You are browsing camaro6 
07-31-2017, 03:56 PM
|
#1 |
 
Drives: 2017 Camaro 2SS Join Date: Mar 2017
Location: IL
Posts: 88
|
GM or Rotofab intake
Does anyone know which one is best?
|
|
|
|
07-31-2017, 05:32 PM
|
#2 |
 Drives: 2016 1ss camaro Join Date: Dec 2015
Location: Phoenix
Posts: 156
|
Rotofab
|
|
|
|
|
07-31-2017, 06:17 PM
|
#3 |
 Drives: '17 2SS, NGM, MRC, DPP; '19 F150 Join Date: Apr 2017
Location: Katy (Houston), TX
Posts: 440
|
You're gonna get opinions, not an answer...
|
|
|
|
|
07-31-2017, 06:23 PM
|
#4 |
 
Drives: 2017 Hyper Blue 1LE Join Date: Dec 2016
Location: Tampa
Posts: 579
|
What's the final answer if the GM one is wet or dry dock?
|
|
|
|
|
07-31-2017, 06:26 PM
|
#5 | |
 
Drives: SW 1SS 1LE / Jeep XJ Join Date: Mar 2016
Location: WPB,FL
Posts: 799
|
Quote:
|
|
|
|
|
|
07-31-2017, 06:32 PM
|
#6 | |
|
Drives: '17 2SS, NGM, MRC, DPP; '19 F150 Join Date: Apr 2017
Location: Katy (Houston), TX
Posts: 440
|
Quote:
Mine sure appears to be dry. The rubber part of the filter felt "greasy", but so do a lot of other new rubber parts when you take them out of the packaging. |
|
|
|
|
|
07-31-2017, 07:31 PM
|
#7 |
|
SABIO
Drives: 2016 CAMARO 1SS Join Date: Jul 2015
Location: Bradford, ON
Posts: 5,012
|
Rotofab.
This question has been answered many times with dynos to back it up.
__________________
|
|
|
|
|
07-31-2017, 08:09 PM
|
#8 |
 |
To be fair, the GM intake comes with the MAF correction you need to make more power safely since the CAI design throws off the signal. We could use a dyno of the GM CAI with the OEM tune applied to know for sure what the delta is vs. rotofab when properly setup.
Now, it is important to also note that the Rotofab doesn't require this MAF correction at all but to be balanced, it also doesn't carry the GM warranty on it either.
__________________
It's been fun, done with GM.
2018 Camaro ZL1 (SOLD) - Blown Airbags 2017 Camaro SS F1FTY Member Journal (SOLD) - Bad Motor |
|
|
|
|
07-31-2017, 08:50 PM
|
#9 | |
|
Drives: '17 2SS, NGM, MRC, DPP; '19 F150 Join Date: Apr 2017
Location: Katy (Houston), TX
Posts: 440
|
Quote:
|
|
|
|
|
|
07-31-2017, 09:16 PM
|
#10 | |
|
Drives: SW 1SS 1LE / Jeep XJ Join Date: Mar 2016
Location: WPB,FL
Posts: 799
|
Quote:
|
|
|
|
|
|
07-31-2017, 09:46 PM
|
#11 | |
|
SABIO
Drives: 2016 CAMARO 1SS Join Date: Jul 2015
Location: Bradford, ON
Posts: 5,012
|
Quote:
So there isn't any. Rotofab does.
__________________
|
|
|
|
|
|
07-31-2017, 09:52 PM
|
#12 | |
|
Drives: '17 2SS, NGM, MRC, DPP; '19 F150 Join Date: Apr 2017
Location: Katy (Houston), TX
Posts: 440
|
Quote:
|
|
|
|
|
|
07-31-2017, 10:01 PM
|
#13 |
      
Drives: 16 Camaro SS w/ Roto-fab CAI Join Date: May 2009
Location: Arizona
Posts: 2,682
|
Here are some dyno results comparing the Roto-fab CAI to the stock intake system. These results have come from a variety of tuners, from Texas, to Connecticut, to Korea!
 From JDP Motorsports, Bone Stock vs. Roto-fab, Stock tune  From CNC Motors, Bone stock vs. Roto-fab, Stock tune  From SCT Performance, Bone stock vs. Roto-fab, Stock tune, AFR included below.  From Abdulisraddd, supporting mods: secondary cat delete. stock tune.  From EFI Tuning, PTB+Intake+Tune vs. PTB + Intake + Tune + Roto-fab, AFR included below.  From JRE, stock intake vs. Roto-fab CAI. Supporting mods unknown.  From ADM Performance, LT4 S/C vs. LT4 S/C with Roto-fab  From Davenport Motorsports, Heartbeat S/C vs. Heartbeat S/C with Roto-fab Thanks for your interest everyone, Michael |
|
|
|
|
07-31-2017, 10:17 PM
|
#14 |
|
Drives: '17 2SS, NGM, MRC, DPP; '19 F150 Join Date: Apr 2017
Location: Katy (Houston), TX
Posts: 440
|
But I guess your CAI for the V6 doesn't make any additional power right? I mean GM doesn't advertise any power gain do they?
Not saying yours is not a good product, but I also believe the GM version works fine as well. No one has shown any definitive proof of which is "best". |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Post Reply
|
|
|
