's Avatar
 
Drives: 2017 1LT RS I4
Join Date: Sep 2016
Location: Indiana
Posts: 2,577
Quote:
Originally Posted by Evil-Bee-NH View Post
I'd say stock with a tune your gonna max out your setting around 320RWHP.
Hmm, 320rwhp with a tune only? Steve can you verify this?
__________________
2017 1LT RS I4 A8 BLACK ON BLACK
Kindness and compassion #OthersFirst
Michigan1LTRS is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 04-10-2017, 03:41 PM   #11
Evil-Bee-NH
603 Camaros
 
Evil-Bee-NH's Avatar
 
Drives: 2017 NGM I4 1LT Coupe
Join Date: May 2012
Location: Manchester, NH
Posts: 6,779
Quote:
Originally Posted by Michigan1LTRS View Post
Hmm, 320rwhp with a tune only? Steve can you verify this?
Just remember dyno conditions and different cars. Look at what mine dyno'd stock but also take into consideration I've had awesome dyno pull conditions stock pull it was maybe 65 degrees no humidity cool air. Bolt-On was 50 degrees and slightly humid. Basically both were great conditions to have a dyno pull Saturdays pull was near perfect conditions 40 degrees cool weather and a cool breeze unfortunately HPTuners f@cked up my tuning day with sending the wrong file version.
__________________

MY 2017 I4 CAMARO BUILD JOURNAL | YOUTUBE | INSTAGRAM | 316RWHP - 385 RWTQ HPTUNERS DYNO TUNE | 12.693s @ 105MPH 1/4 Mile
Evil-Bee-NH is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 04-10-2017, 05:07 PM   #12
ChicagoTommy

 
Drives: 2017 Camaro; 2017 Acadia Denali
Join Date: Jun 2016
Location: Chicago, IL/Williams Bay WI
Posts: 1,022
Quote:
Originally Posted by Evil-Bee-NH View Post
There's two out that work well with the 2016+ 2.0T. What they basically do is modify the voltage sent to the throttle so it opens faster. You'll here all kinds of negative and positive on the devices like some will say just slam your foot down harder same result but it's not and it is that simple. With your TRQ MGMNT no amount of foot stomping will stop the decrease. Also stomping the foot isn't what the throttle controller is really intended for it's a nice by-product but under normal acceleration it makes the car respond better by opening that throttle faster. I'll post links to both after I did a simple google search for them. Like I said earlier me and my tuner noticed the same thin your seeing only on my runs it cut out after the 5500rpm range on pulls which is fairly typical of most cars without a tune. You can find my pulls on my Build Journal under the sticky in this section. I'll end by stating these aren't everyone's cup of tea and this isn't me promoting the product they are a bit pricey but it's a personal comfort/feeling mod more then anything else doesn't add power period.

Vitesse Throttle Controller

JMS PedalMax
There is still some confusion on how these devices work.

1. It can not command the throttle to open faster. You can test this on your own by timing the time it takes the throttle blade to open to WOT with and without the device. The stepper motor that drives your throttle has a limit which can not be exceeded by supplying extra voltage. If you could open the throttle faster or further, it would show in a simple 0-60 run. Now what it does do, is open the throttle wider than commanded. When you depress your accelerator pedal (using arbitrary numbers here due to the actual figures being proprietary) 25%, the device conditions the signal to show 40% to the ECU. Then the ECU commands the stepper motor to open to a 40% angle. Now the device can also tell the ECU that you commanded 40% throttle at X ramp rate opposed to your actual ramp rate of Y. Both of those changes combine to create the 'enhanced' pedal feel. At WOT, none of this matters.

2. It can not defeat Torque Management programmed into the ECU. You ECU will still command the throttle to close if the Torque delivered limit is exceeded. 100% does not matter how much voltage you send to the ECU. You're still gonna end up with intervention without an aftermarket calibration.

3. Your run cuts out higher due to your tuner partially removing Torque Management. Apparently there are some cells that have been left unaltered. You might want to learn to use the 'compare' feature of HPT on your own so you can validate what has been changed.
ChicagoTommy is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 04-10-2017, 05:37 PM   #13
psykostevo
 
Drives: Smart
Join Date: Mar 2017
Location: Phoenix, AZ
Posts: 59
Quote:
Originally Posted by Evil-Bee-NH View Post
There's two out that work well with the 2016+ 2.0T. What they basically do is modify the voltage sent to the throttle so it opens faster. You'll here all kinds of negative and positive on the devices like some will say just slam your foot down harder same result but it's not and it is that simple. With your TRQ MGMNT no amount of foot stomping will stop the decrease. Also stomping the foot isn't what the throttle controller is really intended for it's a nice by-product but under normal acceleration it makes the car respond better by opening that throttle faster. I'll post links to both after I did a simple google search for them. Like I said earlier me and my tuner noticed the same thin your seeing only on my runs it cut out after the 5500rpm range on pulls which is fairly typical of most cars without a tune. You can find my pulls on my Build Journal under the sticky in this section. I'll end by stating these aren't everyone's cup of tea and this isn't me promoting the product they are a bit pricey but it's a personal comfort/feeling mod more then anything else doesn't add power period.

Vitesse Throttle Controller

JMS PedalMax

Thanks for the links and the info. Considering the demanded torque can be programmed in the ECU, this might be a mostly useless option if you are getting tuned, but then again it probably has its unique intended uses where it comes in handy.
psykostevo is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 04-10-2017, 05:39 PM   #14
psykostevo
 
Drives: Smart
Join Date: Mar 2017
Location: Phoenix, AZ
Posts: 59
Quote:
Originally Posted by ChicagoTommy View Post
There is still some confusion on how these devices work.

1. It can not command the throttle to open faster. You can test this on your own by timing the time it takes the throttle blade to open to WOT with and without the device. The stepper motor that drives your throttle has a limit which can not be exceeded by supplying extra voltage. If you could open the throttle faster or further, it would show in a simple 0-60 run. Now what it does do, is open the throttle wider than commanded. When you depress your accelerator pedal (using arbitrary numbers here due to the actual figures being proprietary) 25%, the device conditions the signal to show 40% to the ECU. Then the ECU commands the stepper motor to open to a 40% angle. Now the device can also tell the ECU that you commanded 40% throttle at X ramp rate opposed to your actual ramp rate of Y. Both of those changes combine to create the 'enhanced' pedal feel. At WOT, none of this matters.

2. It can not defeat Torque Management programmed into the ECU. You ECU will still command the throttle to close if the Torque delivered limit is exceeded. 100% does not matter how much voltage you send to the ECU. You're still gonna end up with intervention without an aftermarket calibration.

3. Your run cuts out higher due to your tuner partially removing Torque Management. Apparently there are some cells that have been left unaltered. You might want to learn to use the 'compare' feature of HPT on your own so you can validate what has been changed.
I was wondering how that thing was getting around the ECU's torque limit and still keeping the throttle open. good to know that it DOESN'T.
psykostevo is offline   Reply With Quote
 
Post Reply


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump


All times are GMT -5. The time now is 10:30 PM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.9 Beta 4
Copyright ©2000 - 2026, vBulletin Solutions, Inc.