Homepage Garage Wiki Register Community Calendar Today's Posts Search
#Camaro6
Go Back   CAMARO6 > CAMARO6.com General Forums > 2016+ Camaro: 6th Gen Camaro general forum


Phastek Performance


Post Reply
 
Thread Tools
Old 08-28-2017, 03:18 PM   #197
my1stchevy
 
Drives: 2016 Camaro HBM 2SS NPP MRC
Join Date: Sep 2015
Location: Illinois
Posts: 142
Quote:
Originally Posted by IMadeYouReadThis View Post
Reaching now aren't you
based on what i have read on the forum it does seem like the i4 is more mod friendly compared to the v6.
my1stchevy is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 08-28-2017, 03:38 PM   #198
Lukemo
 
Lukemo's Avatar
 
Drives: '17 1LT RS V6 6M NPP
Join Date: Apr 2016
Location: Rochester, MI
Posts: 449
Quote:
Originally Posted by Risky Justice View Post
I've heard people say the V6 sounds better than the 4...not really sure that is true either. Some 6 cylinders do sound amazing, but the sound difference between the 4 and 6 cylinder Camaros isn't that spectacular--both sound pretty good.
You must be speculating... and haven't heard the V6 with NPP in person. It sounds incredible and is probably my favorite thing about the car.
Lukemo is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 08-28-2017, 04:04 PM   #199
Risky Justice
 
Risky Justice's Avatar
 
Drives: 2016 Camaro 2SS M6
Join Date: Jan 2017
Location: Panama City, FL
Posts: 217
Quote:
Originally Posted by Lukemo View Post
You must be speculating... and haven't heard the V6 with NPP in person. It sounds incredible and is probably my favorite thing about the car.
Does YouTube count? Sure, V8 > V6 > I4 as far as sound goes, but I wouldn't pick the V8 over the V6 just for sound, if the smaller engine was the better one for modding response.


Quote:
Originally Posted by redcoats1976 View Post
i own a v6 and im happy with it.the loaner 4 cylinder i drove seemed to be making good power though.im not seeing why turbocharging the 6 wouldnt make more power than the 4,although it would cost more to do so.just a matter of cost effectiveness as you would only need to switch wastegates/change the size of the turbo on the 4?
An adjustable wastgate (to up the boost and hold it better), a downpipe, and an upgraded cold side pipe would probably put the 4 cylinder at 350/375 on HP/TQ.
__________________
‘16 Camaro 2SS M6 - RotoFab CAI, Soler Performance TB, E85
8.102 @ 89.85 MPH (bone stock)
Risky Justice is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 08-28-2017, 04:12 PM   #200
Jason@JacFab
 
Drives: 2016 1LT RS Camaro; 72 Chevelle
Join Date: Apr 2008
Location: Central Point, OR
Posts: 5,685
Send a message via AIM to Jason@JacFab Send a message via MSN to Jason@JacFab
Quote:
Originally Posted by IMadeYouReadThis View Post
Reaching now aren't you
I don't think so. Let me rephrase...

OP If you don't want to modify the car at all, and can't afford a v8, buy the 6... If you do plan on modifying, a 4 will respond better, and put a bigger smile on your face per dollar spent.

Quote:
Originally Posted by my1stchevy View Post
based on what i have read on the forum it does seem like the i4 is more mod friendly compared to the v6.
It is for sure.

Quote:
Originally Posted by Lukemo View Post
You must be speculating... and haven't heard the V6 with NPP in person. It sounds incredible and is probably my favorite thing about the car.
I can say the v6 NPP does sound good. The 4 cylinder will never SOUND good. But sound doesn't = Fast/quick either...

That said... Show me a v6 that will do 0-60 in 4.0 or quicker.... My 4 banger does, and I've spent very little $ on mods. I bought the 4 because of the modding potential. I couldn't justify the cost of the v8, and knew the v6 wouldn't get me to where I wanted to be in the 1/4 mile times without spending a ton more money.
Jason@JacFab is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 08-28-2017, 04:36 PM   #201
Zzzato
Bigg Balls
 
Zzzato's Avatar
 
Drives: 2024 Red Hot 1SS
Join Date: Jul 2017
Location: SLC
Posts: 164
Should've turned this into a poll. These threads never end well.
__________________
2017 Red Hot 1SS 8A..... Sold for a minivan
2024 Red Hot 1SS 8A.... No mods ..... yet
Zzzato is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 08-28-2017, 04:54 PM   #202
LuvMI
Lovin the growl...
 
LuvMI's Avatar
 
Drives: 2018 2SS
Join Date: Mar 2017
Location: Rogers, Arkansas
Posts: 926
Never discount sound. It's the gateway to your emotions. As a kid I never pretended speeding down the hwy in a quiet ass car.
LuvMI is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 08-28-2017, 05:05 PM   #203
Marty McFlew
Banned
 
Drives: 17 SuperSport Camaro 6 on the Flo'
Join Date: Feb 2016
Location: USA
Posts: 1,507
Quote:
Originally Posted by Need4Camaro View Post
Actually they're both equal in power per cubic inch. remember the SS is only slightly over 100 HP more power and twice the displacement.
HP wise but not in Tq. Like I said the drawback for the V6 is the low Tq and sound. Otherwise its a great engine.
Marty McFlew is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 08-28-2017, 05:14 PM   #204
Marty McFlew
Banned
 
Drives: 17 SuperSport Camaro 6 on the Flo'
Join Date: Feb 2016
Location: USA
Posts: 1,507
Quote:
Originally Posted by LuvMI View Post
Never discount sound. It's the gateway to your emotions. As a kid I never pretended speeding down the hwy in a quiet ass car.
Yes...how many of us can deny blowing spit through our lips making car sounds with our lips as kids??And how many of you can deny still doing it today?
Marty McFlew is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 08-28-2017, 05:48 PM   #205
IMadeYouReadThis

 
IMadeYouReadThis's Avatar
 
Drives: 02 Camaro SS 6M / 11 GMC Sierra
Join Date: Mar 2017
Location: Pickering, Ontario, Canada
Posts: 1,096
Quote:
Originally Posted by LuvMI View Post
Never discount sound. It's the gateway to your emotions. As a kid I never pretended speeding down the hwy in a quiet ass car.
+1
IMadeYouReadThis is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 08-28-2017, 05:50 PM   #206
IMadeYouReadThis

 
IMadeYouReadThis's Avatar
 
Drives: 02 Camaro SS 6M / 11 GMC Sierra
Join Date: Mar 2017
Location: Pickering, Ontario, Canada
Posts: 1,096
Quote:
Originally Posted by Marty McFlew View Post
HP wise but not in Tq. Like I said the drawback for the V6 is the low Tq and sound. Otherwise its a great engine.
NPP V6 is unbelievable. It sounds like an exotic. Plus it is all about time and 0 to 60 in 5.1 seconds and perhaps less is great.
IMadeYouReadThis is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 08-28-2017, 06:24 PM   #207
Chez
 
Chez's Avatar
 
Drives: 2016 Camaro 2SS
Join Date: Mar 2017
Location: PA
Posts: 132
Gonna play devil's advocate here and say if you want to buy a car to mod, go S550 Mustang. It has 5x the aftermarket support, especially if you go the 4cyl. route.

I do agree that the 2.0 is more mod friendly, but longevity can be an issue, and if drag racing is a priority, V8 all day and twice on Sunday.
__________________
Traded-2017 1LT V6 GMPP Intake, Flowmaster American Thunder axle-back, Vmax Ported throttle body, ZL1/1LE sway bars, V6 1LE Suspension,SEMA grille, Blade spoiler, Apex PS-7 18x10
Chez is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 08-28-2017, 06:26 PM   #208
cellsafemode


 
cellsafemode's Avatar
 
Drives: 2016 Camaro 1LT
Join Date: Jan 2016
Location: California
Posts: 3,522
what's funny is all the talk about low end torque.

When you slam the pedal down, you're at < 3k rpm for about a fraction of a second. The rest of the time you're up in the 5-7k rpm range. 8speed trans does the job of keeping the engine rpms well within the power band the entire time you have the pedal down.

Low end torque only really matters when you're hauling trailers or climbing steep hills. Two things where you're probably not looking to break speed records doing unless you're racing a hill climb course.

As far as tracking on courses with lots of turns so you're braking and accelerating, the V6 camaro shows that it's the suspension that matters most here not the engine. http://www.carscoops.com/2016/09/new...-quick-as.html. So also not a valid argument.

This might have been a problem with lower cylinder engines back when transmissions had 3 gears and an overdrive ...not so much now. At least not that I've seen.

Last edited by cellsafemode; 08-28-2017 at 06:29 PM. Reason: s/have/had
cellsafemode is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 08-28-2017, 07:33 PM   #209
Tumba
 
Tumba's Avatar
 
Drives: 2017 Camaro 1SS 1LE Hyper Blue
Join Date: May 2017
Location: Roy Utah
Posts: 19
Low end torque makes a world of difference with a 6 speed manual for daily driving in my experience. With the 8 speed and soon 10 speed autos I agree the gearing more than makes up for it.

I know things like changing the final drive ratio can help in 6 speed cars with dead spots due to peaky power curves. It was one of the the mods I seriously considered on my v6 before I decided to trade up instead.

I think if I was interested in an auto the v6 would have been a more appealing option.

A lot of reviews of manual v6 Camaros stated the gearing felt too long and suited more towards the V8. Any manual v6 owners agree or disagree with this?

Sent from my ONE A2005 using Tapatalk
Tumba is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 08-28-2017, 07:54 PM   #210
viewska
 
Drives: Red Hot Vert
Join Date: Oct 2016
Location: San Antonio, TX
Posts: 134
As somebody who owns a v6, and who has owned a v10 m5 in the past: I speak from my own experiences in saying that while I am still longing for the extra power the lightweight v6 does the job. In fact, I wring it out everyday, and have a blast doing it.

With that said, the aftermarket for the v6 is truly sad.... the v6 is the red headed step child of aftermarket performance. You'd have a much better time with the 2.0t if you're into aftermarket performance mods.

Good luck! Hope we're helping you work it out and look forward another owner joining the ranks
viewska is offline   Reply With Quote
 
Post Reply


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump


All times are GMT -5. The time now is 09:28 AM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.9 Beta 4
Copyright ©2000 - 2026, vBulletin Solutions, Inc.