|
|
#15 |
![]() ![]() Drives: 2016 Camaro 2SS, NPP, A8, FBO, E85 Join Date: Oct 2016
Location: Springfield,VA
Posts: 884
|
Should I install the exhaust then intake and then get the tune? Or does it not matter when or which I do it first
Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
__________________
Well............ At least you tried. lol
|
|
|
|
|
|
#16 |
![]() Drives: Car Join Date: Aug 2015
Location: Orlando, FL
Posts: 240
|
My dealer quoted $120 for install/flash. Advisor stated they wouldn't be able to warranty the part if not purchased from their dealership.
__________________
the one and only
|
|
|
|
|
|
#17 | |
|
Blessed ❤️
Drives: 2017 1LT RS I4 Join Date: Sep 2016
Location: Indiana
Posts: 2,577
|
Quote:
__________________
2017 1LT RS I4 A8 BLACK ON BLACK
Kindness and compassion #OthersFirst |
|
|
|
|
|
|
#18 |
![]() Drives: 2016 Camaro LT | 3.6L V6 | A/T Join Date: Dec 2016
Location: South Carolina
Posts: 133
|
I was able to get them down to $425 on the intake here. Its only a few dollars more than you can find it online. See if they will work with you on pricing. They have at least 15% off retail to offer if not %25.
__________________
2016 Camaro LT | 3.6L V6 | A/T | Summit White w/Black RS Stripes
|
|
|
|
|
|
#19 | |
![]() Drives: Car Join Date: Aug 2015
Location: Orlando, FL
Posts: 240
|
Quote:
Ah, nice! I'll have to contact my dealer to see whether they'll budge on the price.
__________________
the one and only
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
#20 |
![]() ![]() Drives: '17 SS 50th Camaro Join Date: Apr 2012
Location: Tampa, Florida
Posts: 921
|
Am i the only one perplexed that there are still no numbers even from GM on what this intake is suppose to produce? It seems like they'd sell a lot more that way.
__________________
2017 50th Anniversary 2LT\RS - #1583 SOLD
2017 50th Anniversary 2SS - #3410 |
|
|
|
|
|
#21 |
![]() Drives: 2016 Camaro LT | 3.6L V6 | A/T Join Date: Dec 2016
Location: South Carolina
Posts: 133
|
The AFE is what 15HP under questionable conditions? I am not sure there are major gains to be had from a filter/intake replacement. Its more about the noise and the better filter right? I too would like to see results but being in this for 30 years, I always question what is published. Its common to see a 10HP gain/loss in Dyno runs at this HP. Fuel, temps and humidity have a lot to do with the results. Who says they are not propaganda in the end?
__________________
2016 Camaro LT | 3.6L V6 | A/T | Summit White w/Black RS Stripes
|
|
|
|
|
|
#22 |
![]() Drives: Car Join Date: Aug 2015
Location: Orlando, FL
Posts: 240
|
I, too, wonder about the potential gain from this intake; not knowing is the only reason I haven't bought it yet, despite my desire to.
__________________
the one and only
|
|
|
|
|
|
#23 |
![]() Drives: 2016 Camaro LT | 3.6L V6 | A/T Join Date: Dec 2016
Location: South Carolina
Posts: 133
|
I am having this installed next Wednesday so I am trying to get a local shop to do a before and after run. They want $200 bucks for the Dyno runs (two runs on different days). I dont have any options as they are the only place within 60 miles with a Dyno. I am trying to work this out with my schedule as we all want to see the real difference.
I do expect a fractional gain. Think about this: Dont you think the CAI and factory flash would result in better gains than just the CAI? Hell, you could Dyno any car and just remove the intake and expect the same or less from the AFE right?
__________________
2016 Camaro LT | 3.6L V6 | A/T | Summit White w/Black RS Stripes
|
|
|
|
|
|
#24 | |
|
Blessed ❤️
Drives: 2017 1LT RS I4 Join Date: Sep 2016
Location: Indiana
Posts: 2,577
|
Quote:
__________________
2017 1LT RS I4 A8 BLACK ON BLACK
Kindness and compassion #OthersFirst |
|
|
|
|
|
|
#25 | |
![]() Drives: Many Join Date: Sep 2016
Location: Colorado
Posts: 220
|
Quote:
As for the CAI, every manufacturer does everything they can to send their cars out the door with the best gas mileage and performance possible. I would expect the GM or any other CAI to be louder, but whether it actually translates into power? Probably not noticeable. Here is a good example. When the 2012 Boss 302 came out, people said the filter and intake were junk, the intake air was too hot, etc. etc. Companies came out with new CAIs and people bought them. Funny though, no one saw any performance increases. When the 2013 Boss 302 came out, it had Ford's TrackApp, which shows intake air temp right on the screen. Turns out, the stock intake is completely awesome, and even in massively hot temps under hard use, the intake air is rarely more than 10F higher than outside air temp if the car is moving, and usually it is within a degree or two. So much for the "Cold Air Intake". |
|
|
|
|
|
|
#26 |
![]() Drives: 2016 Camaro LT | 3.6L V6 | A/T Join Date: Dec 2016
Location: South Carolina
Posts: 133
|
Sorry guys but I couldnt work out the details with the Dyno shop. My car is at the dealership now for the install. I guess I will only have the seat of the pants feel to report.
__________________
2016 Camaro LT | 3.6L V6 | A/T | Summit White w/Black RS Stripes
|
|
|
|
|
|
#27 |
![]() ![]() Drives: ^^^This Join Date: Nov 2015
Location: Virginia Beach, VA
Posts: 747
|
Dealer quoted me a total with parts and labor of $620. Im also waiting for someone to post a dyno before I buy it
![]()
|
|
|
|
|
|
#28 |
![]() Drives: 2016 Camaro LT | 3.6L V6 | A/T Join Date: Dec 2016
Location: South Carolina
Posts: 133
|
Thats too much. I wanted the filter regardless of HP increase. I like the sound they produce and its easy to clean the filter. That plus my stock air box was off a bit. I had a gap of about 1/2 inch from the air feed into the air box flowing onto that wonderful paper filter. Crappy job from the factory but I knew it wouldnt be there long.
__________________
2016 Camaro LT | 3.6L V6 | A/T | Summit White w/Black RS Stripes
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Post Reply
|
|
|