Homepage Garage Wiki Register Community Calendar Today's Posts Search
#Camaro6
Go Back   CAMARO6 > Specific Packages / Variants > 6th gen Camaro 1LE


Bigwormgraphix


Post Reply
 
Thread Tools
Old 07-31-2017, 08:46 AM   #29
DFW1LE

 
DFW1LE's Avatar
 
Drives: 2017 SS 1LE Mosiac Black
Join Date: Nov 2016
Location: DFW, TX
Posts: 1,132
Quote:
Originally Posted by Moreno Motorsports View Post
To those wondering about the .5" drop, we are working on machined aluminum rear adjustable lower control arms with the ability to lower ride height in the rear by .5" and adjust rear camber to go along with the camber plates. this will give you guys a way to lower ride height .5" all around without changing spring rate stay tuned for that
Any projection on when these will be available? Want to lower my car all around to maintain balance.
DFW1LE is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 07-31-2017, 12:54 PM   #30
glamcem

 
glamcem's Avatar
 
Drives: '19 RivrsdBlu 1LE ('17 1LE HB sold)
Join Date: Nov 2016
Location: Seattle
Posts: 1,686
Quote:
Originally Posted by Ryephile View Post
They both have their advantages. The Multimatic's make it fairly easy to switch front camber at the track and only mess up the toe a little bit, whereas the camber plates need an alignment rack to get it right and symmetrical.

Cem, when you do your rack alignment with the Multimatic's, you'll have to choose when you want your toe to be correct, track or street setting. Moving from track to street setting will increase toe-out a smidge.
hmm, good info thanks!
I wonder how much of a toe we're talking about if it's only a small amount of toe (say for .05 degree), I would simply have it setup my track camber to -3.0 and have the toe set at 0 so that in street it wouldn't be too much and I wouldn't sacrifice the longevity.

It's too bad, it's not the opposite :/ Like having 0 toe for street and a bit toe out with the track setting. It would be just perfect
glamcem is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 07-31-2017, 01:17 PM   #31
Ryephile
Hot Dog
 
Ryephile's Avatar
 
Drives: '17 1SS 1LE
Join Date: Feb 2016
Location: Metro Detroit
Posts: 1,937
Quote:
Originally Posted by glamcem View Post
hmm, good info thanks!
I wonder how much of a toe we're talking about if it's only a small amount of toe (say for .05 degree), I would simply have it setup my track camber to -3.0 and have the toe set at 0 so that in street it wouldn't be too much and I wouldn't sacrifice the longevity.

It's too bad, it's not the opposite :/ Like having 0 toe for street and a bit toe out with the track setting. It would be just perfect
You know what, I was mistaken with the direction, sorry about that. With the steering rack on the front side of the axle, pulling the struts inboard (more negative camber) would cause toe-out, so you're in luck. Going to street alignment would increase toe-in.

Where the tie-rods are makes all the difference!
__________________
2017 "M1SS1LE" in Hyper Blue w/PDR
Ryephile is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 07-31-2017, 01:31 PM   #32
glamcem

 
glamcem's Avatar
 
Drives: '19 RivrsdBlu 1LE ('17 1LE HB sold)
Join Date: Nov 2016
Location: Seattle
Posts: 1,686
Quote:
Originally Posted by Ryephile View Post
You know what, I was mistaken with the direction, sorry about that. With the steering rack on the front side of the axle, pulling the struts inboard (more negative camber) would cause toe-out, so you're in luck. Going to street alignment would increase toe-in.

Where the tie-rods are makes all the difference!
No problem. It's good to hear so it's basically best of both worlds I get more toe out and camber when I need it the most and switch back to street setting when I get home or maybe after the track season is over as I don't drive the car daily that much
glamcem is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 07-31-2017, 02:01 PM   #33
Eric SS
#becauseracecar
 
Eric SS's Avatar
 
Drives: 2016 SS Sedan, 2016 Camaro SS
Join Date: May 2015
Location: Phoenix
Posts: 2,959
Quote:
Originally Posted by Ryephile View Post
You know what, I was mistaken with the direction, sorry about that. With the steering rack on the front side of the axle, pulling the struts inboard (more negative camber) would cause toe-out, so you're in luck. Going to street alignment would increase toe-in.

Where the tie-rods are makes all the difference!

Quote:
Originally Posted by glamcem View Post
hmm, good info thanks!
I wonder how much of a toe we're talking about if it's only a small amount of toe (say for .05 degree), I would simply have it setup my track camber to -3.0 and have the toe set at 0 so that in street it wouldn't be too much and I wouldn't sacrifice the longevity.

It's too bad, it's not the opposite :/ Like having 0 toe for street and a bit toe out with the track setting. It would be just perfect
On post 9 on this thread I asked him if he checked toe for street and track alignment just to see how much it changed between the 2 but I don't see an answer yet.

Like mentioned the toe should go out more for track and come in a little for street. I'd like to set zero toe for track and see what that makes it when I bring the camber back down to a street level. Hopefully it doesn't affect it to dramatically. I'll check in the next few days at home with my toe plates. My new strut arrived today so hopefully I'll have the install done by the end of the day and hopefully I'll be able to at least ballpark the toe differences between the 2 settings.
Eric SS is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 08-01-2017, 10:53 AM   #34
tx6g1le
 
tx6g1le's Avatar
 
Drives: 2017 Camaro 1LE
Join Date: Sep 2016
Location: Dallas, TX
Posts: 380
Quote:
Originally Posted by Eric SS View Post
On post 9 on this thread I asked him if he checked toe for street and track alignment just to see how much it changed between the 2 but I don't see an answer yet.

Like mentioned the toe should go out more for track and come in a little for street. I'd like to set zero toe for track and see what that makes it when I bring the camber back down to a street level. Hopefully it doesn't affect it to dramatically. I'll check in the next few days at home with my toe plates. My new strut arrived today so hopefully I'll have the install done by the end of the day and hopefully I'll be able to at least ballpark the toe differences between the 2 settings.
Eric, I had the toe set to 0 in the front and minimally positive rear toe for my track event this weekend. It obviously was a check and balance game as we adjusted camber. My idea was to check one metric at a time and see what a "quick" adjustment does on the alignment rack when changed on the fly. I'll update you to see what the toe does once dialed back to the 2's.

SO! After a great track day with other local Camaro enthusiasts, I'm very impressed with the drivability on the Moreno Motorsports camber plates. The plates are simple enough to adjust with the car in the air and hand tools. I admittedly overdid the camber at 3.3 but I enjoyed the oversteer on track. I agree the sweet spot may be high 2's and I'm headed back to the alignment rack tomorrow to tone it down. I'll find out what the toe does once we begin to tone down the camber settings and update the group.

Overall, the turn in (as expected) was improved dramatically. I'm not a great driver but as many sessions as I've had this year at MSR this was my favorite.

Metrics:
Front tires - 295/30r20 Michelin Sport Cup 2s
Camber - 3.3
PSI - Cold 29; Hot 37
Ambient temp - 101 F
Tire Temps after 2nd session - LF 184<186<192; RF 186>181>179

Here is my video from the event:
__________________
2017 Hyper Blue 1LE
tx6g1le is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 08-02-2017, 03:15 PM   #35
tx6g1le
 
tx6g1le's Avatar
 
Drives: 2017 Camaro 1LE
Join Date: Sep 2016
Location: Dallas, TX
Posts: 380
Quote:
Originally Posted by Eric SS View Post
On post 9 on this thread I asked him if he checked toe for street and track alignment just to see how much it changed between the 2 but I don't see an answer yet.

Like mentioned the toe should go out more for track and come in a little for street. I'd like to set zero toe for track and see what that makes it when I bring the camber back down to a street level. Hopefully it doesn't affect it to dramatically. I'll check in the next few days at home with my toe plates. My new strut arrived today so hopefully I'll have the install done by the end of the day and hopefully I'll be able to at least ballpark the toe differences between the 2 settings.
Eric, took some notes on the alignment rack today I wanted to share.

Front camber was 3.3 with -1/32in. of toe at first. After ONLY changing the camber to 2.8 it caused the toe angle to go to 1/16in. After going back and forth with the crash bolts and the camber plates I decided I won't be changing camber on the fly due to the change in toe angle. I hope this helps.
__________________
2017 Hyper Blue 1LE
tx6g1le is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 08-02-2017, 03:44 PM   #36
Eric SS
#becauseracecar
 
Eric SS's Avatar
 
Drives: 2016 SS Sedan, 2016 Camaro SS
Join Date: May 2015
Location: Phoenix
Posts: 2,959
Quote:
Originally Posted by tx6g1le View Post
Eric, took some notes on the alignment rack today I wanted to share.

Front camber was 3.3 with -1/32in. of toe at first. After ONLY changing the camber to 2.8 it caused the toe angle to go to 1/16in. After going back and forth with the crash bolts and the camber plates I decided I won't be changing camber on the fly due to the change in toe angle. I hope this helps.
Thank you that does help. Ouch. Looks like we'll have a ton of toe in between street and track setting if we adjust the full 2 degrees at the camber plate. Not the fault of the camber plate, just the geometry of the car. I'm thinking of checking it out tonight as well when I get home with my toe plates. I currently have 1.5 degrees on the camber plates with zero toe. I'll back it off to zero and check again.

Last edited by Eric SS; 08-02-2017 at 04:01 PM.
Eric SS is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 08-02-2017, 03:52 PM   #37
Ryephile
Hot Dog
 
Ryephile's Avatar
 
Drives: '17 1SS 1LE
Join Date: Feb 2016
Location: Metro Detroit
Posts: 1,937
Quote:
Originally Posted by tx6g1le View Post
Eric, took some notes on the alignment rack today I wanted to share.

Front camber was 3.3 with -1/32in. of toe at first. After ONLY changing the camber to 2.8 it caused the toe angle to go to 1/16in. After going back and forth with the crash bolts and the camber plates I decided I won't be changing camber on the fly due to the change in toe angle. I hope this helps.
Thanks for that, and also thanks for the tire temp data. Now we know where the limit is with regards to front camber.

__________________
2017 "M1SS1LE" in Hyper Blue w/PDR
Ryephile is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 08-02-2017, 04:50 PM   #38
seanblurr

 
seanblurr's Avatar
 
Drives: ZL1 1LE
Join Date: Oct 2016
Location: California
Posts: 1,297
Quote:
Originally Posted by Ryephile View Post
Thanks for that, and also thanks for the tire temp data. Now we know where the limit is with regards to front camber.

What exactly do you mean limit? In my rather rudimentary understanding of time temp data, those temps would indicate that he has yet to reach a camber limit, right? The outside temps are still the hottest, meaning he still could use some more. I might even go as fare as to say that you may be a tad under inflated, like 0.5 psi.
__________________
seanblurr is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 08-02-2017, 05:51 PM   #39
Tomiboy
 
Drives: 2017 Hyper Blue 1LE
Join Date: Dec 2016
Location: Albuquerque, NM
Posts: 253
I thought the insides were the hottest? Maybe I'm not understanding his method of measuring temp?
Tomiboy is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 08-02-2017, 06:11 PM   #40
seanblurr

 
seanblurr's Avatar
 
Drives: ZL1 1LE
Join Date: Oct 2016
Location: California
Posts: 1,297
I understand it to mean which ever number is the greater than sign is more lateral. Inner<middle<outside, or outide>middle>inner.
__________________
seanblurr is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 08-02-2017, 07:43 PM   #41
Eric SS
#becauseracecar
 
Eric SS's Avatar
 
Drives: 2016 SS Sedan, 2016 Camaro SS
Join Date: May 2015
Location: Phoenix
Posts: 2,959
Ok I did a little playing around too. I don't know exactly what my camber was at the knuckle but I think it was about 1.5*. I then added an additional 1.5* on the camber plates and set my toe to dead nuts zero using my toe plates. I then put the camber plates back to zero so the only camber was at the knuckle. I then measured toe at 3/16" in. That's not too terrible I guess. I can possibly live with that. That said, it's really easy to change the toe on this car so I might just try and mark the tie rods so I know how much to move them after a track day.
Eric SS is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 08-02-2017, 10:36 PM   #42
Ryephile
Hot Dog
 
Ryephile's Avatar
 
Drives: '17 1SS 1LE
Join Date: Feb 2016
Location: Metro Detroit
Posts: 1,937
Quote:
Originally Posted by seanblurr View Post
What exactly do you mean limit? In my rather rudimentary understanding of time temp data, those temps would indicate that he has yet to reach a camber limit, right? The outside temps are still the hottest, meaning he still could use some more. I might even go as fare as to say that you may be a tad under inflated, like 0.5 psi.
I also read his measurements as: Outside/Middle/Inside, then Inside/Middle/Outside. This is corroborated by his comment that he overdid the camber and he feels that a high 2.x degree would be better. Perhaps he can clarify that.

Hot 37 PSI is, IMO, the limit with the Supercar 3's, but given he's running Michelin's that throws a variable in there.
__________________
2017 "M1SS1LE" in Hyper Blue w/PDR
Ryephile is offline   Reply With Quote
 
Post Reply


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump


All times are GMT -5. The time now is 08:18 AM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.9 Beta 4
Copyright ©2000 - 2024, vBulletin Solutions, Inc.