05-03-2017, 08:16 AM | #1 |
Drives: 2017 ZL1 A10 & 2021 BMW M340i x Dr Join Date: Mar 2009
Location: Tampa
Posts: 5,111
|
HP Wars and Cafe Standards
Just curious to how many more years can the Big 3 keep it up since the Cafe standards are getting more stringent. I read some where they need to hit 54.5 mpg by 2025. What are your thoughts, think by 2019 the hp levels will be going back down again?
__________________
Sold 2012 2LT RS 12.3@112 old setup
Sold 1967 Camaro Pro Street. Ran 10's mild BB on NOS. 2017 HyperBlue ZL1 A10 ** Born 3/17/17**Delivered 4/08/17 2020 Build: Mag2650, BTR Stage2, NW103, BG, 14% lower, 90mm upper, ARH 2" Long system w/no cats, SW Legend mufflers. **807hp/762tq on 93 gas** and **848hp/792tq on e47** Sold 2018 (Go Mango) Dodge Charger Daytona 392 Daily Driver Daily Driver 2021 BMW M340i Xdrive |
05-03-2017, 08:33 AM | #2 |
|
Actually those new targets may get dropped along with other changes thanks to Trump's administration. Time will tell how this plays out.
http://www.businessinsider.com/trump...mpanies-2017-3
__________________
Current: '17 2SS Hyper Blue, A8, MRC, NPP
Past: '99 SS Camaro A4, '73 Camaro 383 A3 "Voices in your head are not considered insider information." 3800 Status - 6/16/16 (Built!) 6000 status - 6/29/16 (Delivered!) |
05-03-2017, 09:04 AM | #3 |
Banned
Drives: 2017 Camaro 2SS 6MT Join Date: Aug 2006
Location: Cleveland, Ohio
Posts: 4,372
|
The current administration is already in the process of softening the hardline oversight of the EPA. Like supersound said time will only tell what we'll have in the end, but I don't see the 54.5 mandate lasting.
Also, with cheaper gas and the $7500 tax credit for hybrids expiring, there is simply less motivation in the market place for people to buy a high MPG car. SUVs still rule the road, in America, and that's not changing. Hybrids and the like are not a very big slice of the pie chart of vehicle sales. Like Bob Lutz once said, forcing people to buy high mileage cars with high MPG mandates is like forcing people to lose weight by mandating clothes companies that pants can be no larger than 32 inches. This is the USA. We like our cars big and powerful. This isn't Europe, no matter how some of our, uh, previously elected officials wanted to force us into acting like it is. |
05-03-2017, 09:23 AM | #4 |
Drives: 2011 Camaro SS Join Date: Apr 2013
Location: North Carolina
Posts: 1,849
|
Like the others said, it's pretty much guaranteed that the MPG mandate will be removed by the Trump administration. But I think it's just a matter of a delay -- how long depends on whether he is a one-term president or not.
I think that partially, just as a consequence of where the industry is headed and also keeping global market demand and requirements in mind, the fleet-wide MPG rating of most auto manufacturers will inevitably go up considerably. However, here in the U.S., for cars like the Camaro which really have almost no sales elsewhere, a little bit of the pressure is now off the engineers. |
05-03-2017, 10:19 AM | #5 | |
Banned
Drives: 2017 Camaro 2SS 6MT Join Date: Aug 2006
Location: Cleveland, Ohio
Posts: 4,372
|
Quote:
Well, considering the director of the EPA is now a person who has been against its very existence I think they can decimate the department irreparably. Depending on which side you're on obviously determines whether you think this is good or not. I personally believe the EPA does have it's merits in cases like water and wildlife preservation. Being a native Clevelander I'm very aware of the Cuyahoga River fire in 1969 and how it was a strong factor in the founding of the EPA in 1974. Today the Cuyahoga is clean, clear, and full of fish and other wildlife, thanks to the EPA. Our local high school rowing teams use it for practice. But in other cases like the auto industry, the EPA is bloated, overreaching, over mandating, and could definitely use some drastic slashing. |
|
05-03-2017, 10:22 AM | #6 |
|
Think you could say that about every government agency lol.
__________________
Current: '17 2SS Hyper Blue, A8, MRC, NPP
Past: '99 SS Camaro A4, '73 Camaro 383 A3 "Voices in your head are not considered insider information." 3800 Status - 6/16/16 (Built!) 6000 status - 6/29/16 (Delivered!) |
05-03-2017, 10:23 AM | #7 |
Hot Dog
Drives: '17 1SS 1LE Join Date: Feb 2016
Location: Metro Detroit
Posts: 1,937
|
Given there's no emissions measurement for a car at WOT, there's pretty much no correlation between HP and EPA measured emissions and fuel economy.
The corporate FE average can be offset with credits and/or simply paying fines. It doesn't require every car meet any particular lower FE threshold, just a maximum tailpipe emission during the predefined drive cycles. As such, in reality, OEMs can continue to make gazillion HP cars as long as there's a market to buy them.
__________________
2017 "M1SS1LE" in Hyper Blue w/PDR
|
05-03-2017, 10:27 AM | #8 |
I used to be Dragoneye...
|
Let's be mindful of how deeply we dive into politics...
A few things to focus on - #1, the 54.5 # is not the same as the numbers we read on window stickers. Most car companies are on track to meet that goal. #2, the target is on a sliding scale, relative to vehicle footprint. The larger footprint made by the track width multiplied by the wheelbase, the less mpg that car should meet. #3, trucks have their own set of standards, far lower than cars. #4, this may all be moot in a matter of months, anyways, when the standards are undone...or at the very least, made to be more realistic. Here's what I'm most curious about...costs have been driven up by these fuel economy standards. In addition to more expensive technologies...companies charge more for gas guzzlers than may be necessary, because it reduces volume of that particular model - helping the CAFE figure. If that is undone...will prices settle back down? |
05-03-2017, 10:44 AM | #9 |
Drives: 2012 Ford Focus Join Date: Jan 2014
Location: Texas
Posts: 394
|
You've also got to remember that despite the US possible stepping back on CAFE standards, the rest of the world isn't. Looks like a lot of these car companies are beginning to streamline their offerings and it could make better fiscal sense to offer the same engines here and abroad as well.
The car companies have also been working on these requirements for years already and are most likely not going to cancel them with the possibility that 4 years from now we have a new president who raises CAFE standards to where they were with the Obama administration. I'm thinking hardly anything will really change. |
05-03-2017, 10:51 AM | #10 | |
Drives: 2011 2SS/RS LS3 Join Date: Nov 2011
Location: Torrance
Posts: 14,441
|
Quote:
Not sure how this ties in with CAFE or HP, but California and likely the other states have no plans to give up their federal exemption to allow lower emissions standards to be set. As you mentioned, automakers have already planned ahead and probably won't risk scrapping any technology in the works. If anything changes, it may be that simply the status quo will remain in affect longer for the forseeable future... |
|
06-06-2017, 01:18 PM | #11 | |
Drives: 2017 Camaro ZL1 Join Date: Mar 2013
Location: Weatherford Texas
Posts: 16
|
Quote:
__________________
|
|
06-06-2017, 01:20 PM | #12 |
Drives: 2019 ZL-1 Join Date: Feb 2009
Location: Troy, MI & Naples, FL
Posts: 2,019
|
Can we send it to NORTH KOREA.....?
Kim Jung Un and NAZI PELOSI.... what a pair....
__________________
2019 ZL-1 Acquired 4/23/21 at 6300 miles. Riverside Blue, A10, PDR. Traded in 2017 2SS with 6M and 32k miles. Continental Extreme Contact Sports. Now has 10,000 miles...
2012 Yukon XL Denali w/ 6.2 AWD |
06-06-2017, 01:26 PM | #13 |
Drives: 2013 1SS Join Date: Dec 2012
Location: New Jersey
Posts: 718
|
|
06-06-2017, 01:33 PM | #14 | |
Drives: Hopefully 6th gen Camaro Join Date: May 2015
Location: Socal
Posts: 586
|
Quote:
Found this link... http://www.roadandtrack.com/new-cars...ustang-hybrid/ I wonder if this is really going to happen, since Fields is gone. |
|
|
|
Post Reply
|
|
|