Homepage Garage Wiki Register Community Calendar Today's Posts Search
#Camaro6
Go Back   CAMARO6 > Engine | Drivetrain | Powertrain Technical Discussions > Mechanical Maintenance: Break-in / Oil & Fluids / Servicing


AWE Tuning


Post Reply
 
Thread Tools
Old 12-24-2015, 10:45 PM   #15
Cautionary tale
 
Drives: 2016 camaro 2ss summit white
Join Date: Dec 2015
Location: Rockford illinois
Posts: 272
Hey

Quote:
Originally Posted by PalmerGA View Post
FYI... a catch can doesn't benefit your transmission (A8). It benefits your engine whether it be a V6 or V8.
yea I had caught the phrase true manual transmission on first mishimoto thread and got confused.... never heard of a catch can until I got here,lol... I guess it's more of a wise idea in a high performance vehicle, but I guess if I talked to a gm engineer he would say no... they have all got this tom hanks cast away "I have created fire, behold" mentality,lol
Cautionary tale is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 12-24-2015, 11:50 PM   #16
Capricio
 
Drives: 2000 WS6
Join Date: Dec 2014
Location: AZ
Posts: 676
You can get lost in all the contradictory information on the internet regarding catch cans. ...and then if you decide on a catch can, even more contradictions on one vs two cans, sealed vs vented, etc. Clearly there were some issues with the early LS1 that led to the LS6 valley cover having a nozzle of it's own. Also consider the catch can included with the new camaro is a design change that acknowledges a change was useful. For all GM's thorough testing, there is no testbed like production before they will grudgingly make a design change midstream.

I've tried a couple in the past that never seemed to catch much and I still had oily residue in my intake. Some claim to be far more effective than others, which is probably the case, but just can't bring myself to spend $500 or more on a cylinder with some steel wool inside.

On my forced induction build, I intend to use a dual can vented setup with large hoses and -an fittings to keep velocity low. I think most aftermarket catch cans are too small for the volume of air a large V8 crankcase can produce. The bottom line is if it catches a significant amount of oil, then you probably need it. Sadly, you have to try it to find out for yourself.
Capricio is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 12-25-2015, 03:02 AM   #17
Cautionary tale
 
Drives: 2016 camaro 2ss summit white
Join Date: Dec 2015
Location: Rockford illinois
Posts: 272
Hey

Quote:
Originally Posted by Capricio View Post
You can get lost in all the contradictory information on the internet regarding catch cans. ...and then if you decide on a catch can, even more contradictions on one vs two cans, sealed vs vented, etc. Clearly there were some issues with the early LS1 that led to the LS6 valley cover having a nozzle of it's own. Also consider the catch can included with the new camaro is a design change that acknowledges a change was useful. For all GM's thorough testing, there is no testbed like production before they will grudgingly make a design change midstream.

I've tried a couple in the past that never seemed to catch much and I still had oily residue in my intake. Some claim to be far more effective than others, which is probably the case, but just can't bring myself to spend $500 or more on a cylinder with some steel wool inside.

On my forced induction build, I intend to use a dual can vented setup with large hoses and -an fittings to keep velocity low. I think most aftermarket catch cans are too small for the volume of air a large V8 crankcase can produce. The bottom line is if it catches a significant amount of oil, then you probably need it. Sadly, you have to try it to find out for yourself.
if they design a good one, I guess only variable is the way u drive,lol
Cautionary tale is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 12-25-2015, 08:53 AM   #18
PalmerGA


 
PalmerGA's Avatar
 
Drives: 2013 SIM 1SS/RS L99
Join Date: May 2012
Location: Southwest GA
Posts: 8,754
Quote:
Originally Posted by Cautionary tale View Post
yea I had caught the phrase true manual transmission on first mishimoto thread and got confused.... never heard of a catch can until I got here...
Me neither, but I've had them on my previous Camaro (2012 LT) and my current one (2013 SS). Despite what some may say as to their worth, I'm a believer. Just check what they "catch" between oil changes and you will be too.
__________________
2013 1SS/RS Coupe L99, Stainless Power Works LT Headers, SCT X4 Custom Tune from RDP, CAI Inc. Air Intake w/ Apex Scoop, VMAX CNC Ported Throttle Body, Solo Axle-Back Exhaust w/ J-pipes, Apex Catch Can, Husky Splash Guards, Heritage Grille, 3D Carbon Rear Spoiler, Oracle Chrome Turn Signal Bulbs, GM Reverse Light Trim Billets, Gorilla Black Locking Lugs, Emblem Pros Retro SS Badges/Custom Retro SS Kickplates/Under-hood Bowtie, 35% window Tint, Nitto Motivo Tires (6-8-18)
PalmerGA is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 12-31-2015, 06:27 PM   #19
bbrown450
 
bbrown450's Avatar
 
Drives: 2016 Mosaic Black 2SS
Join Date: Dec 2013
Location: Plant City
Posts: 408
FWIW installed an Elite Can on my C7 (same engine) and every oil change I had about (4) shot glass full at the minumum of oil that was destined to be re ingested and potentially add additional coking to valves ...just made sense to me and darn easy to install. My experience ...not an endorsement
bbrown450 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 01-04-2016, 10:28 AM   #20
Mishimoto
Account Suspended
 
Drives: Mostly Stock
Join Date: Jul 2012
Location: Wilmington, DE
Posts: 529
Quote:
Originally Posted by PalmerGA View Post
Me neither, but I've had them on my previous Camaro (2012 LT) and my current one (2013 SS). Despite what some may say as to their worth, I'm a believer. Just check what they "catch" between oil changes and you will be too.
Quote:
Originally Posted by bbrown450 View Post
FWIW installed an Elite Can on my C7 (same engine) and every oil change I had about (4) shot glass full at the minumum of oil that was destined to be re ingested and potentially add additional coking to valves ...just made sense to me and darn easy to install. My experience ...not an endorsement
Thanks for the input guys! Although we still have some evaluation to complete, the factory AOS setup is probably fairly efficient. That being said, this system does not address the PCV circuit, which we've found to pass a significant amount of oil into the manifold. Below is an image of our collection within a time-span of 1100 miles on our SS.



We are still putting miles on our SS and will report back when we empty the can a second time.

Thanks
-John
Mishimoto is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 01-09-2016, 05:37 PM   #21
mikeSS


 
mikeSS's Avatar
 
Drives: 2015 c7
Join Date: Nov 2009
Location: MI
Posts: 7,462
Quote:
Originally Posted by Mishimoto View Post
Thanks for the input guys! Although we still have some evaluation to complete, the factory AOS setup is probably fairly efficient. That being said, this system does not address the PCV circuit, which we've found to pass a significant amount of oil into the manifold. Below is an image of our collection within a time-span of 1100 miles on our SS.



We are still putting miles on our SS and will report back when we empty the can a second time.

Thanks
-John
I agree that carbon build up/oil in the intake does happen. GDI engine or not. I also believe the PCV system is one of the leading problems.

Where i always disagree or question is the rate at which this happens.

You posted a picture of a decent amount of oil at only 1k. So at 20k or 50k miles your intake valves should have a CRAZY amount of build up on them. You have have MASS amounts of people getting worse MPG, less power, and probably even failed motors. at only 20k miles. why would GM even warranty or design a engine like this?

thats what i dont understand.
mikeSS is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 01-12-2016, 09:19 AM   #22
Mishimoto
Account Suspended
 
Drives: Mostly Stock
Join Date: Jul 2012
Location: Wilmington, DE
Posts: 529
Quote:
Originally Posted by mikeSS View Post
I agree that carbon build up/oil in the intake does happen. GDI engine or not. I also believe the PCV system is one of the leading problems.

Where i always disagree or question is the rate at which this happens.

You posted a picture of a decent amount of oil at only 1k. So at 20k or 50k miles your intake valves should have a CRAZY amount of build up on them. You have have MASS amounts of people getting worse MPG, less power, and probably even failed motors. at only 20k miles. why would GM even warranty or design a engine like this?

thats what i dont understand.
Good points Mike. Keep in mind that all of this oil will not end up attaching to the valve. Some will coat the internal surfaces of the manifold and some of it will be burnt in the combustion chamber. Our goal with this kit is to reduce valve buildup as much as possible, it certainly will happen over time on just about any DI engine.

The amount we collected within 1K miles was very similar to other DI engines we've tested. We would prefer that this fluid does not reach the manifold, which is the reasoning behind our catch can kit. We are still putting additional miles on our prototype kit and will report back with results from our next check.

Thanks
-John
Mishimoto is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 01-13-2016, 05:57 AM   #23
mikeSS


 
mikeSS's Avatar
 
Drives: 2015 c7
Join Date: Nov 2009
Location: MI
Posts: 7,462
Quote:
Originally Posted by Mishimoto View Post
Good points Mike. Keep in mind that all of this oil will not end up attaching to the valve. Some will coat the internal surfaces of the manifold and some of it will be burnt in the combustion chamber. Our goal with this kit is to reduce valve buildup as much as possible, it certainly will happen over time on just about any DI engine.

The amount we collected within 1K miles was very similar to other DI engines we've tested. We would prefer that this fluid does not reach the manifold, which is the reasoning behind our catch can kit. We are still putting additional miles on our prototype kit and will report back with results from our next check.

Thanks
-John
well that makes sense.
mikeSS is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 01-05-2017, 03:52 PM   #24
JCRhea
 
JCRhea's Avatar
 
Drives: 2016 Camaro 1SS
Join Date: Dec 2016
Location: Henderson, CO
Posts: 32
Quote:
Originally Posted by Mishimoto View Post
Thanks for checking out our catch can thread! Any modern engine can benefit from a catch can system, especially DI-equipped vehicles. The lack of port injection further accentuate the valve buildup concern.

A catch can can definitely extend the life of your engine, improve reliability, and aid in power retention over time. We definitely recommend installing one!

-John
Should I be concerned with voided warranty? My dealer seems to think so. Thanks.
JCRhea is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 05-14-2017, 09:24 AM   #25
SSTony

 
SSTony's Avatar
 
Drives: SS Camaro
Join Date: Jul 2009
Location: Piscataway NJ
Posts: 1,782
Send a message via AIM to SSTony
Catch can will not hurt the engine. It can only help. The inly thing that hurts is how much these things are being sold at. These things should be closer to $100 than $200
__________________
SSTony is offline   Reply With Quote
 
Post Reply


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump


All times are GMT -5. The time now is 05:13 AM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.9 Beta 4
Copyright ©2000 - 2026, vBulletin Solutions, Inc.