|
|
#1 |
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() Drives: 4 wheels Join Date: Dec 2009
Location: Earth
Posts: 1,351
|
Any reason why the camaro doesn't have lane change cameras and a civic does?
Just wondering why a friends brand new 2016 civic has cameras on the side mirrors that display a live feed on the console when you hit the corresponding turn signal..
But the camaros don't? This a penny pinching move from GM? This would literally cure ALL "blind spot" arguments anyone has about the Camaro IMO |
|
|
|
|
|
#2 |
|
Retired from Car mfrs....
Drives: 2LT RS/HR-V Join Date: May 2013
Location: /Fort Lauderdale
Posts: 10,044
|
No reason....diff mfrs have diff std/option sets...
|
|
|
|
|
|
#3 |
![]() Drives: 2014 Yellow L99 Join Date: Jan 2013
Location: nowhere
Posts: 545
|
two different auto makers, two different goals. camaro is made to look appealing inside/out and be fast. the civic, gas efficient and "user friendly".
between push to start, heated/cooled seats, blind spot detection, mag ride, apple car play and other features. silly to compare this to a civic feature wise in my opinion. |
|
|
|
|
|
#4 | |
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() Drives: 4 wheels Join Date: Dec 2009
Location: Earth
Posts: 1,351
|
Quote:
How can a camera on the side mirror which isn't noticeable, NOT something a manufacturer would want to put on a car that is KNOWN to have a blind spot RIGHT there? This seems like a feature that should be standard across all cars, period.. You're talking looks, speed.. I never brought any of that up. I brought up shit that should be standard across a broad spectrum. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
#5 |
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() Drives: 4 wheels Join Date: Dec 2009
Location: Earth
Posts: 1,351
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
#6 |
![]() Drives: 2016 Camaro 2SS Red Hot Join Date: Dec 2014
Location: San Fernando Valley, CA
Posts: 476
|
Not noticeable? I can very well easily see that ugly thing hanging off the side mirrors. Use your mirrors and turn your head and stop being lazy.
__________________
1989 Iroc-Z Z28 1LE/HP (Sold)
2010 2SS Rally Yellow: Corsa/Vararam (Sold) Current: 2016 Camaro 2SS Red Hot Current: 2016 Tahoe LT Current: 2018 Mini Countryman S ![]() |
|
|
|
|
|
#7 |
![]() Drives: 2014 Yellow L99 Join Date: Jan 2013
Location: nowhere
Posts: 545
|
Should've gotten a civic I guess
Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk |
|
|
|
|
|
#8 |
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() Drives: 2016 Camaro 1LT Join Date: Jan 2016
Location: California
Posts: 3,514
|
I can change lanes just fine without it. Maybe it's a feature for someone who's too distracted with checking out their facebook messages and yelling at their kids or BS'ing with their friends to bother paying attention to their side mirrors. Or maybe civic drivers just like driving with the seat all the way reclined so they can't see their side mirrors that well and thus need cameras.
meh. I'd much rather have a full heads up display that covered the entire front windshield with object detection. With minority report style user interface. That would be fun. |
|
|
|
|
|
#9 |
|
Retired from Car mfrs....
Drives: 2LT RS/HR-V Join Date: May 2013
Location: /Fort Lauderdale
Posts: 10,044
|
I had a 13 accord with the cameras the came on for blind spot and turned it off. I don't always want to come in on when somebody was beside me , I can look in the mirror. Like I said, different manufacturers promote different features.
|
|
|
|
|
|
#10 |
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() Drives: Love the one you're with Join Date: Sep 2009
Location: Downtown Charlie Brown
Posts: 11,849
|
Ugly boring cars need some kind of gimmick to suck people into buying them. If you need such a device to drive then you shouldn't have a license.
|
|
|
|
|
|
#11 | |
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() Drives: 4 wheels Join Date: Dec 2009
Location: Earth
Posts: 1,351
|
Quote:
No wonder GM can get away with so much. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
#12 |
![]() Drives: 2016 Camaro Join Date: Jan 2016
Location: British Columbia
Posts: 67
|
I've researched quite a few cars when deciding what I wanted and found you generally have to make a tradeoff between convenience features and performance unless you're willing to spend a lot. A lot of sedans are loaded with convenience and safety features but don't deliver in the performance or feel of driving versus a camaro or very sporty coupe.
When you do look at more performance focused cars like the Camaro, they tend not to offer as many of those features for more of a focus on the 'driving experience'. I imagine that is part due to a desire to offer the most bang for your buck performance wise, and also that the target market for this car not placing as much importance on extra features. That's not to say the Camaro is lacking in available technology and features.. heated steering wheel/seats, heads up display, android auto/carplay, rear camera & sensor, lane change, cross traffic, auto dimming mirror, collision warning, etc.. You can't expect everything in my opinion, there will always be other features other automakers have added on that aren't in the model you want. I'm sure additional cameras for improved visibility will become more common in cars going forward. I saw the rear-view mirror camera feature on the CT6 and that looks awesome, but all that stuff will take time before it becomes more prevalent on new models.
__________________
Nightfall Grey 2SS | MRC | NPP | NAV
|
|
|
|
|
|
#13 |
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() Drives: camaro Join Date: May 2013
Location: Stony Brook,NY
Posts: 1,756
|
Go buy a civic then. Problem solved.
__________________
2016 2SS,A8,NAV,NPP,MAG Ride,Sunroof
Hyperblue/JetBlack |
|
|
|
|
|
#14 |
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() Drives: Gen 6 Camaro RS Join Date: Dec 2015
Location: Miami FL
Posts: 1,725
|
Camaro is not a VOLVO!
![]() ![]()
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Post Reply
|
|
|