Homepage Garage Wiki Register Community Calendar Today's Posts Search
#Camaro6
Go Back   CAMARO6 > Technical Camaro Topics > Audio, Video, Bluetooth, Nav, Radar, Electronics


BeckyD @ James Martin Chevy


Post Reply
 
Thread Tools
Old 08-24-2016, 09:46 AM   #1
MarkZ
 
MarkZ's Avatar
 
Drives: 2016 Camaro RS 2LT
Join Date: Mar 2016
Location: Palm City, FL
Posts: 186
Rear speakers- really this bad?

Playing with my radio a bit this morning and I realized the rear speakers in my car are terrible. And yes, I have the Bose system.

Treble 100%, Mid-range 50%, bass about 75%.

If I change the fade all the way to the rear, it sounds completely horrible. Zero highs, zero lows, all mid-range (basically like a mono speaker). If I bump it up just one notch to the front, the subs in the doors turn on (and pretty much full power) but nothing else? Does everyone's do this?

Just trying to figure out if I have an issue and need to bring it in, or whether its just really that bad.

Thanks in advance for any info you can give me.
__________________
Mark
MarkZ is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 08-24-2016, 09:49 AM   #2
Glen e
Retired from Car mfrs....
 
Glen e's Avatar
 
Drives: 2LT RS/HR-V
Join Date: May 2013
Location: /Fort Lauderdale
Posts: 10,048
The rear speakers are certainly for Fill, Yeah they're not great. But try this.

Treble -one notch more than middle
mid range one notch more than middle
base one notch less middle.
Fade one notch to the front.

That was what a guy did to my system that is a Bose specialist. And it sounds pretty good. Bose system doesn't like extreme tone.
Glen e is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 08-24-2016, 09:52 AM   #3
Emoto
Sure, why not?
 
Emoto's Avatar
 
Drives: 2016 Camaro 2SS, Jeep JKU Rubicon
Join Date: Mar 2015
Location: SE Mass
Posts: 1,538
Quote:
Originally Posted by Glen e View Post
The rear speakers are certainly for Fill, Yeah they're not great. But try this.

Treble -one notch more than middle
mid range one notch more than middle
base one notch less middle.
Fade one notch to the front.

That was what a guy did to my system that is a Bose specialist. And it sounds pretty good. Bose system doesn't like extreme tone.
I will also try this. I find that the Bose system lacks clarity in the lower frequencies.
__________________
This is that witty and clever statement that makes you chuckle.
Emoto is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 08-24-2016, 10:01 AM   #4
ajp
50th Anniversary Vert
 
ajp's Avatar
 
Drives: Camaro 2017 50th Anniversary
Join Date: Jul 2009
Location: AZ
Posts: 2,315
My speakers vibrate like crazy, will try the settings above.
__________________
ajp is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 12-03-2016, 01:26 AM   #5
Tankman
 
Tankman's Avatar
 
Drives: 2017 Camaro 1LT 2.0 Turbo
Join Date: Nov 2016
Location: Southern Alberta, Canada
Posts: 168
Hi there,
Any success with the above suggested settings? Or any more ideas to get the BEST out of BOSE??
Tankman is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 12-03-2016, 07:31 AM   #6
laynlo15
 
laynlo15's Avatar
 
Drives: 2022 Lt1 A10
Join Date: Nov 2015
Location: clark, mo
Posts: 8,860
I bought a 1ss with no rear speakers. That really sucked but we installed Memphis 6x9 and 300 watt Memphis amp just to drive those and its the cats meow. I didn't want the bose that would have been in the 2ss. The quality is just not there from the factory systems.
__________________
2022 Lt1 6.2 A10, Maggie 2300, THPSI Port Inj/10 rib, Rotofab, E, Nickey, SCOL, Griptech, RC Bandits, Hoosiers/MT 9.80@142.96 1.44 60ft, 6.34@112 707/669 RWHP/TRQ. 16SS Maggie 2650 9.41@147 1.35 60ft, 5.99@119. 16 C7 A8 10.90@128 Bolt on stuff
laynlo15 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 12-03-2016, 05:31 PM   #7
Evil-Bee-NH
603 Camaros
 
Evil-Bee-NH's Avatar
 
Drives: 2017 NGM I4 1LT Coupe
Join Date: May 2012
Location: Manchester, NH
Posts: 6,779
I got the 1LT no rear speakers put a 10" RF Punch Sub in the trunk I think it sounds 10x better without the rear speakers.
__________________

MY 2017 I4 CAMARO BUILD JOURNAL | YOUTUBE | INSTAGRAM | 316RWHP - 385 RWTQ HPTUNERS DYNO TUNE | 12.693s @ 105MPH 1/4 Mile
Evil-Bee-NH is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 12-03-2016, 10:03 PM   #8
JoeAyalaM
Account Suspended
 
Drives: Audi S6 V8TT, Volvos XC60 & S60R
Join Date: Feb 2016
Location: 5000 ft above sea level.
Posts: 414
Bose is good only at low mid volume levels. If you ever get mooved by music, you will need to upgrade.
JoeAyalaM is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 12-04-2016, 01:15 AM   #9
Tankman
 
Tankman's Avatar
 
Drives: 2017 Camaro 1LT 2.0 Turbo
Join Date: Nov 2016
Location: Southern Alberta, Canada
Posts: 168
Reading lots about the Bose system in our Camaro's and the general disappointment across the board. I wonder how much quality control did the Chevrolet "sound" engineers do? It would appear very little.
Or are we missing something with this set up?
Tankman is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 12-04-2016, 06:48 AM   #10
2006Moy
 
Drives: 2016 SS Convertible Hyper Blue
Join Date: Apr 2016
Location: Neosho, mo
Posts: 254
Its just factory radio in cars imo. They all just toss crap in last minute and don't put R@D into it. Unless you start going Harmon Kardin and up on quality none of the big 4 have good systems imo.
__________________
Blacked bow ties, full bigwormgraphix blackout
Gm splash guards
Mishimoto catch can
Black hash marks
Curb alert
Vitesse controller

Jl audio HD 900/5 amp
c5 650 components
c2 650x coaxials rear fill
2 x 8" W3v3 subwoofers custom ported box
Fix 82 module

BF TPNS
BF Wet Diamond
BF Crystal Seal
Hydr02
303 Aerospace top protectant
2006Moy is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 12-04-2016, 07:36 AM   #11
AndyUK
 
Drives: 2017 Camaro SS
Join Date: Aug 2016
Location: UK
Posts: 334
Quote:
Originally Posted by 2006Moy View Post
Its just factory radio in cars imo. They all just toss crap in last minute and don't put R@D into it. Unless you start going Harmon Kardin and up on quality none of the big 4 have good systems imo.
all factory systems seem to use really cheap drivers and cones in their speakers, you can somewhat mitigate this by installing a subwoofer and frequency cutoffs for all the 6x9's so that they don't see anything below 200hz

the problem with that being in the Camaro you have the active noise cancellation - a few people seem to be saying you can cut the mic cables but I've not actually seen someone say they have done exactly that

removing the X3 connector cuts the active noise cancellation, but it also cuts stuff like the cross traffic warning etc.
AndyUK is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 12-04-2016, 07:41 AM   #12
Sub

 
Sub's Avatar
 
Drives: 2017 ZL1
Join Date: Oct 2016
Location: Ny
Posts: 859
Has anyone done an afermarket build thread?
Sub is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 12-04-2016, 10:24 AM   #13
bybcous


 
bybcous's Avatar
 
Drives: 2016 Hyper Blue 1SS
Join Date: Jul 2015
Location: hampton roads
Posts: 2,763
Quote:
Originally Posted by AndyUK View Post
all factory systems seem to use really cheap drivers and cones in their speakers, you can somewhat mitigate this by installing a subwoofer and frequency cutoffs for all the 6x9's so that they don't see anything below 200hz

the problem with that being in the Camaro you have the active noise cancellation - a few people seem to be saying you can cut the mic cables but I've not actually seen someone say they have done exactly that

removing the X3 connector cuts the active noise cancellation, but it also cuts stuff like the cross traffic warning etc.
The mics in my door are cut, the only problem I have is people have a harder time hearing me through speakers, especially if windows are down.
__________________
1ss/Auto-Hyper Blue
acs carbon flash spoiler, bmr springs, gm clear tails.
Texas speed cam, 223/227 .635/.635 116 LSA, Kooks Long Tube Headers with green cats, MSD Atomic Air Force Intake, CAI Cold Air Intake, QTP cutouts. 503 hp
Best so far 11.5 at 123 with a 1.83 60ft. BMR lower and upper trailing arms and upper control arms,E85
DELIVERED 12/29/15
http://youtube.com/bybcous " no talking only racing on my youtube"
bybcous is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 12-04-2016, 01:30 PM   #14
ctrlz


 
Drives: 2017 2SS, 50th pkg, M6, MRC, NPP
Join Date: Jan 2016
Location: Ocean City, NJ
Posts: 3,181
Quote:
Originally Posted by Tankman View Post
Reading lots about the Bose system in our Camaro's and the general disappointment across the board. I wonder how much quality control did the Chevrolet "sound" engineers do? It would appear very little.
Or are we missing something with this set up?
Took delivery of my 2ss with Bose yesterday. Over bluetooth songs sounded pretty good. Really I was expecting disaster based on what I read here, but I realize audio can be very subjective. I will post a review once I have lived with the stock system for a while.
True that sub bass comes from the doors and the rear 6x9's are for rear-fill only. I think the rear side speaker are probably the mids and highs for rear fill, and the rear 6x9 maybe extend down to mid bass. Most of the amp power is routed to the front 5 speakers. This front soundstage approach is a big turnoff for many, particularity if you like booming 12" subs coming from the rear to fill the cabin. The other aspect of this philosophy that I like is the inclusion of a front center driver. Usually this is like front center fill. The amp combines left and right audio and routes a subset of mids and highs to the center speaker at reduced volume compared to the left and right drivers. I think this enhances the soundstage. But many like that more defined separation of hearing left and right channels coming from the corners.
My knee-jerk evaluation tells me I will not be considering upgrading this system unless a MOST adapter becomes available. Not worth it (to me) to spend hundreds on a DSP just to get a signal worth amping and sending out to new speakers. This is coming from someone who never buys Bose home equipment and has installed aftermarket audio on his last 6 cars (that would be all the cars I have owned).
Also, since I have the V8 with NPP, it is not exactly Symphony Hall type conditions in the cabin. So I would be more reluctant to go super high-end with an upgrade.
I have some audio test files I can play through this system. I should be able to estimate an overall frequency response. I think the results may prove surprising, as I suspect the bass extends down to at least 40 Hz. Based on what I've read here, I was not expecting that.
My initial rating for a car audio stock system: 8/10.
To answer your question about sound engineering, I do have some idea how this is done. It is basically outsourced. Once the cabin design is finalized the builder will let Bose tailor a system within a certain price range. There will be final tuning and EQ once prototypes are available for real world testing. The parties involved take pride in their work, but there is a budget and the realization that a sports car sets a lower priority to quieting the cabin compared to a Mercedes S-class.
ctrlz is offline   Reply With Quote
 
Post Reply


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump


All times are GMT -5. The time now is 06:03 PM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.9 Beta 4
Copyright ©2000 - 2024, vBulletin Solutions, Inc.