|
|
#239 |
![]() Drives: 2017 Camaro 2.0T A8 Join Date: Jul 2018
Location: Arkansas
Posts: 20
|
Hopefully this picture works this time
__________________
Only a slightly modded I4-A8
Check out 1018 Video on YouTube! |
|
|
|
|
|
#240 |
![]() Drives: 2017 2SS M6 Vert Summit White Join Date: Jul 2018
Location: Redwood City, CA
Posts: 113
|
Bone stock A8. Have an Injen Evo7300 CAI in the box in my garage. After install plan on getting a tune and see what improvement I can get. Had rpm at 2500 at launch. Some wheel spin. Temp was 59F. All Season F1 Eagles. 32 psi. Pretty pleased with the time. Haven’t even made a payment yet. First try - didn’t have the timer set. Second try - a lot of wheel spin and a time of 6.2. Third try -
__________________
2017 2SS M6 Vert Summit White; aFe CAI, E85, dyno tuned; Bigworm Graphix, various exterior mods
|
|
|
|
|
|
#242 |
|
Coopers Camaro
Drives: 18 Flex Fuel LTG Join Date: Nov 2016
Location: St. Louis/Sullivan/Washington MO
Posts: 934
|
Meant to throw this here. 86.5% ethanol. Flex tuned. Bone stock otherwise. Was about 72', dropped rear psi on the 20's down to 22lbs.
__________________
|
|
|
|
|
|
#243 |
|
Drives: 2016 1LT RS Camaro; 72 Chevelle Join Date: Apr 2008
Location: Central Point, OR
Posts: 5,685
|
Nice! Nice to see that P3 gauge is accurate on a car that's timer doesn't start counting as soon as your breathe on the gas pedal before you even start to move like mine.
|
|
|
|
|
|
#244 |
![]() Drives: 2014 Cadillac ATS 2.0T Join Date: Jun 2018
Location: Indiana
Posts: 51
|
Question for you guys on this timer as the ATS obviously doesn't have it. I see allot of mid to high 4sec 0-60's. But when I look at the time slips I see allot of 2.0-2.2 60' times. Sorry but this isn't adding up here, if the car can get mid4's on the street then why is the 60' so bad at the track? I hook the same at the track or street thanks to AWD. I pull 1.7x 60's and the best 0-60 on my hptuners i've had is 4.7. My 1/8th was 8.3 and 1/4 was 13.03. Not trying to start a war, just questioning the validity of these factory timers.
|
|
|
|
|
|
#245 | |
|
603 Camaros
Drives: 2017 NGM I4 1LT Coupe Join Date: May 2012
Location: Manchester, NH
Posts: 6,779
|
Quote:
__________________
MY 2017 I4 CAMARO BUILD JOURNAL | YOUTUBE | INSTAGRAM | 316RWHP - 385 RWTQ HPTUNERS DYNO TUNE | 12.693s @ 105MPH 1/4 Mile Last edited by Evil-Bee-NH; 09-05-2018 at 09:10 AM. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
#246 | |
|
Coopers Camaro
Drives: 18 Flex Fuel LTG Join Date: Nov 2016
Location: St. Louis/Sullivan/Washington MO
Posts: 934
|
Quote:
Actually a 2.0 60' falls right in line with mid 4's. 2.0 second 60' time = 40.9 mph @60' = 5.2 second 0-60 time 1.9 second 60' time = 43.0 mph @60' = 4.6 second 0-60 time 1.8 second 60' time = 45.5 mph @60' = 4.0 second 0-60 time But, you can't assume constant acceleration over 60' or 0-60. Strictly math based, your 1.7 60' would yield a 3.5 or better 0-60. But it does not. At the track, distance is measured. These timers do not measure distance, only time and speed. With that said, I actually find the timer in my car to be very accurate.
__________________
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
#247 |
|
Drives: 2016 1LT RS Camaro; 72 Chevelle Join Date: Apr 2008
Location: Central Point, OR
Posts: 5,685
|
I ran a 1.77 60' one time... And ran a 3.8sec 0-60 one time... Coincidence. Probably. But I like your math!
|
|
|
|
|
|
#248 | |
![]() Drives: 2014 Cadillac ATS 2.0T Join Date: Jun 2018
Location: Indiana
Posts: 51
|
Quote:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
#249 | |
|
Coopers Camaro
Drives: 18 Flex Fuel LTG Join Date: Nov 2016
Location: St. Louis/Sullivan/Washington MO
Posts: 934
|
Quote:
"approximate" data. Its not an exact science, but those times and yours are totally possible.
__________________
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
#250 |
![]() Drives: 2017 Camaro 2.0T RS Join Date: Jul 2018
Location: Grand Rapids, MI
Posts: 95
|
2017, A8 RS, Mods: Intake, downpipe, exhaust, intercooler, tune, S3 cams, BC coilovers, and stock tires. Once we get the TCM tuned and some good tires I'm guessing low 4s.
|
|
|
|
|
|
#251 |
|
Pat
Drives: 2017 Camaro 1LT I4 Turbo A8 Join Date: Nov 2016
Location: Stratford, CT
Posts: 827
|
Damn... I've consistently been running 4.8-5.0 and all I have is an intake, down pipe and charge pipe with cheap performance tires. I would say let's attribute this to the tires but they are still slidey ass all hell on the track.
__________________
Follow me on Instagram @whiskeyfed
Subscribe on YouTube Whiskeyfed Camaro Follow my Build Thread The WhiskeyFed Camaro Current Modifications: JacFab Boost-O-Lator, Injen Evolution CAI, ZZP Catless Downpipe, RPM 3" Charge Pipe, Mishimoto Oil Filtration/Coolant Systems, R1 Concepts Brakes Package, Eibach Pro-Kit Lowering Springs, PTP Lava Exhaust Wrap & Turbo Blanket DYNO SHEET: 297whp / 374wtq Tuned by #danytechtuning |
|
|
|
|
|
#252 | |
|
Coopers Camaro
Drives: 18 Flex Fuel LTG Join Date: Nov 2016
Location: St. Louis/Sullivan/Washington MO
Posts: 934
|
Quote:
Sorry, I initially missed your post. I'm all about the numbers (trade curse) I have the same data in EFILive. I would not have posted my time if I felt it was in-accurate. Granted, my 4.6 was a hero run, as I have not hit that again.. Yet.. 8.5 - 3.9 = 4.6
__________________
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Post Reply
|
|
|