Homepage Garage Wiki Register Community Calendar Today's Posts Search
#Camaro6
Go Back   CAMARO6 > CAMARO6.com General Forums > ZL1 Discussions


Griffin Motorsports


Post Reply
 
Thread Tools
Old 09-05-2024, 07:49 AM   #1
Blakells
 
Drives: 2011 Camaro SS
Join Date: Jul 2017
Location: South Carolina
Posts: 19
Nurburgring Lap Time if the ZLE had carbon ceramics?

As a bit of a thought experiment/discussion I was curious what people think about this. The corvette z06/z07 package had carbon ceramic brakes, the z/28 had carbon ceramic brakes, yet the zl1 1le never got the option.

The zl1 1le in manual did a nurburgring time of 7:16.04 with the standard iron rotors. Assuming the carbon ceramics would save maybe 100lbs off the weight of the car and also save in rotational mass & inertia, how much time do you think would be shaved off if any?
Blakells is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 09-05-2024, 09:24 AM   #2
nighttowl
Sarcasm loading --------
 
nighttowl's Avatar
 
Drives: 2018 ZL1 1LE
Join Date: Dec 2011
Location: TX
Posts: 1,913
I think it would be more like 40-50 lbs, but certainly the unsprung weight reduction and additional braking power would most likely make a difference but I dont think it would be anything big.

If they were serious about setting a great time they would have used a professional driver.

No knocks on the engineer, he ran the car pretty hard around the track but rumors are that Oppenheiser ran a 7:08 in it after the 7:16 run before packing it up.

I suspect that although the were marketing that GM was "unleashing the camaro team" they were really still on a leash and did not want to openly demonstrate a solid beat down on the Corvette, which it clearly would have.
__________________
"The salesman actually told me to stop getting it sideways during the test drive"

2018 MBM ZL1 1LE - 652 rwhp, 588 rwtq SAE
2014 CRT ZL1 574 rwhp, 537 rwtq - SOLD
2010 IBM SS Camaro VVT L99 w/ TR6060 swap, 489 rwhp, 444 rwtq - SOLD
nighttowl is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 09-05-2024, 10:20 AM   #3
Blakells
 
Drives: 2011 Camaro SS
Join Date: Jul 2017
Location: South Carolina
Posts: 19
Quote:
Originally Posted by nighttowl View Post
I think it would be more like 40-50 lbs, but certainly the unsprung weight reduction and additional braking power would most likely make a difference but I dont think it would be anything big.

If they were serious about setting a great time they would have used a professional driver.

No knocks on the engineer, he ran the car pretty hard around the track but rumors are that Oppenheiser ran a 7:08 in it after the 7:16 run before packing it up.

I suspect that although the were marketing that GM was "unleashing the camaro team" they were really still on a leash and did not want to openly demonstrate a solid beat down on the Corvette, which it clearly would have.
interesting. I always heard they didn't push the car to the limits with the tires and such and could have shaved a few seconds off, but I never heard of rumours of running a 7:08 from anywhere before
Blakells is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 09-05-2024, 02:21 PM   #4
arpad_m


 
arpad_m's Avatar
 
Drives: 2018 Camaro 2SS A8
Join Date: Jul 2017
Location: East Tennessee
Posts: 13,478
I just don't see another 8 seconds in the car using that configuration, no matter the driver. The aero held it back a lot in the back straight, it could barely get up to 170 mph, and Bill Wise was almost bored flooring it and just willing the car to go faster there... he drove flat out everywhere, the tires sounded as being on the brink of breaking traction in every corner, he even had to correct a few times in the first few.

1-2 seconds faster with a professional driver, maybe, but 8... the car was a bigger bottleneck IMO. If we can even say the word "bottleneck" after such an astoundingly great lap time, that is.
__________________
2018 Camaro 2SS — G7E MX0 NPP F55 IO6
735 rwhp | 665 rwtq

Magnuson TVS 2300 80mm pulley | Kooks 1 7/8" LT headers | JRE smooth idle Terminator cam | LT4 FS & injectors | TSP forged pistons & rods
JMS PowerMAX | DSX flex fuel kit | Roto-Fab CAI | Soler 95mm LT5 TB | 1LE wheels | 1LE brakes | BMR rear cradle lockout | JRE custom tune

1100 - 1/30/18 | 2000 - 1/31/18
3000 - 2/06/18 TPW 2/26/18
3400 - 2/19/18 | 3800 - 2/26/18
4300 - 2/27/18 | 4B00 - 3/01/18
4200 - 3/05/18 | 4800 - 3/14/18
5000 - 3/16/18 | 6000 - 3/19/18
arpad_m is online now   Reply With Quote
Old 09-05-2024, 03:39 PM   #5
Z OH 6


 
Drives: 2024 CT5-V Blackwing
Join Date: Sep 2020
Location: GA
Posts: 3,557
Quote:
Originally Posted by arpad_m View Post
I just don't see another 8 seconds in the car using that configuration, no matter the driver. The aero held it back a lot in the back straight, it could barely get up to 170 mph, and Bill Wise was almost bored flooring it and just willing the car to go faster there... he drove flat out everywhere, the tires sounded as being on the brink of breaking traction in every corner, he even had to correct a few times in the first few.

1-2 seconds faster with a professional driver, maybe, but 8... the car was a bigger bottleneck IMO. If we can even say the word "bottleneck" after such an astoundingly great lap time, that is.
100% agree, I doubt there was much if any left in that lap time.
Z OH 6 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 09-05-2024, 03:41 PM   #6
Z OH 6


 
Drives: 2024 CT5-V Blackwing
Join Date: Sep 2020
Location: GA
Posts: 3,557
Quote:
Originally Posted by nighttowl View Post
I think it would be more like 40-50 lbs, but certainly the unsprung weight reduction and additional braking power would most likely make a difference but I dont think it would be anything big.

If they were serious about setting a great time they would have used a professional driver.

No knocks on the engineer, he ran the car pretty hard around the track but rumors are that Oppenheiser ran a 7:08 in it after the 7:16 run before packing it up.

I suspect that although the were marketing that GM was "unleashing the camaro team" they were really still on a leash and did not want to openly demonstrate a solid beat down on the Corvette, which it clearly would have.
If Al ran a 7:08 then that would be the official time. Rumors are fun but rarely ever true.
Z OH 6 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 09-05-2024, 04:09 PM   #7
nighttowl
Sarcasm loading --------
 
nighttowl's Avatar
 
Drives: 2018 ZL1 1LE
Join Date: Dec 2011
Location: TX
Posts: 1,913
Quote:
Originally Posted by Z OH 6 View Post
If Al ran a 7:08 then that would be the official time. Rumors are fun but rarely ever true.
I read about it repeatedly on this forum shortly after the ZLE came out.
Maybe its true, maybe not.

Didn't the 2018 AMG GT-R run a 7:10 at the same weight, with DSSV's and 70 less HP?
__________________
"The salesman actually told me to stop getting it sideways during the test drive"

2018 MBM ZL1 1LE - 652 rwhp, 588 rwtq SAE
2014 CRT ZL1 574 rwhp, 537 rwtq - SOLD
2010 IBM SS Camaro VVT L99 w/ TR6060 swap, 489 rwhp, 444 rwtq - SOLD
nighttowl is offline   Reply With Quote
 
Post Reply


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump


All times are GMT -5. The time now is 02:11 PM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.9 Beta 4
Copyright ©2000 - 2026, vBulletin Solutions, Inc.