|
|
#15 |
![]() Drives: 2016 camaro 2ss summit white Join Date: Dec 2015
Location: Rockford illinois
Posts: 272
|
Hey
yea I had caught the phrase true manual transmission on first mishimoto thread and got confused.... never heard of a catch can until I got here,lol... I guess it's more of a wise idea in a high performance vehicle, but I guess if I talked to a gm engineer he would say no... they have all got this tom hanks cast away "I have created fire, behold" mentality,lol
|
|
|
|
|
|
#16 |
![]() Drives: 2000 WS6 Join Date: Dec 2014
Location: AZ
Posts: 676
|
You can get lost in all the contradictory information on the internet regarding catch cans. ...and then if you decide on a catch can, even more contradictions on one vs two cans, sealed vs vented, etc. Clearly there were some issues with the early LS1 that led to the LS6 valley cover having a nozzle of it's own. Also consider the catch can included with the new camaro is a design change that acknowledges a change was useful. For all GM's thorough testing, there is no testbed like production before they will grudgingly make a design change midstream.
I've tried a couple in the past that never seemed to catch much and I still had oily residue in my intake. Some claim to be far more effective than others, which is probably the case, but just can't bring myself to spend $500 or more on a cylinder with some steel wool inside. On my forced induction build, I intend to use a dual can vented setup with large hoses and -an fittings to keep velocity low. I think most aftermarket catch cans are too small for the volume of air a large V8 crankcase can produce. The bottom line is if it catches a significant amount of oil, then you probably need it. Sadly, you have to try it to find out for yourself. |
|
|
|
|
|
#17 | |
![]() Drives: 2016 camaro 2ss summit white Join Date: Dec 2015
Location: Rockford illinois
Posts: 272
|
Hey
Quote:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
#18 |
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
Me neither, but I've had them on my previous Camaro (2012 LT) and my current one (2013 SS). Despite what some may say as to their worth, I'm a believer. Just check what they "catch" between oil changes and you will be too.
__________________
2013 1SS/RS Coupe L99, Stainless Power Works LT Headers, SCT X4 Custom Tune from RDP, CAI Inc. Air Intake w/ Apex Scoop, VMAX CNC Ported Throttle Body, Solo Axle-Back Exhaust w/ J-pipes, Apex Catch Can, Husky Splash Guards, Heritage Grille, 3D Carbon Rear Spoiler, Oracle Chrome Turn Signal Bulbs, GM Reverse Light Trim Billets, Gorilla Black Locking Lugs, Emblem Pros Retro SS Badges/Custom Retro SS Kickplates/Under-hood Bowtie, 35% window Tint, Nitto Motivo Tires (6-8-18)
|
|
|
|
|
|
#19 |
![]() Drives: 2016 Mosaic Black 2SS Join Date: Dec 2013
Location: Plant City
Posts: 408
|
FWIW installed an Elite Can on my C7 (same engine) and every oil change I had about (4) shot glass full at the minumum of oil that was destined to be re ingested and potentially add additional coking to valves ...just made sense to me and darn easy to install. My experience ...not an endorsement
|
|
|
|
|
|
#20 | ||
|
Account Suspended
Drives: Mostly Stock Join Date: Jul 2012
Location: Wilmington, DE
Posts: 529
|
Quote:
Quote:
![]() We are still putting miles on our SS and will report back when we empty the can a second time. Thanks -John |
||
|
|
|
|
|
#21 | |
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() Drives: 2015 c7 Join Date: Nov 2009
Location: MI
Posts: 7,462
|
Quote:
Where i always disagree or question is the rate at which this happens. You posted a picture of a decent amount of oil at only 1k. So at 20k or 50k miles your intake valves should have a CRAZY amount of build up on them. You have have MASS amounts of people getting worse MPG, less power, and probably even failed motors. at only 20k miles. why would GM even warranty or design a engine like this? thats what i dont understand. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
#22 | |
|
Account Suspended
Drives: Mostly Stock Join Date: Jul 2012
Location: Wilmington, DE
Posts: 529
|
Quote:
The amount we collected within 1K miles was very similar to other DI engines we've tested. We would prefer that this fluid does not reach the manifold, which is the reasoning behind our catch can kit. We are still putting additional miles on our prototype kit and will report back with results from our next check. Thanks -John |
|
|
|
|
|
|
#23 | |
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() Drives: 2015 c7 Join Date: Nov 2009
Location: MI
Posts: 7,462
|
Quote:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
#24 | |
![]() |
Quote:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
#25 |
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
Catch can will not hurt the engine. It can only help. The inly thing that hurts is how much these things are being sold at. These things should be closer to $100 than $200
__________________
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Post Reply
|
|
|