|
|
#15 |
![]() Drives: 2017 RS Turbo Join Date: Aug 2016
Location: Burlington, Ontario
Posts: 376
|
LSD wins the pot for me. You pay a premium for the auto yet it does not come with the better diff. Also NLS is a blast to shift through!
Again, its up to you! Drive both and then pull the trigger
__________________
2017 1LT | RS | 2.0T | M6
331 rwhp , 350 rwtq ZZP Intercooler | ZZP Catted DP | Magnaflow Catback | Injen CAI | Tuned (BBR) | CNC Honed Turbo (TPC) w 14lb actuator |
|
|
|
|
|
#16 |
![]() Drives: 2016 Camaro Join Date: Mar 2016
Location: Ohio 44824
Posts: 186
|
Not sure if the LTs get the rev-match feature with their manuals or not, but that's one of the main reasons I went with the M6 in my Camaro.
__________________
2016 Garnet Red 2SS M6 MRC NPP and Sunroof
100% Stock - 12.10 @ 115.6mph - 3620 lbs lookin' at it |
|
|
|
|
|
#17 | |
|
2016 Camaro 1LT 2.0T
Drives: Nemesis Join Date: Feb 2011
Location: Albuquerque, NM
Posts: 844
|
Quote:
I've been bouncing back & forth between whether I should've got the auto vs my manual, but lately I've finally got the feel for how the M6 wants to be shifted for what I consider optimum power & fuel efficiency: - 1st gear: 0-15mph - 2nd gear: 16-30 mph - 3rd gear: 31-45 mph - 4th gear: 46-60 mph - 5th gear: 61-75 mph (stay in 5th for most highway driving in town) - 6th gear: 76 & up (truly a cruising gear for road trips, less city use) I've been getting 28.4 mpg the past couple weeks and don't have to feel like I'm constantly shifting when I keep the rpm's near 3000. Prior to this, I use to baby the rpm's and keep them near 2200-2500, hated the laggy feeling combined with constant shifting; that style gave me 27 mpg. Last edited by edgehead2000; 05-03-2017 at 08:38 PM. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Post Reply
|
|
|