02-09-2018, 10:19 AM | #15 |
Drives: 2016 camaro 2.0t gray Join Date: Apr 2017
Location: Jacksonville,Fl
Posts: 399
|
I can only speak from my experience with them, if anyone is interested in that I can make a separate post, I don't mean to jack the OPs poat
|
02-09-2018, 10:36 AM | #16 |
Drives: 2018 2SS Join Date: Oct 2017
Location: Grand rapids, MI
Posts: 219
|
6th_gen_gino:
did you dyno your car on a stock tune, and with a FINISHED tune from us? 12 HP is most definitely NOT typical for gains, and i feel there is something more that one of us was missing, or lost in communication. that is literally like 1/4th the gains you should have seen from a simple tune (unless you are running 91 octane or something) |
02-09-2018, 10:37 AM | #17 |
Drives: 2018 2SS Join Date: Oct 2017
Location: Grand rapids, MI
Posts: 219
|
OP:
get ahold of 'vaspen' as he lives in PA, see if you are close enough to meet up, and go for a ride in his car. his car made over 300 to the tires on our dyno with basic bolt on mods, and a tune. |
02-09-2018, 12:44 PM | #18 | ||
Drives: 2016 camaro 2.0t gray Join Date: Apr 2017
Location: Jacksonville,Fl
Posts: 399
|
Quote:
Quote:
|
||
02-09-2018, 01:01 PM | #19 |
Drives: 2018 2SS Join Date: Oct 2017
Location: Grand rapids, MI
Posts: 219
|
i certainly apologize for that, we try to do our best with communication. our LTG tuner is SWAMPED lately, and may be occasionally short with people, just trying to make sure he gets everybodys changes to their tunes out every day. he is also the guy engineering the big turbo, the cams, and many other projects in other platforms. he means no harm in being short with people.
|
02-09-2018, 01:20 PM | #20 | |
Drives: 2016 camaro 2.0t gray Join Date: Apr 2017
Location: Jacksonville,Fl
Posts: 399
|
Quote:
|
|
02-09-2018, 02:46 PM | #21 |
Drives: 2018 2SS Join Date: Oct 2017
Location: Grand rapids, MI
Posts: 219
|
matt forwarded me the chain, and there was over 10 replys from july 18th, until july 21st. including some at 10pm. Matt even asked how you were liking the tune, and this was the response he received. it is very strange that you are just now saying that you are unsatisfied with the tune. if you were not happy, i really wish you would have taken that up with Matt at the time of the tune, so that he could address any issues you were having! we are more than willing to work through any issues, but it is super important that you tell us there is an issue! I read your entire correspondence (well 'jessicas' correspondence) with Matt and Becky, and not one time did it appear that you guys were anything less than fully satisfied. the whole process looked like it actually went very smooth.
"Hey Matt, So far i am extremely satisfied with the way the car is performing. I can most definitely feel the improvement on the way the car pulls. I have looked at the logs recorded and i am pleased with the lambda values that the car is running at, the fact that there is very little to no KR and the the car just runs amazingly. The only question i had was regarding the spark advance. I do see that at WOT i am running a maximum of 7* and i just wanted to ask if this was normal or if there was any room for improvement as far as timing went. All in all i am more than happy with the tune and i will be looking forward to any communication from you tomorrow. Best wishes." |
02-09-2018, 04:04 PM | #22 | |
Drives: 2016 camaro 2.0t gray Join Date: Apr 2017
Location: Jacksonville,Fl
Posts: 399
|
Quote:
|
|
02-09-2018, 06:20 PM | #23 |
Drives: 2017 l4 blue 6speed Join Date: Oct 2016
Location: p.a
Posts: 199
|
whisky I should note on the dyno when I was tuned my mods were silicone intake , chargepipes, intercooler, throttlebody, highflowcat, and a custom exhaust pre tune
2nd dyno run I put the zzp cai on that was the only diff still need to data log and retune for matt |
02-09-2018, 06:25 PM | #24 |
Drives: 2017 l4 blue 6speed Join Date: Oct 2016
Location: p.a
Posts: 199
|
hey rayrunner find me on facebook on the group names jessy I post dam near every day haha ur about 2-3 hr away from me I think
|
02-13-2018, 08:38 AM | #25 |
Drives: 2017 2.0T Coupe Join Date: Mar 2016
Location: Chicago
Posts: 31
|
Agree
In addition, good luck finding someone to do it locally - I'm in Chicago and there isn't anyone even close who's willing to touch the 2.0t...
ZZP is going to be my choice once the weather starts clearing up a bit. Checked some of the others and some have not been responsive, some have been stupidly overpriced, and some I just won't deal with based on their attitude. ZZP has been great from a response standpoint and always a pleasure to deal with... My opinion - others will disagree and that's cool |
02-13-2018, 09:59 AM | #26 |
603 Camaros
Drives: 2017 NGM I4 1LT Coupe Join Date: May 2012
Location: Manchester, NH
Posts: 6,779
|
Nobody will disagree with your choice to use ZZP jist not everyone can be thrilled and happy and not every car reacts exactly the same getting on the dyno at ZZP will always be better then getting an email tune from ZZP.
__________________
MY 2017 I4 CAMARO BUILD JOURNAL | YOUTUBE | INSTAGRAM | 316RWHP - 385 RWTQ HPTUNERS DYNO TUNE | 12.693s @ 105MPH 1/4 Mile |
02-13-2018, 10:11 AM | #27 |
Drives: 2017 2.0T Coupe Join Date: Mar 2016
Location: Chicago
Posts: 31
|
ZZP definitely has the consensus here as the best choice which is why I'm going that route.
I do wish there was someone reasonably local though....I have at least 3 tuning shops I've worked with in the past that want nothing to do with either the Ecoboost or the 2.0t Camaro. Pretty disappointing but at least when I had the Mustang I had plenty of aftermarket handheld options. SCT really woke that car up. Why so few handheld options for the 2.0t? Last edited by jaycee0919; 02-13-2018 at 10:40 AM. |
02-13-2018, 11:12 AM | #28 | |
603 Camaros
Drives: 2017 NGM I4 1LT Coupe Join Date: May 2012
Location: Manchester, NH
Posts: 6,779
|
Quote:
__________________
MY 2017 I4 CAMARO BUILD JOURNAL | YOUTUBE | INSTAGRAM | 316RWHP - 385 RWTQ HPTUNERS DYNO TUNE | 12.693s @ 105MPH 1/4 Mile |
|
|
|
Post Reply
|
|
|