|
|
#1 |
|
Having FUN in the SUN...
![]() Drives: 2022 M6 ZL1 1LE Join Date: Jan 2022
Location: San Diego CA
Posts: 2,190
|
Do I really need a BIG GULP ???
Hey team... I am planning the budget for my Phase.2 build (see below in my sig) Planning to max out my stock low end fueling (JMS only) and have heard I should be good to around 750rwhp. With that said... If I port the blower, and a pinch more boost and a cam... do I really need a Big Gulp this round? I assume it would only hold me back if I added a low end kit and wanted to hit 800+ correct?
__________________
2022 M6 ZLE: GMS Stage.III KONG X.PORT Package + DMS Lid + GMS Rear Bumper Belly Pan + GMS Hood Bracket + GMS Flex Fuel Package + MONSTER Triple S Clutch + XDI.50% Injectors + CLICK FOR BUILD LIST or www.GRIFFIN-MOTORSPORTS.com = 915rwhp 850rwtq + E60 + 15psi
|
|
|
|
|
|
#2 |
![]() Drives: 2017 ZL1 Join Date: Aug 2020
Location: Lakeside, Az
Posts: 513
|
I'm thinking you might, but just an FYI...I was making 688 rwhp at 45% ethanol and went to 60%, using a jms unit thinking I'd be ok if it went to 700+. Nope, leaned out 2 cylinders and $14k later...
|
|
|
|
|
|
#3 | |
![]() ![]() Drives: '86 IROC-Z '18 ZL1 Join Date: Jul 2019
Location: Arizona
Posts: 935
|
Quote:
Did it have the lean condition cause of the switch to E and not enough fuel *pressure*? I've veen debating switching to E but I hear alot of stories of blown engines cause of going to lean. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
#4 |
![]() Drives: 2017 ZL1 Join Date: Aug 2020
Location: Lakeside, Az
Posts: 513
|
She was good at several events at 48%. Should be better at 60%, right? Nope. Cool weather and good da and kaboom. 17% lower with the usual stuff and it looks like injectors on those 2 cylinders couldn't keep up. Ugh!
|
|
|
|
|
|
#5 |
|
Super Stock
Drives: Chevrolet Camaro ZL1 Join Date: May 2022
Location: Concordia
Posts: 1,004
|
If I remember right I think it's been confirmed that the OE intake is good up to 800 HP. The big gulp is nothing but noise up until that point.
__________________
2017 Red Hot ZL1 A10 - Apex ARC-8's, 305/ 325 PS4's, DSX 9.06 12% lower, Griptec OE upper, NGK HR7 Ruthenium plugs, Nostrum 25+ injectors, XDI Goliath HPFP, Katech dual in tank LPFP, Katech oil pump, LME tensioner, DOD delete, LT1 big fuel cam, Jokerz ported blower, MPI lid, GMS hood extractor bracket, Granatelli SS plug wires, Cordes LTR reservoir, DMS T-stat housing, 186* LS3 T-stat, Borla X pipe, Black Widow Angry Housewife/ Corsa NPP mufflers, BMR engine mounts, Banks iDash, Lithium Battery, AEM X- Series, HP Tuners, E85, 16.5 psi
758 HP/ 804 TQ |
|
|
|
|
|
#6 |
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() Drives: 2024 CT5-V Blackwing Join Date: Sep 2020
Location: GA
Posts: 3,557
|
Standard Rotofab is good up to about 750whp, it can't hurt to add a Big Gulp below that point as long as the car is tuned for it, but it may not offer much benefit either until after 750whp.
|
|
|
|
|
|
#7 |
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() Drives: 19' ZL1 A10, w/pdr Join Date: Sep 2014
Location: S.W. ohio
Posts: 1,722
|
Porting the blower and adding a 103 tb while having headers with high flow cats, then you want to restrict how much incoming air into the engine makes no sense. The more air you can pass thru the engine unrestricted the better your performance will be, this is mechanics 101.
__________________
BTR Stg II cam w/ 38% fuel lobe, ARH 2" headers into 3" w/Gesi cats, Kong X port, Weapon X triple ht exchangers, NW 103, Rotofab big gulp, DSX lowside, TCM tune, BMR Lockout, Mustang dyno 720 rwhp, 634 rwtq on 93 pump.
|
|
|
|
|
|
#8 |
![]() |
Yes big gulp is needed.
|
|
|
|
|
|
#9 |
|
Drives: 2022 Lt1 A10 Join Date: Nov 2015
Location: clark, mo
Posts: 8,882
|
I ran my original Rotofab to about 770. Hurt the motor and replaced the short block and that that time we went to the big gulp and made 850 plus. So I think you can go to at least 775 or maybe 800 max. Beyond that and according to Mike at Rotofab you really don't need it till your at that level
|
|
|
|
|
|
#10 |
|
Petro-sexual
|
You're going to be tuning anyways, so why not? You could sell your standard RF and put that toward a new one. You'll have to figure out how to get one here in CA. A lot of people say it's not worth it at that power. Maybe they're right, and you'll only pick up a handful or two Bald Eagles, but if you're going to a 103 - why not get a BG? I hear tuning (idle, I guess) can be a bit of a pain, but we didn't experience that. We did have to tune for it, after switching from the standard, so it seems to me there is something to be had, even for mild mods' like us.
My vote - if it's in your budget - why not? JMHO.
__________________
'20 ZL1 Black "Fury" A10, PDR, Exposed CF Extractor Magnuson Magnum DI TVS2650R // RFBG // Soler 103 // TooHighPSI Port Injection // THPSI Billet Lid // FF // Katech Drop-In // PLM Heat Exchanger // ZLE Cradle bushings // BMR Chassis-Suspension Stuff // aFe Bars // Diode Dynamics LEDs // ACS Composites Guards // CF Dash // Aeroforce // tint // other stuffs |
|
|
|
|
|
#11 | |
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() Drives: 2024 CT5-V Blackwing Join Date: Sep 2020
Location: GA
Posts: 3,557
|
Quote:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
#12 |
|
Oh Oh it's Friday Night!
Drives: 2018 ZL1 1LE Nightfall Gray Join Date: Jan 2018
Location: Walton Woods
Posts: 1,075
|
I think at the level you are planning your engine can efficiently handle and use increased airflow. As noted, you will be tuning your engine anyway, so the Big Gulp makes perfect sense.
__________________
2018 Camaro ZL1 1LE NFG; ARH 2” headers, catless mids, ARH full exhaust, Lingenfelter 18% lower pulley, ATI Harmonic Balancer, Roto-fab CAI, EE-catch can, TM ported TB, NX Lid, BMR strut tower brace. Aeroforce dual pod interceptor gauges. Tuned by Vengeance Racing!!! 644 HP @ 6250 rpm / 689 trq @ 3660 rpm
Four that wanna own me Two that wanna stone me One says she's a friend of mine... |
|
|
|
|
|
#13 |
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() Drives: 2016 1SS NFG A8 Join Date: Aug 2017
Location: 46804
Posts: 7,665
|
The Big Gulp isn't worth it until you at least port the supercharger and run a 103mm tb. If you put it on a stock supercharger and throttle body then yea it's not going to do much being there is a restriction upstream. I don't really base stuff off of a arbitrary power number. It has more to do with the setup and combination of parts.
__________________
2016 NFG SS A8/Whipple 2.9/Fuel System/Flex Fuel |
|
|
|
|
|
#14 |
![]() Drives: 2020 ZL1 1LE A10 Join Date: Feb 2021
Location: Lutz, FL
Posts: 79
|
I'm at 855 to the wheels using a JLT intake for a point of reference. The intake tube visually matches the diameter of a Katech 103. So a "regular" intake doesn't seem to be hurting my situation.
Mark |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Post Reply
|
|
|