|
|
#1 |
|
ROTN APL
Drives: 2017 red hot ss Join Date: Jun 2017
Location: south texas
Posts: 78
|
Which Roto-Fab? Big Gulp or Regular?
I want to change my air intake on my 2017 SS with a Magnuson supercharger. Im still using the stock throttle body but have a list of other mods (meth,cam,ect…) The car makes around 650 wheel horsepower right now but going back to the shop for some fuel upgrades along with E-85. Will I be making enough power to use the "Big-Gulp" Roto-Fab intake or should I just stick with the regular one that has already been proven? I hear about problems tuning the car with the big gulp if your not making enough power to utilize it.
|
|
|
|
|
|
#2 |
|
Moderator
Drives: 2017 Camaro 2SS A8 Join Date: Aug 2018
Location: New Ipswich NH
Posts: 6,350
|
Big Gulp with upsized throttle body should be a nice gain in power for you.
__________________
2017 Chevy Camaro 2SS A8 Whipple 3.0, Mast Black Label heads, ATI 8L90, Fore triple in-tank pumps, 112mm TB, LPE +52% injectors & BB HPFP, TooHighPSI/Katech port injection, 15” conversion 1066 WHP STD/1027 SAE, 9.10@152.5 (new times coming)
|
|
|
|
|
|
#3 |
|
Drives: 2022 Lt1 A10 Join Date: Nov 2015
Location: clark, mo
Posts: 8,882
|
At least 775 to 800 rwhp it will be a benefit if not stay with the 4". It will require a 103 tb if you want to do the 5". If your staying with the stock TB or a 95mm LT5 stay with the 4"
|
|
|
|
|
|
#4 |
|
ROTN APL
Drives: 2017 red hot ss Join Date: Jun 2017
Location: south texas
Posts: 78
|
Thanks guys. I was kind of thinking the same thing. The 103mm TB suggestion helps. Now I have to decide if I can dish out an extra $1500 (guessing) for the TB and porting work. The flex fuel kit and low side auxiliary system with tune is already going to set me back $3000 (I don't think that's too bad for the power gains I should get) If only I had deeper pockets it would be a no brainer.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Post Reply
|
|
|