Homepage Garage Wiki Register Community Calendar Today's Posts Search
#Camaro6
Go Back   CAMARO6 > CAMARO6.com General Forums > 2016+ Camaro: 6th Gen Camaro general forum


BeckyD @ James Martin Chevy


Post Reply
 
Thread Tools
Old 03-07-2022, 10:29 AM   #29
SS_Don

 
SS_Don's Avatar
 
Drives: '22 Camaro 2SS
Join Date: Dec 2021
Location: Long Island, NY
Posts: 1,439
So if more people switch to E85 it means that there will be less demand for gasoline which should lower the price. As the demand for E85 increases so will the price. At some point the two prices will meet and everything will balance out and their will be harmony in the universe. ;-)

Just sayin’


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
__________________
'22 2SS | Wild Cherry Tintcoat | Design Package 3 | NPP | MRC | A10 | NAV | Ceramic Coating | Full Frontal PPF | New Hood and Side Stripes | Michelin PS AS 4 | Range AFM Disabler
Mishimoto Catch Can | Diode Dynamics side markers | Cold Air Inductions CAI | LLoyd Velourtex front/trunk mats with Camaro SS logo | Footwell Lighting | Umbra Sequential LED Taillights
ZL1addons Deluxe Rock Guards, Stealth Lift Pads, and Tow Hook | Escort MAXcam360c | Banks Data Pro and Pro gauges in ZZPerformance pillar pod | Paddle shifter extensions

SS_Don is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 03-07-2022, 10:59 AM   #30
laynlo15
 
Drives: 2022 Lt1 A10
Join Date: Nov 2015
Location: clark, mo
Posts: 8,882
When I first converted my C7 in early 2020 it was still pretty cheap but corn went up later in 2020 and the prices rose. Corn prices have been up since then so E85 has taken the hit also. It is still a great value for our cars in my opinion. Give me some corn.
laynlo15 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 03-07-2022, 12:30 PM   #31
arpad_m


 
arpad_m's Avatar
 
Drives: 2018 Camaro 2SS A8
Join Date: Jul 2017
Location: East Tennessee
Posts: 13,150
Quote:
Originally Posted by SS_Don View Post
So if more people switch to E85 it means that there will be less demand for gasoline which should lower the price. As the demand for E85 increases so will the price. At some point the two prices will meet and everything will balance out and their will be harmony in the universe. ;-)

Just sayin’
The number of cars/trucks that use E85 is negligible, the only statistic I could find put them at 5%, so there is probably little cross-elasticity between E85 and gas prices.
__________________
2018 Camaro 2SS — G7E MX0 NPP F55 IO6
735 rwhp | 665 rwtq

Magnuson TVS 2300 80mm pulley | Kooks 1 7/8" LT headers | JRE smooth idle terminator cam | LT4 FS & injectors | TSP forged pistons & rods
JMS PowerMAX | DSX flex fuel kit | Roto-Fab CAI | Soler 95mm LT5 TB | 1LE wheels | 1LE brakes | BMR rear cradle lockout | JRE custom tune

1100 - 1/30/18 | 2000 - 1/31/18
3000 - 2/06/18 TPW 2/26/18
3400 - 2/19/18 | 3800 - 2/26/18
4300 - 2/27/18 | 4B00 - 3/01/18
4200 - 3/05/18 | 4800 - 3/14/18
5000 - 3/16/18 | 6000 - 3/19/18
arpad_m is online now   Reply With Quote
Old 03-07-2022, 12:43 PM   #32
Zr8000
 
Drives: Chevy Camaro
Join Date: Apr 2020
Location: Wi
Posts: 384
Quote:
Originally Posted by KingLT1 View Post
Either way you want to slice it is fine by me...but the point was E doesn't cost a lot more to run vs 93.
It will take 50,000 miles to brake even using your numbers. Unless you are doing it for more power or keeping the car a long time it’s not really worth the cost/effort to convert one over.
Zr8000 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 03-07-2022, 12:49 PM   #33
Zr8000
 
Drives: Chevy Camaro
Join Date: Apr 2020
Location: Wi
Posts: 384
Quote:
Originally Posted by SS_Don View Post
So if more people switch to E85 it means that there will be less demand for gasoline which should lower the price. As the demand for E85 increases so will the price. At some point the two prices will meet and everything will balance out and their will be harmony in the universe. ;-)

Just sayin’


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
Farm input prices have gone up 150% this year compared to 2021. E85 prices will follow. At the end of the day there isn’t going to be much savings vs gas. The same thing happened in 08. Unless you are using it for performance adders it’s not really worth the time.
Zr8000 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 03-07-2022, 01:15 PM   #34
laynlo15
 
Drives: 2022 Lt1 A10
Join Date: Nov 2015
Location: clark, mo
Posts: 8,882
Quote:
Originally Posted by Zr8000 View Post
Farm input prices have gone up 150% this year compared to 2021. E85 prices will follow. At the end of the day there isn’t going to be much savings vs gas. The same thing happened in 08. Unless you are using it for performance adders it’s not really worth the time.
I agree with that but if you want the extra power its worth it and works well with additional mods.
laynlo15 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 03-07-2022, 02:21 PM   #35
s346k


 
s346k's Avatar
 
Drives: like an old lady
Join Date: Jun 2012
Location: indiana
Posts: 2,485
it is my experience and practice both, that no one runs ethanol for any form of financial gain. i think arguing either way on this topic is pretty silly. i use ethanol because the car simply runs better on it. the only disadvantage to ethanol is the simple fact that more of it is required to maintain an ideal afr. the car makes more hp & tq both, and is noticeably snappier on ethanol. my car made ~20 hp/30 tq more vs 93. nothing earth shattering but i can tell a difference in driving the car as to what fuel it's on. not to mention catless 93 octane stinks.

i didn't buy a v8 camaro for any reason other than to floor it and have fun. ethanol is a superior fuel by every performance standard. this car is a priority and it will take a lot more than $8-10-12 per gallon fuel to make me ever think twice about not driving it or even using the fuel i want. it's obviously not my dd, to which ill argue endlessly that the camaro sucks at anyway. another topic altogether.
__________________
2016+ camaro: everyone’s first car
s346k is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 03-07-2022, 02:42 PM   #36
3.8TransAM
 
Drives: SS 1LE, 89 TTA, 91 GTA, 91 Formula
Join Date: Jul 2019
Location: NW IN
Posts: 600
20% is about where you're looking for on the spread. If it's not there it's not worth it. Now u could build a straight E85 engine to negate most of that, but not all.
3.8TransAM is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 03-07-2022, 04:23 PM   #37
laynlo15
 
Drives: 2022 Lt1 A10
Join Date: Nov 2015
Location: clark, mo
Posts: 8,882
Quote:
Originally Posted by s346k View Post
it is my experience and practice both, that no one runs ethanol for any form of financial gain. i think arguing either way on this topic is pretty silly. i use ethanol because the car simply runs better on it. the only disadvantage to ethanol is the simple fact that more of it is required to maintain an ideal afr. the car makes more hp & tq both, and is noticeably snappier on ethanol. my car made ~20 hp/30 tq more vs 93. nothing earth shattering but i can tell a difference in driving the car as to what fuel it's on. not to mention catless 93 octane stinks.

i didn't buy a v8 camaro for any reason other than to floor it and have fun. ethanol is a superior fuel by every performance standard. this car is a priority and it will take a lot more than $8-10-12 per gallon fuel to make me ever think twice about not driving it or even using the fuel i want. it's obviously not my dd, to which ill argue endlessly that the camaro sucks at anyway. another topic altogether.

Absolutely
laynlo15 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 03-08-2022, 09:27 AM   #38
KingLT1


 
KingLT1's Avatar
 
Drives: 2016 1SS NFG A8
Join Date: Aug 2017
Location: 46804
Posts: 7,561
Just to clarify I wasn't advocating that anybody should run E to save money. I provided a generic cost of operation to show the OP that it doesn't cost really any more or less money to run vs pump 93. There has been a stigma ongoing with this topic for years now where it's "assumed" e85 costs a lot more to run because of the fuel mileage loss which isn't true and all I was trying to point out.

Either way I didn't buy a Camaro and put a Supercharger on it because I was worried about fuel mileage. I run E because it's essentially the cheapest high octane fuel solution that is readily available. E85 is 110 octane and cost is currently @ 4.00 a gallon...It burns clean, smells good, and these engines love it NA or FI. In comparison VP 110 race fuel is 15.00 a gallon.

So yea I agree it doesn't really make much sense to put a flex sensor on your leased daily driver. However the OP plans on installing a supercharger and headers. So imo it definitely makes sense to install a flex sensor and run some E or a blend of.
__________________

2016 NFG SS A8/Whipple 2.9/Fuel System/Flex Fuel
KingLT1 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 03-08-2022, 09:35 AM   #39
laynlo15
 
Drives: 2022 Lt1 A10
Join Date: Nov 2015
Location: clark, mo
Posts: 8,882
Quote:
Originally Posted by KingLT1 View Post
Just to clarify I wasn't advocating that anybody should run E to save money. I provided a generic cost of operation to show the OP that it doesn't cost really any more or less money to run vs pump 93. There has been a stigma ongoing with this topic for years now where it's "assumed" e85 costs a lot more to run because of the fuel mileage loss which isn't true and all I was trying to point out.

Either way I didn't buy a Camaro and put a Supercharger on it because I was worried about fuel mileage. I run E because it's essentially the cheapest high octane fuel solution that is readily available. E85 is 110 octane and cost is currently @ 4.00 a gallon...It burns clean, smells good, and these engines love it NA or FI. In comparison VP 110 race fuel is 15.00 a gallon.

So yea I agree it doesn't really make much sense to put a flex sensor on your leased daily driver. However the OP plans on installing a supercharger and headers. So imo it definitely makes sense to install a flex sensor and run some E or a blend of.
Totally agree and I would have loved to run E85 in my 16 SS Camaro when it was making big power, however the cost at the time to upgrade the fuel system was not what I wanted to do. I was spending 1100.00 each year on race fuel (MS109) and not driving my car on the street. I was one of those who said you don't need Port Injection if you wanted to run race fuel like I did but it limited my street driving of having to go back and forth between 93 and race fuel since I was racing a 2 to 3 times a month which basically left my Camaro sitting on the 4 post lift between races. Wish Mike would have had his PI out at that time because I could have put that system in my budget. That's why after 4 years my Camaro only had 13,000 miles on it but had over 280 passes down the track and probably 100 pulls on the dyno. What a loss on my part.
laynlo15 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 03-10-2022, 09:58 AM   #40
dmcmahan60

 
dmcmahan60's Avatar
 
Drives: 2017 SS
Join Date: Jan 2018
Location: Arab, AL
Posts: 902
Said what the hell and ordered a kit from Wildhammer Motorsports for $235 shipped. I plan on modifying my car in a few years anyway, so what could it hurt. have a good day
dmcmahan60 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 03-10-2022, 10:32 AM   #41
FlukeSS

 
FlukeSS's Avatar
 
Drives: 2020 Camaro 2SS A10
Join Date: Jun 2018
Location: Here
Posts: 1,809
Quote:
Originally Posted by dmcmahan60 View Post
Said what the hell and ordered a kit from Wildhammer Motorsports for $235 shipped. I plan on modifying my car in a few years anyway, so what could it hurt. have a good day
__________________
2020 Camaro 2SS A10 | Rebuilt by: CBI Street Cars | 2" SE LT Headers | 3" SE X-Pipe | 3" MBRP Axle-Back | Pri & Sec Cat Deletes | Roto-Fab CAI | LT2 Ported | 95mm ZR1 TB | LSA crankshaft conversion w/modified crank gear | LS1 thrust bearing | Gen V Hinson Plug Wire Set | BTR 220 Stage I Cam | ARP Rod Bolts | Delphi Lifter set | NGK LTR6IX-11 spark plug set | DOD Delete | VVT Limiter | ECM, TCM & E85 | Retuned by: Justin L. | Dyno: 510 rwhp 472 rwtq | Best 1/4 Time: 11.639
FlukeSS is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 03-10-2022, 10:42 AM   #42
laynlo15
 
Drives: 2022 Lt1 A10
Join Date: Nov 2015
Location: clark, mo
Posts: 8,882
Name:  20220309_172909.jpg
Views: 713
Size:  79.9 KBWe just got off the dyno with mine yesterday. I didn't do a base line but we made 431/442 on E57. I'm sure it would have made 395 to 410 base but really doesn't matter to me.
Name:  20220309_172935.jpg
Views: 716
Size:  107.8 KB

Last edited by laynlo15; 03-10-2022 at 10:55 AM.
laynlo15 is offline   Reply With Quote
 
Post Reply


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump


All times are GMT -5. The time now is 04:27 PM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.9 Beta 4
Copyright ©2000 - 2026, vBulletin Solutions, Inc.