Homepage Garage Wiki Register Community Calendar Today's Posts Search
#Camaro6
Go Back   CAMARO6 > CAMARO6.com General Forums > 6th gen Camaro vs...


Bigwormgraphix


Thread Closed
 
Thread Tools
Old 12-04-2017, 07:06 PM   #743
kttxz06

 
kttxz06's Avatar
 
Drives: '18 Zl1. '18 GT350.
Join Date: Dec 2016
Location: Katy
Posts: 2,104
next they'll be saying a GT is an overall better car than the new ZR1.
__________________
There's only 2 people I trust. 1 of them is me, the other's not you. 2018 Zl1. 1199 RWHP/931 TQ.
kttxz06 is offline  
Old 12-04-2017, 07:09 PM   #744
ULTRAZLS1


 
ULTRAZLS1's Avatar
 
Drives: 14 Silverado LTZ Z71, 16 Camaro SS
Join Date: Nov 2009
Location: Jackson, Michigan
Posts: 4,422
Quote:
Originally Posted by germanicus View Post
Maryland in December! With its mythical DA and perfect track conditions! MIR?

As much as I am proud of my state, im not sure thats where you want to hang your hat argumentatively.

The fact that there are 'Mustang shops' that 'went and did a rental' is telling of what exactly? That there is a more robust aftermarket and interest for that particular vehicle? It says to me they want to make money. Maybe if Camaro sales were better they too would have the market presence to support similar aftermarket businesses. Plenty room for improvement!

I didn't have any expectations. I am simply observing the results. They are pretty telling. Sample size tells a lot. Still doesn't explain the necessity to poop all over the results out of some misguided defense mechanism for god knows what reason? (lack of self confidence? Associated ego fragility?)

And which party would that be? The sales party?

Anyway, its a drivers race now stock.
Should be fun.
Sample size tells nothing. You could have 100 mustangs run in florida on a 100 degree day and get a terrible average.

Results from more sample size comes from experienced drivers getting to the track in good DA and prep.

All of which you had rolled into one with this track rental. All of which the SS that ran 11s stock when it first came out. SO again your argument that its ahead of the game form sample size is retarded.

Don't care about sales so ok enjoy that

lol talking to us about ego fragility and lack of confidence. You are the one on a Camaro forum trying to prop up the mustang.

And I didn't poop on any results. I called them what they were. Above average. You got to have something wrong with you to think a rental in negative DA wont be above average. This is like the twilight zone
ULTRAZLS1 is offline  
Old 12-04-2017, 07:14 PM   #745
hotlap


 
hotlap's Avatar
 
Drives: 20 1LE 2SS M6 Rally Green
Join Date: Mar 2014
Location: Franklin WI
Posts: 6,637
Quote:
Originally Posted by germanicus View Post
However you want to spin it, or stick your head in the sand, after THREE WEEKS of availability there are stock GT's running flat 12.0. 3 weeks. Against over 2 years of 2ss, and the BEST you have to show are 4 results which are faster. TWO YEARS. All of which are under .1 second difference.
Slot that tuner, track rental 12.02 run amongst the top 10 on this forums fast list. Rather middle of the pack. No?

Name:  image.jpeg
Views: 339
Size:  51.4 KB

Now you're expecting a parade?

Quote:
Originally Posted by germanicus View Post
spin spin spin spin
__________________

"the trouble with our liberal friends is not that they're ignorant; it's just that they know so much that isn't so.”
Ronald Reagan -
hotlap is offline  
Old 12-04-2017, 07:19 PM   #746
SSfriendly
Banned
 
Drives: Looking
Join Date: Jul 2017
Location: Upstate SC
Posts: 348
Quote:
Originally Posted by 1295/SS View Post
Tires and a tune won't touch a ZL1. You sound like a teenager.
Did you not see the run lund did on their E85 tune with wheels/tires (17" MT R drag radials)? The 11.31 @ 124mph puts it squarely at number 2 on the ZL1 fast list.
SSfriendly is offline  
Old 12-04-2017, 07:20 PM   #747
ULTRAZLS1


 
ULTRAZLS1's Avatar
 
Drives: 14 Silverado LTZ Z71, 16 Camaro SS
Join Date: Nov 2009
Location: Jackson, Michigan
Posts: 4,422
Quote:
Originally Posted by hotlap View Post
Slot that tuner, track rental 12.02 run amongst the top 10 on this forums fast list. Rather middle of the pack. No?

Attachment 909841

Now you're expecting a parade?
Conditions don't matter. Its the timeframe and sample size.
ULTRAZLS1 is offline  
Old 12-04-2017, 07:20 PM   #748
SSfriendly
Banned
 
Drives: Looking
Join Date: Jul 2017
Location: Upstate SC
Posts: 348
Quote:
Originally Posted by SuperSound View Post
Last I checked, it ran a 11.56@122 on tune and drag pack. That's slower than half of the ZL1 stock runs on the list. It ran faster with E85, but that's another mod too. Comparing a car on tires purposely designed for drag racing to a car on street tires designed for street/track duty is stupid to begin with. Because someone else out there is always going to have more.
And E85 tune isn't another mod...it's a tune.
SSfriendly is offline  
Old 12-04-2017, 07:22 PM   #749
FastCarFanBoy
Banned
 
Drives: 2013 GB GT
Join Date: Mar 2016
Location: Florida
Posts: 954
Quote:
Originally Posted by SuperSound View Post
Last I checked, it ran a 11.56@122 on tune and drag pack. That's slower than half of the ZL1 stock runs on the list. It ran faster with E85, but that's another mod too. Comparing a car on tires purposely designed for drag racing to a car on street tires designed for street/track duty is stupid to begin with. Because someone else out there is always going to have more.


think hes referring to the e85 tune , it went 11.31 @124.xx iirc... pretty solid pass for the mods.
FastCarFanBoy is offline  
Old 12-04-2017, 07:25 PM   #750
kttxz06

 
kttxz06's Avatar
 
Drives: '18 Zl1. '18 GT350.
Join Date: Dec 2016
Location: Katy
Posts: 2,104


well, since anything goes with the Ford Fanboys. Here ya go. Just a 9.2 with boltons and tune and tires. Nothing to see here. We can play this game all day long.
__________________
There's only 2 people I trust. 1 of them is me, the other's not you. 2018 Zl1. 1199 RWHP/931 TQ.
kttxz06 is offline  
Old 12-04-2017, 07:28 PM   #751
ULTRAZLS1


 
ULTRAZLS1's Avatar
 
Drives: 14 Silverado LTZ Z71, 16 Camaro SS
Join Date: Nov 2009
Location: Jackson, Michigan
Posts: 4,422
Quote:
Originally Posted by SSfriendly View Post
Did you not see the run lund did on their E85 tune with wheels/tires (17" MT R drag radials)? The 11.31 @ 124mph puts it squarely at number 2 on the ZL1 fast list.
A guy just went 10s at 128 stock it hasn't been updated (big shock everyone going the fastest right now...except for mustangs lol)

A ZL1 with a drag pack and e85 in negative DA would probably run mid 10s over 130
ULTRAZLS1 is offline  
Old 12-04-2017, 07:44 PM   #752
SSfriendly
Banned
 
Drives: Looking
Join Date: Jul 2017
Location: Upstate SC
Posts: 348
Quote:
Originally Posted by ULTRAZLS1 View Post
A guy just went 10s at 128 stock it hasn't been updated (big shock everyone going the fastest right now...except for mustangs lol)

A ZL1 with a drag pack and e85 in negative DA would probably run mid 10s over 130
A couple things. First off, while Lunds runs were in great air, they were sill about 1000DA off from what most would consider "hero" weather.

Second, That still doesn't change the fact that a tune and tire (drag radial) MY18 just ran third (the list has 2 and the times mixed) on the current ZL1 best list. If it makes you feel better, call it fourth. That's not withing spitting distance, that's quick enough to compete head to head. Hell, he made it look easy.

Don't get me wrong, I'm not claiming the GT has anywhere near the ZL1 power. But it's a hell of a lot closer than I personally thought it would achieve with just a tune and wheels/tires.
SSfriendly is offline  
Old 12-04-2017, 07:56 PM   #753
SuperSound


 
SuperSound's Avatar
 
Drives: '17 Camaro 2SS A8
Join Date: Jan 2015
Location: Eastern NC
Posts: 5,063
Quote:
Originally Posted by SSfriendly View Post
And E85 tune isn't another mod...it's a tune.
Oh so 100 octane gas and tune is considered the same as 91 octane gas and tune? What about 130 octane? Pretty sure everyone lists E85 as a mod itself since you actually need the gas to make it work. Even Lund lists it as "But wait, there’s more! 11.31 at 124 MPH!
Tune, Tire, e85."

Quote:
Originally Posted by FastCarFanBoy View Post
think hes referring to the e85 tune , it went 11.31 @124.xx iirc... pretty solid pass for the mods.
Kind of gain you would expect for E85 on DI. Definitely one of the best bangs for the buck.
__________________
Current: '17 2SS Hyper Blue, A8, MRC, NPP
Past: '99 SS Camaro A4, '73 Camaro 383 A3

"Voices in your head are not considered insider information."

3800 Status - 6/16/16 (Built!)
6000 status - 6/29/16 (Delivered!)
SuperSound is offline  
Old 12-04-2017, 08:02 PM   #754
ULTRAZLS1


 
ULTRAZLS1's Avatar
 
Drives: 14 Silverado LTZ Z71, 16 Camaro SS
Join Date: Nov 2009
Location: Jackson, Michigan
Posts: 4,422
Quote:
Originally Posted by SSfriendly View Post
A couple things. First off, while Lunds runs were in great air, they were sill about 1000DA off from what most would consider "hero" weather.

Second, That still doesn't change the fact that a tune and tire (drag radial) MY18 just ran third (the list has 2 and the times mixed) on the current ZL1 best list. If it makes you feel better, call it fourth. That's not withing spitting distance, that's quick enough to compete head to head. Hell, he made it look easy.

Don't get me wrong, I'm not claiming the GT has anywhere near the ZL1 power. But it's a hell of a lot closer than I personally thought it would achieve with just a tune and wheels/tires.
You get roughly a tenth from another 1000. Its very close to best case scenario. Which is what ive said all along.
I never said it was absolute best conditions. Most never see better than -500. So to me -500 is as good as it gets. Even worse than that for some. My tracks close when it gets cold enough for that. And im at 600-1000 elevation to start.

It wasn't tune and tire. It had drag pack. Lighter wheels and tires all around. Very small in the front. That's good for a tenth or two over just a tire on the stock 20s.

It hasn't done anything my car hasn't done or was capable of.

I went 11.6 with no tune. Then skipped to more mods. E85 gives 30-40 rwhp gain. Id have been right with it. But not as much trap speed id guess. But ive never ran at that track. E85 gives huge gains on these high comp DI motors. More than any other mod I did by far.

Other than that comparing modded cars on a tire to stock cars on stock tires is kinda pointless.
ULTRAZLS1 is offline  
Old 12-04-2017, 08:04 PM   #755
SSfriendly
Banned
 
Drives: Looking
Join Date: Jul 2017
Location: Upstate SC
Posts: 348
Quote:
Originally Posted by SuperSound View Post
Oh so 100 octane gas and tune is considered the same as 91 octane gas and tune? What about 130 octane? Pretty sure everyone lists E85 as a mod itself since you actually need the gas to make it work. Even Lund lists it as "But wait, there’s more! 11.31 at 124 MPH!
Tune, Tire, e85."



Kind of gain you would expect for E85 on DI. Definitely one of the best bangs for the buck.
Nope, I didn't say it was the same. But it's still just considered a tune (flex fuel) and wheels/tires. The fact that it's for E85 doesn't magically make it something additional on top of a normal tune.

No one at M6G lists E85 as an additional mod. Unlike the camaro, it doesn't require any additional hardware.

If you buy a 93 octane tune over a 91 octane tune...you wouldn't consider it an additional mod. E85 is the same thing (for the mustang).
SSfriendly is offline  
Old 12-04-2017, 08:10 PM   #756
SSfriendly
Banned
 
Drives: Looking
Join Date: Jul 2017
Location: Upstate SC
Posts: 348
Quote:
Originally Posted by ULTRAZLS1 View Post
You get roughly a tenth from another 1000. Its very close to best case scenario. Which is what ive said all along.
I never said it was absolute best conditions. Most never see better than -500. So to me -500 is as good as it gets. Even worse than that for some. My tracks close when it gets cold enough for that. And im at 600-1000 elevation to start.

It wasn't tune and tire. It had drag pack. Lighter wheels and tires all around. Very small in the front. That's good for a tenth or two over just a tire on the stock 20s.

It hasn't done anything my car hasn't done or was capable of.

I went 11.6 with no tune. Then skipped to more mods. E85 gives 30-40 rwhp gain. Id have been right with it. But not as much trap speed id guess. But ive never ran at that track. E85 gives huge gains on these high comp DI motors. More than any other mod I did by far.
I've ran at Stanton and Milan during late fall with - DA. Stanton typically had better weather...and a much lighter crowd.

I don't disagree, it's not the norm. But there will be faster hero times to come for the mustang...you can count on that.

Again, I'm not saying the MY18 is a world beater...but it looks like an E85 tune on a MY18 is no cake walk for a stock ZL1.
SSfriendly is offline  
 
Closed Thread


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump


All times are GMT -5. The time now is 05:40 AM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.9 Beta 4
Copyright ©2000 - 2026, vBulletin Solutions, Inc.