|
|
#1 |
![]() Drives: 18 6.2 Join Date: Mar 2016
Location: AZ
Posts: 14
|
I've searched and noticed no one has done a dyno on a V6 manual yet so I did some dyno runs today. It's my first time having done a dyno so any questions you may have I may not be able to answer. Car is fully stock.
|
|
|
|
|
|
#2 |
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() Drives: 16 Camaro SS, 15 Colorado Join Date: May 2009
Location: Jefferson City, Missouri
Posts: 13,969
|
Perfect.
With an assumed 15% drivetrain loss, around 280ish is exactly what I'd expect to see on these cars with a manual transmission. What gear did you run the car in during your dyno runs? Its too bad that basic bolt ons and tune are not going to be easy to come by for this new V6. It was slow going for the 5th gen. I fear it may end up being even worse for the 6th gen now that the turbo 4 is an option. But based on those numbers, an intake and tune alone should get you at or just past the 300rwhp mark. That would be pretty awesome to see. If the 6th gen V6 gets other options such as high flow cats, ported intake, ported T/B, and such, I can see pushing 320ish rwhp combined with a tune and intake.
__________________
2016 Camaro 1SS - 8-speed - NPP - Black bowties
2010 Camaro 1LT V6 (Sold. I will miss her!) |
|
|
|
|
|
#3 |
|
Red Hot
Drives: 2017 Camaro RS Join Date: Nov 2016
Location: Brighton, MI
Posts: 47
|
![]() ![]() ![]() The V6 is what I am most seriously considering for my car - thanks for posting up...very nice results! |
|
|
|
|
|
#4 | |
![]() Drives: 18 6.2 Join Date: Mar 2016
Location: AZ
Posts: 14
|
Quote:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
#5 |
![]() Drives: 18 6.2 Join Date: Mar 2016
Location: AZ
Posts: 14
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
#6 |
![]() Drives: '16 Camaro, Pontiac Grand Prix (x2) Join Date: Sep 2016
Location: Space Coast
Posts: 76
|
Thanks for this!
__________________
2016 Hyper Blue 3.6 M6 | 15% Tint, Black Bowties, Leather Knee Pads, Borla ATAKs, blackout tails, Diode Dynamics side markers Next up: body color antenna, T7 splitter, Blade Spoiler, RS/SS headlight conversion
|
|
|
|
|
|
#7 |
![]() Drives: 2016 V6 1LT RS NPP NFG Join Date: Apr 2016
Location: Philadelphia, PA
Posts: 20
|
This is awesome. Great post
|
|
|
|
|
|
#8 |
![]() ![]() Drives: 2016 Camaro 2SS, NPP, A8, FBO, E85 Join Date: Oct 2016
Location: Springfield,VA
Posts: 884
|
Wait so I have a question, why isn't it 335hp like advertised?
Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
__________________
Well............ At least you tried. lol
|
|
|
|
|
|
#9 | |
![]() Drives: '16 Camaro, Pontiac Grand Prix (x2) Join Date: Sep 2016
Location: Space Coast
Posts: 76
|
Quote:
It is; the 335 is at the crank. ![]() Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
__________________
2016 Hyper Blue 3.6 M6 | 15% Tint, Black Bowties, Leather Knee Pads, Borla ATAKs, blackout tails, Diode Dynamics side markers Next up: body color antenna, T7 splitter, Blade Spoiler, RS/SS headlight conversion
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
#10 |
![]() ![]() Drives: 2016 Camaro 2SS, NPP, A8, FBO, E85 Join Date: Oct 2016
Location: Springfield,VA
Posts: 884
|
I'm confused. What's the difference between the two. Sorry I'm new to this type of stuff
Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
__________________
Well............ At least you tried. lol
|
|
|
|
|
|
#11 | |
![]() Drives: '16 Camaro, Pontiac Grand Prix (x2) Join Date: Sep 2016
Location: Space Coast
Posts: 76
|
Quote:
There is power loss by having to go through the drivetrain (transmission, driveshaft, differential, wheels). The 335 is the raw power made by an engine not turning any of those things, just itself at the flywheel or crank. When you add accessories (air conditioning, anything the drive belt has on it) is robbing power because engine is spinning it (drag) and then the drivetrain also has resistance. A manual transmission car has less drivetrain loss than an automatic typically. Less resistance from the manual than automatic. Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
__________________
2016 Hyper Blue 3.6 M6 | 15% Tint, Black Bowties, Leather Knee Pads, Borla ATAKs, blackout tails, Diode Dynamics side markers Next up: body color antenna, T7 splitter, Blade Spoiler, RS/SS headlight conversion
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
#12 |
![]() Drives: BMW 128i w/serious Bowtie Lust Join Date: Oct 2016
Location: Denver
Posts: 16
|
The torque (flat) curve is really nice. 15% loss for a Mustang dyno is pretty good too from Chevy stated crank/brake figures.
|
|
|
|
|
|
#13 |
![]() Drives: Car Join Date: Aug 2015
Location: Orlando, FL
Posts: 240
|
Awesome numbers! Thanks for sharing.
Gotta wonder, though, if it had been done in 5th gear (1:1 ratio on the manual), by how much would the peak HP/TQ numbers change?
__________________
the one and only
Last edited by cryssm; 12-01-2016 at 10:16 PM. |
|
|
|
|
|
#14 | |
![]() ![]() ![]() Drives: 2016 V6 RS Camaro 6MT Join Date: Aug 2015
Location: Portland, OR
Posts: 1,102
|
Quote:
But we also have a slight problem. A 1:1 ratio puts the wheel speed beyond 155 mph where the V6 is governed. So we'd be missing out on the last 500 RPM or so. Likely the reason 4th gear was used.
__________________
Summit White 2LT RS V6 ZN2 NPP m6 khalihari interior. Order placed 9/26/15 - Picked up 12/17/15!
![]() |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Post Reply
|
| Tags |
| #v6 #dyno |
|
|