You are browsing camaro6 
10-16-2015, 12:03 AM
|
#2 |
 Drives: 2015 jeep wrangler unlimited Join Date: Jul 2015
Location: Worcester Massachusetts
Posts: 9
|
Hahahaha I was waiting to see who would be the first to post.
|
|
|
|
10-16-2015, 12:04 AM
|
#3 |
 
Drives: Duramax Join Date: Jun 2015
Location: Michigan
Posts: 174
|
I was going to post a 12:01 am, where the hell are the reviews? haha
I'm staying up late for this. |
|
|
|
|
10-16-2015, 12:04 AM
|
#4 |
 
Drives: 2016 1SS Yellow Join Date: Aug 2015
Location: CA
Posts: 629
|
wooooooooooooooooooooohooooooooooooooooooooooooooo oooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooo ooooooooooo!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!
|
|
|
|
|
10-16-2015, 12:07 AM
|
#5 |
      
Drives: 2016 F150 Join Date: May 2014
Location: Iowa
Posts: 2,196
|
|
|
|
|
|
10-16-2015, 12:07 AM
|
#6 |
Drives: 08 Accord V6/M6 / 04 Canyon Z71 Join Date: Aug 2008
Location: Palm Beach, FL
Posts: 1,078
|
|
|
|
|
|
10-16-2015, 12:14 AM
|
#7 |
|
Drives: Duramax Join Date: Jun 2015
Location: Michigan
Posts: 174
|
I'm very surprised they sent MT a base 1SS, and not only that, it weights less than what GM claimed.
|
|
|
|
|
10-16-2015, 12:15 AM
|
#8 |
|
Drives: 2016 F150 Join Date: May 2014
Location: Iowa
Posts: 2,196
|
3,672 lb for the SS Motor Trend tested.. There goes the theory of the 3,800 pound no option SS..
I'm guessing it cut a few pounds over curb weight with the dual mode exhaust. |
|
|
|
|
10-16-2015, 12:27 AM
|
#9 |
Drives: Chevy Join Date: Mar 2015
Location: Memphis, Tennessee
Posts: 794
|
Well no more doubting the weight.
Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk |
|
|
|
|
10-16-2015, 12:31 AM
|
#10 |
 Drives: 2003 Pete Join Date: Sep 2014
Location: IL
Posts: 350
|
Car & Driver
"But enough of that. This isn’t a family sedan. This is a performance car and, hoo boy, what a performer it is. Our test car, an SS with the General’s new eight-speed automatic (a $1495 option), rocketed to 60 mph in 3.9 seconds, a noticeable half-second quicker than any current Mustang GT we’ve tested. It makes it through the quarter-mile in 12.3 seconds, close to a second quicker than the Mustang GT. At 455 horsepower and 455 lb-ft of torque, the Camaro SS’s 6.2-liter small-block produces 20 more horses and 55 lb-ft more thrust than does the GT’s 5.0-liter. The Chevy’s pushrod V-8 also makes great wads more grunt down low than the Ford’s overhead-cam engine."
http://www.caranddriver.com/reviews/...ic-test-review |
|
|
|
|
10-16-2015, 12:34 AM
|
#11 |
|
General Motors Aficionado
Drives: 2023 GMC Canyon, 2023 Expedition Join Date: Aug 2008
Location: Florida
Posts: 37,375
 |
__________________
 2023 GMC Canyon Elevation 2023 Ford Expedition SSV (State-Issued) |
|
|
|
|
10-16-2015, 12:40 AM
|
#12 |
|
Drives: 99z28 with bolt-ons and a mwc fab 9 Join Date: Jul 2012
Location: Florida
Posts: 1,277
|
Holly hell!!! That 0-60 is NASTY!!!
__________________
I like my woman like my milk shakes, THICK!!!!
|
|
|
|
|
10-16-2015, 12:42 AM
|
#13 |
|
:chevy:
Drives: 2LT/RS Join Date: Jun 2008
Location: Toronto
Posts: 13,035
|
Beast! Was hoping for actual video reviews
__________________
CAMARO
Consult your doctor before taking Camaro Side effects include Sudden increase in Heart Rate, Insomnia and occasional hallucinations If you experience Permagrin exceeding 4 hours after taking Camaro, seek immediate Camaro5 Help CAMARO Bringing excitment back into the Garage |
|
|
|
|
10-16-2015, 12:47 AM
|
#14 |
Drives: 2016 Camaro SS Join Date: Apr 2015
Location: Petaluma, California
Posts: 516
|
The new Camaro SS has brakes, too; the standard Brembo stoppers brought the Chevy to a standstill in 104 feet from 60 mph.
Hell Yes!
__________________
Hyper Blue 2SS Auto, Duel Mode Exhaust, MCR, Nav, Black 5 Spoke
Ordered on 8/29 2000 Status on 9/1 3000 Status on 9/3 3300 Status on 10/8 3400 Status on 10/9 3800 Status on 10/19 Delivery 12/28 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Post Reply
|
|
|
