|
|
#29 | ||
|
Account Suspended
Drives: 2017 Camaro ZL1 A10 Join Date: May 2012
Location: NJ
Posts: 7,692
|
Quote:
Quote:
|
||
|
|
|
|
|
#30 | |
![]() Drives: 2017 ZL1 A10 Join Date: Jul 2014
Location: Atlanta, GA
Posts: 394
|
Quote:
Reason I wanted to stay stock heads/cam is because I hate paying for labor and I'll be doing all the work myself. With all the builds I've done I've never replaced a cam lol. One shop told me that the engine should be pulled to make it easier. So it's intimidating at this point and I haven't found hardly any how to guides on it. I know I can do it myself I just have to work up the confidence and get through the unknowns of the LT4 which right now are a lot to me since all I've dealt with has been LS up until this point. Additionally since the heads have to come off for deleting the AFM lifters etc then I might as well have the heads CNC'ed and I don't see hardly any programs for them yet and those that are available aren't that great because its a lackluster casting to begin with. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
#31 |
![]() Drives: Nothing Join Date: Jul 2015
Location: USA
Posts: 233
|
Why does the LT4 require heads/Cam when making lots of power and the Hellcat doesn't? Are their heads and cam better or is it due to something else? I guess I'm just used to forged DOHC motors (03 Cobra). Just bolt on a bigger blower with supporting mods. No need to open up the engine.
|
|
|
|
|
|
#32 | |
|
Drives: Fast Join Date: Mar 2015
Location: Michigan
Posts: 3,696
|
Quote:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
#33 |
![]() Drives: Nothing Join Date: Jul 2015
Location: USA
Posts: 233
|
But why doesn't the Hellcat need a cam and the LT4 does? A shop slapped a 4.5L Whipple on a Hellcat and it made 1,000 rwhp without opening the engine. Seems like all the procharged LT4 builds need a cam and heads. Why is that? I've heard the words Fuel lobe on the Cam but never really understood that. Does the LT4 need a cam due to fueling? I guess I just don't understand it.
|
|
|
|
|
|
#34 | |
![]() Drives: 2017 ZL1 A10 Join Date: Jul 2014
Location: Atlanta, GA
Posts: 394
|
Quote:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
#35 | |
|
Account Suspended
Drives: 2017 Camaro ZL1 A10 Join Date: May 2012
Location: NJ
Posts: 7,692
|
Quote:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
#36 | |
![]() Drives: 2017 ZL1 A10 Join Date: Jul 2014
Location: Atlanta, GA
Posts: 394
|
Quote:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
#37 |
|
Drives: Fast Join Date: Mar 2015
Location: Michigan
Posts: 3,696
|
Not sure what some people don't understand here...The cam NEEDS to go above 700-720 RWHP *OR THERE ABOUTS*. You can be "Not convinced we need a cam swap, lol!!" all you want, but seriously, you must be knew to the LS and now LT performance world or something because I've never really ran into someone who doesn't believe in a cam swap for an engine. Opening up the engine is really a stupid way to sway it, reminds me of a doctor's scare tactic...You pull the front assembly off the engine (10 bolts?) pull a chain and gear, yank out a knobby stick and put another one in. Experienced people and experienced shops can do it as good as GM. No issues, no questions asked. If you make a good choice in cams, you'll still have drivability, gas mileage, and you'll add what the engine needs: AIRFLOW & FUEL....And you'll get some good sound too.
And yes, of course the 1.7L blower is a limiter. A big one. But it only matters once you're actually PUSHING that stock blower that you will see how much more the BIGGER blowers make. So like I said, don't let me convince you, go put a Whipple or ProCharger on it without doing Heads/Cam and pulley the shit out of it to make it make 700-800 RWHP. First off, you'll hit a power wall, a heat wall, and you won't be able to get enough fuel in it with the stock fuel lobe. Notice a swap on a otherwise stock car does hardly nothing. Same results can be achieved with an upper pulley and intake on the stock 1.7L. Weapon X: http://www.ctsvowners.com/forum/152-...o-results.html Now on the other hand, putting that blower on a cammed LT4 (Whipple 2.9) results in MUCH more impressive results: https://www.corvetteforum.com/forums...ple-2-9-a.html Both builds ran about the same boost: "14psi and ended around 16psi" "15.5 PSI". Yet 300 HP separates them. Hmmm? |
|
|
|
|
|
#38 | ||
|
Bring It
|
Quote:
Quote:
If I recall, WeaponX or another builder, can't recall, did one that was up around 18lbs...in that neighborhood it seems like it is the limiting factor. It's reached its point of efficacy. Do I understand correctly?
__________________
2017 Camaro ZL1 M6 - Everything but the sunroof - Sold 2010 Camaro SS - 650RWHP Daily Driver - Traded |
||
|
|
|
|
|
#39 | |
|
Bring It
|
Quote:
__________________
2017 Camaro ZL1 M6 - Everything but the sunroof - Sold 2010 Camaro SS - 650RWHP Daily Driver - Traded |
|
|
|
|
|
|
#40 |
|
Drives: 2022 Lt1 A10 Join Date: Nov 2015
Location: clark, mo
Posts: 8,882
|
I would choose the Magnuson, its proven and its gonna make pretty much the same hp/torque as the Whipple. Haven't seen one whipple LT1/LT4 go down the track, not even a time slip. Magnuson has already went 9.92@140, no internal mods, no headers, etc. It does have the upgraded lift pump and high pressure pump and Drag Pack.
|
|
|
|
|
|
#41 |
![]() Drives: 2017 zl1. Headers intake pulley e Join Date: Oct 2014
Location: Okc
Posts: 174
|
The real reason you need a cam over 700 is you run out of fuel and the high pressure side in the lt4 is cam driven so you need a bigger fuel lobe. Jms is a great shop I drive from Oklahoma to have them do all of my work!
|
|
|
|
|
|
#42 | |
![]() Drives: 2017 ZL1 A10 Join Date: Jul 2014
Location: Atlanta, GA
Posts: 394
|
Quote:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Post Reply
|
|
|