|
|
#57 |
![]() Drives: 2017 Summit White 2SS Join Date: Jan 2017
Location: Dublin, CA
Posts: 546
|
Agreed. It looks a bit off to me. I prefer twin turbos mounted in the engine bay visible, with the the air tubes going down into the front bumper area. not sure if there is room to do that though with our cars...
|
|
|
|
|
|
#58 |
|
Dyno Show Queen LOL
Drives: 16 SS & 17 ZL1 Both Yellow Join Date: Jan 2014
Location: Houston
Posts: 4,354
|
Just for comparison reasons to be able to compare to other FI systems.........
What is the max boost able to be ran on the stock fuel system and what is the rear wheel hp and torque for an auto and manual... NO METH just plane ole 93? For Example manufactures list like this.... Eforce 580rwhp 548lbs Procharger 550 rwwhp 500 lbs and so on....
__________________
Kong Ported 2650, Crawford Racing Port Injection, Weapon X 112mm Adapter, NW112mm TB, Livernois Ported LT4 Heads, Lingenfelter GT32 stealth cam, Haltech Elite, and Carbon by Trufiber |
|
|
|
|
|
#59 | |
![]() Drives: BLUE CAMARO ZL1 1LE M6 Join Date: Jun 2009
Location: ON THE DYNO WATERBURY CT.
Posts: 15,453
|
Quote:
Anything above that your dancing on the landmines. It take .5 lb. of fuel per hour to make 1 HP. lb. of fuel is a lb. of fuel The variations you see are more a product of Dyno testing procedures and calibration. Turbos can stretch that number a bit only because of the parasitic loss difference. Fuel systems may not be as good in some cars than others due to productions tolerances and wear. As we have seen in other models as the cars age the fuel systems can no longer supply as much fuel as they once did. Never push a fuel system and you will never have an engine failure due to fuel supply issues.
__________________
www.jannettyracing.com
Celebrating 39 years Performance parts, Installation, Fabrication, Dyno tuning, Remote custom tuning, and alignments. 203-753-7223 Waterbury CT. 06705 email tedj@jannettyracing.com |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Post Reply
|
|
|