Homepage Garage Wiki Register Community Calendar Today's Posts Search
#Camaro6
Go Back   CAMARO6 > CAMARO6.com General Forums > 2016+ Camaro: 6th Gen Camaro general forum


Phastek Performance


Post Reply
 
Thread Tools
Old 01-05-2017, 11:59 AM   #1
JCRhea
 
JCRhea's Avatar
 
Drives: 2016 Camaro 1SS
Join Date: Dec 2016
Location: Henderson, CO
Posts: 32
Oil Catch Cans

I'm about a thousand miles into my LT1 and am thinking about installing an oil catch can. My dealer says that if a warranty issue comes up and they determine it's from the catch can than there's a chance it would be voided. Nothing but grey area with them. I'm sure GM engineers know what their doing with these motors but it'a also obvious that these catch cans do benefit the motor.

Does anyone have additional information on this? Thanks.
JCRhea is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 01-05-2017, 12:07 PM   #2
sub_ETCS_ret

 
sub_ETCS_ret's Avatar
 
Drives: 2019 Dodge Challenger Scat Pack
Join Date: Jun 2016
Location: WA
Posts: 1,390
Quote:
Originally Posted by JCRhea View Post
I'm about a thousand miles into my LT1 and am thinking about installing an oil catch can. My dealer says that if a warranty issue comes up and they determine it's from the catch can than there's a chance it would be voided. Nothing but grey area with them. I'm sure GM engineers know what their doing with these motors but it'a also obvious that these catch cans do benefit the motor.

Does anyone have additional information on this? Thanks.
I'm not trying to be rude but you should use the search function. Plenty of threads about this already.
__________________
"Submariners are a bunch of intelligent misfits that somehow seem to get along, understand each other and work well together." - overheard from a surface officer explaining to another sailor about Submariners
sub_ETCS_ret is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 01-05-2017, 01:00 PM   #3
wavsine
________/\_
 
wavsine's Avatar
 
Drives: Gen6 NGM RS
Join Date: Dec 2016
Location: DFW
Posts: 179
Send a message via Yahoo to wavsine
Quote:
Originally Posted by JCRhea View Post
I'm about a thousand miles into my LT1 and am thinking about installing an oil catch can. My dealer says that if a warranty issue comes up and they determine it's from the catch can than there's a chance it would be voided. Nothing but grey area with them. I'm sure GM engineers know what their doing with these motors but it'a also obvious that these catch cans do benefit the motor.

Does anyone have additional information on this? Thanks.
Most catch cans are worthless. Oil vapor is the enemy of intake valves in a DI engine and most of the catch cans on the market target liquid oil. There are some exceptions, such as the Mann Provent that has a replaceable filter element.

My advce is to run a high quality synthetic oil with a low NOACK that minimizes oil vapor in the engine. An occasional "Italian tuneup" might also help. (Keep the revs up above 3k on the highway for 20 minutes) This will get the intake valves nice and hot which combined with high intake velocities will help burn off light carbon deposits on the intake valves.
wavsine is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 01-05-2017, 01:00 PM   #4
E-Ray

 
Drives: 2016 Camaro 2SS, Nightfall Grey
Join Date: Nov 2012
Location: Sulphur La.
Posts: 1,680
Here's a link to purchase.
https://www.mishimoto.com/chevrolet-...-can-2016.html

here's some info.
http://www.camaro6.com/forums/showth...ighlight=catch
E-Ray is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 01-05-2017, 01:39 PM   #5
SS 1LE
マスタング = 遅い
 
SS 1LE's Avatar
 
Drives: 2017 Chevrolet Camaro SS 1LE
Join Date: Aug 2015
Location: Florida
Posts: 7,061
Quote:
Originally Posted by wavsine View Post
Most catch cans are worthless.
Can't agree at all...

I had a 2011 Mustang GT before this car, and that car is not even DI, and when I swapped intakes my stocker was full of oil residue after only 5000 miles. When I added my new intake I also added a catch can and 7500 miles later when I swapped to yet another intake, it was basically spotless. Oil in the intake (and other places) can lower the octane rating of your fuel, which could lead to detention and other issues. For the small amount a good catch can costs, and the ease of installation there is no negative to them, only positives if you ask me, and I had the proof.
__________________
SS 1LE is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 01-05-2017, 02:09 PM   #6
JCRhea
 
JCRhea's Avatar
 
Drives: 2016 Camaro 1SS
Join Date: Dec 2016
Location: Henderson, CO
Posts: 32
Quote:
Originally Posted by sub_ETCS_ret View Post
I'm not trying to be rude but you should use the search function. Plenty of threads about this already.
No hurt feelings here. Thanks for the advice I haven't been on this site very long. No harm reopening an existing thread for new discussions.
JCRhea is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 01-05-2017, 02:13 PM   #7
sub_ETCS_ret

 
sub_ETCS_ret's Avatar
 
Drives: 2019 Dodge Challenger Scat Pack
Join Date: Jun 2016
Location: WA
Posts: 1,390
Quote:
Originally Posted by JCRhea View Post
No hurt feelings here. Thanks for the advice I haven't been on this site very long. No harm reopening an existing thread for new discussions.
Some people feel like you are attacking them. Just wanted you to know that the search will find plenty.

Most of them are under here:

http://www.camaro6.com/forums/forumdisplay.php?f=231
__________________
"Submariners are a bunch of intelligent misfits that somehow seem to get along, understand each other and work well together." - overheard from a surface officer explaining to another sailor about Submariners
sub_ETCS_ret is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 01-05-2017, 02:16 PM   #8
JCRhea
 
JCRhea's Avatar
 
Drives: 2016 Camaro 1SS
Join Date: Dec 2016
Location: Henderson, CO
Posts: 32
Quote:
Originally Posted by wavsine View Post
Most catch cans are worthless. Oil vapor is the enemy of intake valves in a DI engine and most of the catch cans on the market target liquid oil. There are some exceptions, such as the Mann Provent that has a replaceable filter element.

My advce is to run a high quality synthetic oil with a low NOACK that minimizes oil vapor in the engine. An occasional "Italian tuneup" might also help. (Keep the revs up above 3k on the highway for 20 minutes) This will get the intake valves nice and hot which combined with high intake velocities will help burn off light carbon deposits on the intake valves.
Thanks.
JCRhea is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 01-05-2017, 02:53 PM   #9
wavsine
________/\_
 
wavsine's Avatar
 
Drives: Gen6 NGM RS
Join Date: Dec 2016
Location: DFW
Posts: 179
Send a message via Yahoo to wavsine
Quote:
Originally Posted by SS 1LE View Post
Can't agree at all...

I had a 2011 Mustang GT before this car, and that car is not even DI, and when I swapped intakes my stocker was full of oil residue after only 5000 miles
If you had liquid oil residue in the intake of a port injected engine after only 5k miles, I suspect you had a problem that should have been addressed prior to the installation of a catch can. Unlike a DI engine, port injected engines wash fuel across the intake valves. Without inspecting your engine, I can't attribute the installtion of the catch can with absolute resolution of your problem because there may be other crankcase ventilation issues at play.
wavsine is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 01-05-2017, 03:13 PM   #10
SS 1LE
マスタング = 遅い
 
SS 1LE's Avatar
 
Drives: 2017 Chevrolet Camaro SS 1LE
Join Date: Aug 2015
Location: Florida
Posts: 7,061
Quote:
Originally Posted by wavsine View Post
If you had liquid oil residue in the intake of a port injected engine after only 5k miles, I suspect you had a problem that should have been addressed prior to the installation of a catch can. Unlike a DI engine, port injected engines wash fuel across the intake valves. Without inspecting your engine, I can't attribute the installtion of the catch can with absolute resolution of your problem because there may be other crankcase ventilation issues at play.
Car had zero issues, ran like a top, made over average power, and was in the top five on the stock S197 Coyote list for years too...my old LS1 and LS6 had oil residue on the inside of the intake and TB as well, very common. Catch cans pretty much cured all of this for me, and others I know as well. You know how the pcv system works? You work on late model cars at all?
__________________

Last edited by SS 1LE; 01-05-2017 at 03:23 PM.
SS 1LE is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 01-05-2017, 03:30 PM   #11
cellsafemode


 
cellsafemode's Avatar
 
Drives: 2016 Camaro 1LT
Join Date: Jan 2016
Location: California
Posts: 3,522
The can would have to fill up/clog for it to be a warranty issue. The exception being the odd catch-can here or there that asks you to splice into other stuff vs simply sit in-line to the pcv tube leading to your intake/manifold.

So unless you're special and screw up the installation of a normal one... you should be fine.
cellsafemode is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 01-05-2017, 03:56 PM   #12
wavsine
________/\_
 
wavsine's Avatar
 
Drives: Gen6 NGM RS
Join Date: Dec 2016
Location: DFW
Posts: 179
Send a message via Yahoo to wavsine
Quote:
Originally Posted by SS 1LE View Post
Car had zero issues, ran like a top, made over average power, and was in the top five on the stock S197 Coyote list for years too...my old LS1 and LS6 had oil residue on the inside of the intake and TB as well, very common. Catch cans pretty much cured all of this for me, and others I know as well. You know how the pcv system works? You work on late model cars at all?
I am well versed in DI engines and have dealt with intake valve carbon fouling in BMW engines. I reiterate, most catch cans (eBay junk) don't work. Many amateurs think there is a benefit but don't fully understand DI. I will repeat, unless you are running a high end catch can such as a Provent that catches oil vapor, you are simply adding another maintenance chore, emptying a catch can. Why do you think BMW has to do walnut shell blasting to remove carbon deposits or are you not familiar with that? Ford has a patented valve reversion schema for their Duratec DI engine that has worked quite well. Many install catch cans on those systems as well out of ignorance. The Duratec has a built in oil separator (not to be confused with a catch can) that drains separated liquid oil back to the crankcase.

Running a low NOACK synthetic oil is the best thing you can do for a DI engine and it does not involve butchering your vehicle.
wavsine is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 01-05-2017, 06:14 PM   #13
SS 1LE
マスタング = 遅い
 
SS 1LE's Avatar
 
Drives: 2017 Chevrolet Camaro SS 1LE
Join Date: Aug 2015
Location: Florida
Posts: 7,061
Quote:
Originally Posted by wavsine View Post
I am well versed in DI engines and have dealt with intake valve carbon fouling in BMW engines. I reiterate, most catch cans (eBay junk) don't work. Many amateurs think there is a benefit but don't fully understand DI. I will repeat, unless you are running a high end catch can such as a Provent that catches oil vapor, you are simply adding another maintenance chore, emptying a catch can. Why do you think BMW has to do walnut shell blasting to remove carbon deposits or are you not familiar with that? Ford has a patented valve reversion schema for their Duratec DI engine that has worked quite well. Many install catch cans on those systems as well out of ignorance. The Duratec has a built in oil separator (not to be confused with a catch can) that drains separated liquid oil back to the crankcase.

Running a low NOACK synthetic oil is the best thing you can do for a DI engine and it does not involve butchering your vehicle.
BMW has lots of issues with their DI engines, I won't even get into that mess.

What Ford Duratec engines are you referring to? As far as I know Ford hasn't made a Duratec named car engine since the Mondeo based V6.

Many DI engines have built in oil separators like you describe actually, including the LT1 in the new Camaro. Problem is it is just on the clean side, not on the pcv side...

I personally would never run some Ebay junk on any of my cars. That's as bad as using a Turbonator.
__________________
SS 1LE is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 01-05-2017, 07:39 PM   #14
JCRhea
 
JCRhea's Avatar
 
Drives: 2016 Camaro 1SS
Join Date: Dec 2016
Location: Henderson, CO
Posts: 32
Quote:
Originally Posted by cellsafemode View Post
The can would have to fill up/clog for it to be a warranty issue. The exception being the odd catch-can here or there that asks you to splice into other stuff vs simply sit in-line to the pcv tube leading to your intake/manifold.

So unless you're special and screw up the installation of a normal one... you should be fine.
Not that special..haha. thanks!
JCRhea is offline   Reply With Quote
 
Post Reply


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump


All times are GMT -5. The time now is 03:15 AM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.9 Beta 4
Copyright ©2000 - 2026, vBulletin Solutions, Inc.