[sub_ETCS_ret]

Originally Posted by bybcous

Sub_ETCS_ret you have been doing some serious researching before you make a purchase. My ultimate goal was 550, still hoping I can get there with e85, exhaust mods down the line, etc..

Watching you guys do your thing makes me think too much. I like what EVERYONE is doing.

I love cars and I love power. These forums are just a wealth of knowledge. Even better, if you ask a question correctly all the smart mofos provide the greatest information.

Sent from my SM-G920V using Tapatalk

[DFW1LE]

But then there is a question of whether the NA engine will be as street-able/reliable vs a SC engine when you start to wring out rwhp above 500 HP, unless going the stroker motor route.

[wnta1ss]

The January issue of Super Chevy magazine has an article on an LT1 build into a 416 cubic inch stroker meant for road course use. They say that power went from 435rwhp stock to 539rwhp built, retaining the stock intake manifold and throttle body. Then they added an MSD intake manifold and a Katech 103mm throttle body and peak power climbed again, to 577rwhp. We all know that dyno numbers by themselves don't mean much, so in conclusion the initial build gained 104hp and the intake manifold/throttle body swap added another 38hp on top of that.

[sub_ETCS_ret]

Originally Posted by wnta1ss

The January issue of Super Chevy magazine has an article on an LT1 build into a 416 cubic inch stroker meant for road course use. They say that power went from 435rwhp stock to 539rwhp built, retaining the stock intake manifold and throttle body. Then they added an MSD intake manifold and a Katech 103mm throttle body and peak power climbed again, to 577rwhp.

I need to give that a read. What was the title of the article?

Sent from my SM-G920V using Tapatalk

[bybcous]

Originally Posted by wnta1ss

The January issue of Super Chevy magazine has an article on an LT1 build into a 416 cubic inch stroker meant for road course use. They say that power went from 435rwhp stock to 539rwhp built, retaining the stock intake manifold and throttle body. Then they added an MSD intake manifold and a Katech 103mm throttle body and peak power climbed again, to 577rwhp. We all know that dyno numbers by themselves don't mean much, so in conclusion the initial build gained 104hp and the intake manifold/throttle body swap added another 38hp on top of that.

I have always wondered about the katech TB

[wnta1ss]

Originally Posted by sub_ETCS_ret

I need to give that a read. What was the title of the article?

Sent from my SM-G920V using Tapatalk

Title is "AU NATURAL", starts on page 72.

[sub_ETCS_ret]

Originally Posted by wnta1ss

Title is "AU NATURAL", starts on page 72.

Thanks!

Sent from my SM-G920V using Tapatalk

[oldman]

Originally Posted by sub_ETCS_ret

Thanks!

Sent from my SM-G920V using Tapatalk

holly mother of insert local deity 40 HP from an intake TB swap....

[sub_ETCS_ret]

Originally Posted by oldman

holly mother of insert local deity 40 HP from an intake TB swap....

Hahahaha. I take it that forum was kicking your ass.

Sent from my SM-G920V using Tapatalk

[oldman]

lets just say at FBO ONE is better off with ported tb and intake. LOL

[DFW1LE]

Here is a link to the article:http://www.superchevy.com/how-to/eng...-gen-6-camaro/

However, not sure I would want such an aggressive cam.

[Blk16SS]

Originally Posted by DFW1LE

Here is a link to the article:http://www.superchevy.com/how-to/eng...-gen-6-camaro/

However, not sure I would want such an aggressive cam.

It would have crossed the 600rwhp mark had they ported the heads.. This is when you really wanna port the heads, to compliment the added cubes..

[oldman]

I agree here, the stock head flat lines at .525, or even stalls in flow, I think port work at 577 HP is needed. Heck the Edeblrock Victor head would probably be the ticket.

[BradfordCamaro]

I would be happy with 540HP . Price....or should I ask....