[Atomic Ed]

Originally Posted by toohighpsi

Traction not a problem Les

Back up and running? Good news!

[Perdieu]

Originally Posted by toohighpsi

Traction not a problem Les

Attachment 850539

Looks damn good. Can't wait to put my S77 on tomorrow..

Are you running a 26" front

[toohighpsi]

Originally Posted by Atomic Ed

Back up and running? Good news!

It is, now with aluminum driveshaft and ZL1 in tank pump, should be back on the dyno next week when I'm back in town.

Originally Posted by Perdieu

Looks damn good. Can't wait to put my S77 on tomorrow..

Are you running a 26" front

Yes, while I was afraid that they would be too small, I actually really like them on the car, had to pull the ABS fuse with this tire size combination as the front are always spinning too fast.

[RageWorx]

Originally Posted by toohighpsi

Traction not a problem Les

Attachment 850539

Damn that is sharp looking with the WELD wheel/tire setup ... got me thinking

-Jon

[Atomic Ed]

Originally Posted by Stefano

A lash cap is necessary in order to pick up the gap, when a smaller base circle is incorporated. (We have used a 14% fuel pump lobe with no lash cap.)

I believe these diaphragm high side fuel pumps, produce linear pressure and while we haven't tested a lash cap on a stock LT1 pump (Note: LT4s have a slightly longer plunger.) I do not see how starting the plunger out higher but keeping the stoke the same will increase the pressure?

https://issuu.com/cpg-development/docs/cpg5-2014/3

I'm still mulling this statement over in my mind. On first glance, it does make sense. But further thought on my part makes me ask if with the lash cap, wouldn't the extra height engage the plunger sooner and roll off the plunger later? Wouldn't this effectively increase the stroke?