|
|
#1 |
![]() Drives: Smart Join Date: Mar 2017
Location: Phoenix, AZ
Posts: 59
|
Why you don't modify the LTG without tuning it
I recently began working with a customer who came to us with a modified car (as most do), who was ready for their tune. The mods were installed with the anticipation of having the tune done right away, so there is no real worry in this particular case, but it got me thinking about the people who buy just the bolt-ons and either don't buy the tune at all or buy it way down the road.
The stock pulls on this car show that with the bolt-ons this particular car is making a very healthy amount of power. That is, until it hits the ECU's factory torque output limit and torque management steps in to greatly reduce the amount of power that the engine is allowed to put to the ground. In the graph you can see that from about 3,750 RPM to about 5,750 RPM the power output of the car is significantly reduced. This will happen if your car produces more torque than the ECU's preset torque limit, and is a significant reason to make sure that you get a good tune to support your mods. Without a tune this driver would be scooting around with basically less than 200whp due to the torque management intervention, when they could easily be making well over 260 whp as is. The torque management on these cars is aggressive on the stock tune, and very unforgiving. ![]() What is actually happening here is that the ECU is sensing the additional torque output and is commanding the throttle body to start closing (much like it does during traction control). As the driver you may feel this as a sort of "nerfing" or dead spot in the powerband. In even more extreme cases the ECU will also start to report false knock retard in order to demand less airflow from the turbocharger. (there is a table that reduces allowed airflow from the turbo in the presence of knock, FYI). Here is what the ECU commanded Throttle % was, despite the fact that the driver's foot was at 100% throttle the entire time:
Last edited by psykostevo; 04-10-2017 at 12:47 PM. Reason: Pics weren't working |
|
|
|
|
|
#2 |
|
603 Camaros
Drives: 2017 NGM I4 1LT Coupe Join Date: May 2012
Location: Manchester, NH
Posts: 6,779
|
Throttle controller negates the throttle adjustment from the stock ecu but your write-up makes a ton of sense and me and my tuner saw the same thing.
__________________
MY 2017 I4 CAMARO BUILD JOURNAL | YOUTUBE | INSTAGRAM | 316RWHP - 385 RWTQ HPTUNERS DYNO TUNE | 12.693s @ 105MPH 1/4 Mile |
|
|
|
|
|
#3 |
![]() Drives: 2016 Camaro LTG Join Date: Jul 2016
Location: SE Michigan
Posts: 316
|
Torque management strikes again. Interesting charts. Thank you!
__________________
2016 LTG Camaro in Hyper Blue with MRT V3 Catback and Brembo SS Brakes.
|
|
|
|
|
|
#4 |
![]() Drives: Smart Join Date: Mar 2017
Location: Phoenix, AZ
Posts: 59
|
Got a link to the Throttle Controller product? I haven't had a customer bring one in yet, and I don't use them personally.
|
|
|
|
|
|
#5 | |
![]() Drives: Smart Join Date: Mar 2017
Location: Phoenix, AZ
Posts: 59
|
Quote:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
#6 |
![]() Drives: Smart Join Date: Mar 2017
Location: Phoenix, AZ
Posts: 59
|
Also something I found interesting is how perfectly overlapped after 5800 or so RPM these 2 pulls were. They were different below that rpm, but above that RPM they were 100% identically overlapped.
|
|
|
|
|
|
#7 |
|
Blessed ❤️
Drives: 2017 1LT RS I4 Join Date: Sep 2016
Location: Indiana
Posts: 2,577
|
Understanding it would void the warranty but how much hp stock can this car put down safely with a tune only?
__________________
2017 1LT RS I4 A8 BLACK ON BLACK
Kindness and compassion #OthersFirst |
|
|
|
|
|
#8 | |
|
603 Camaros
Drives: 2017 NGM I4 1LT Coupe Join Date: May 2012
Location: Manchester, NH
Posts: 6,779
|
Quote:
Vitesse Throttle Controller JMS PedalMax
__________________
MY 2017 I4 CAMARO BUILD JOURNAL | YOUTUBE | INSTAGRAM | 316RWHP - 385 RWTQ HPTUNERS DYNO TUNE | 12.693s @ 105MPH 1/4 Mile |
|
|
|
|
|
|
#9 |
|
603 Camaros
Drives: 2017 NGM I4 1LT Coupe Join Date: May 2012
Location: Manchester, NH
Posts: 6,779
|
I'd say stock with a tune your gonna max out your setting around 320RWHP. Different mods and different cars will have different limitations because they may come of the same assembly line but no two engines or cars are the same despite having the same build order and operation some just last and fly better then others.
__________________
MY 2017 I4 CAMARO BUILD JOURNAL | YOUTUBE | INSTAGRAM | 316RWHP - 385 RWTQ HPTUNERS DYNO TUNE | 12.693s @ 105MPH 1/4 Mile |
|
|
|
|
|
#10 |
|
Blessed ❤️
Drives: 2017 1LT RS I4 Join Date: Sep 2016
Location: Indiana
Posts: 2,577
|
Hmm, 320rwhp with a tune only? Steve can you verify this?
__________________
2017 1LT RS I4 A8 BLACK ON BLACK
Kindness and compassion #OthersFirst |
|
|
|
|
|
#11 |
|
603 Camaros
Drives: 2017 NGM I4 1LT Coupe Join Date: May 2012
Location: Manchester, NH
Posts: 6,779
|
Just remember dyno conditions and different cars. Look at what mine dyno'd stock but also take into consideration I've had awesome dyno pull conditions stock pull it was maybe 65 degrees no humidity cool air. Bolt-On was 50 degrees and slightly humid. Basically both were great conditions to have a dyno pull Saturdays pull was near perfect conditions 40 degrees cool weather and a cool breeze unfortunately HPTuners f@cked up my tuning day with sending the wrong file version.
__________________
MY 2017 I4 CAMARO BUILD JOURNAL | YOUTUBE | INSTAGRAM | 316RWHP - 385 RWTQ HPTUNERS DYNO TUNE | 12.693s @ 105MPH 1/4 Mile |
|
|
|
|
|
#12 | |
![]() ![]() ![]() Drives: 2017 Camaro; 2017 Acadia Denali Join Date: Jun 2016
Location: Chicago, IL/Williams Bay WI
Posts: 1,022
|
Quote:
1. It can not command the throttle to open faster. You can test this on your own by timing the time it takes the throttle blade to open to WOT with and without the device. The stepper motor that drives your throttle has a limit which can not be exceeded by supplying extra voltage. If you could open the throttle faster or further, it would show in a simple 0-60 run. Now what it does do, is open the throttle wider than commanded. When you depress your accelerator pedal (using arbitrary numbers here due to the actual figures being proprietary) 25%, the device conditions the signal to show 40% to the ECU. Then the ECU commands the stepper motor to open to a 40% angle. Now the device can also tell the ECU that you commanded 40% throttle at X ramp rate opposed to your actual ramp rate of Y. Both of those changes combine to create the 'enhanced' pedal feel. At WOT, none of this matters. 2. It can not defeat Torque Management programmed into the ECU. You ECU will still command the throttle to close if the Torque delivered limit is exceeded. 100% does not matter how much voltage you send to the ECU. You're still gonna end up with intervention without an aftermarket calibration. 3. Your run cuts out higher due to your tuner partially removing Torque Management. Apparently there are some cells that have been left unaltered. You might want to learn to use the 'compare' feature of HPT on your own so you can validate what has been changed. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
#13 | |
![]() Drives: Smart Join Date: Mar 2017
Location: Phoenix, AZ
Posts: 59
|
Quote:
Thanks for the links and the info. Considering the demanded torque can be programmed in the ECU, this might be a mostly useless option if you are getting tuned, but then again it probably has its unique intended uses where it comes in handy. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
#14 | |
![]() Drives: Smart Join Date: Mar 2017
Location: Phoenix, AZ
Posts: 59
|
Quote:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Post Reply
|
|
|