[JANNETTYRACING]

Originally Posted by RideZX6R

Got ya

Follow up question...

Can an LT4/Z06 fuel pump be used?

Yes the LT4 pump and injectors as a set is best upgrade up to aprox 850 RWHP, and soon to be released are even larger pumps and injectors that we will be testing.

Ted.

[RideZX6R]

Originally Posted by JANNETTYRACING

Yes the LT4 pump and injectors as a set is best upgrade up to aprox 850 RWHP, and soon to be released are even larger pumps and injectors that we will be testing.

Ted.

I have a feeling I'd do that instead of the booster then. Simply because I know myself well enough to know that cam+bolt ons will not be enough some day and I'll need fueling for a blower

[LesBaer]

Originally Posted by Fraxum

Picked up the SS today and drove it home. The sound in Track and Sport is loud, but much quieter in Tour and S&I. Quiet on the highway in all modes. Zero drone. Amazing. It feels much stronger on the top end. A track test will have to wait until next week.

Also Ted's crew fitted the stock side covers on the MSD and it looks great! Great job by Ted and crew. Highly recommended.

He also did mine back in June and it screams like a bat out of hell with the headers. It's very loud when you first get it, but it will quiet down a little after you put some miles on it. I've put roughly 9k miles on mine since getting it back and it's been flawless.

I've actually had them do everything on my car come to think of it. He runs a tight operation so there's no BS to deal with. Good, honest people that do good work. Hopefully those new aftermarket fuel system components are available in the spring. I'll definitely be bringing it back to dial up my boost

[JANNETTYRACING]

Originally Posted by LesBaer

He also did mine back in June and it screams like a bat out of hell with the headers. It's very loud when you first get it, but it will quiet down a little after you put some miles on it. I've put roughly 9k miles on mine since getting it back and it's been flawless.

I've actually had them do everything on my car come to think of it. He runs a tight operation so there's no BS to deal with. Good, honest people that do good work. Hopefully those new aftermarket fuel system components are available in the spring. I'll definitely be bringing it back to dial up my boost

The Pres of Magnuson Superchargers was here for a day and we have a lot of stuff up and coming for you.

Thank you for your business and support.

Ted.

[ender2664]

Why does phastek say the gains are a lot higher and have dyno graphs that show it too?

[toohighpsi]

Originally Posted by JANNETTYRACING

For daily driver street use I would recommend the Oiled filter for racing I would recommend the Dry filter.

The Dry filter was about 3-4 HP better.

Very nice job on the testing! Your numbers also agree with the flow bench - 880CFM @ 7.70" H20 Dry and 829CFM @7.70" Oil, looking forward to track testing soon!

[PRAY]

Originally Posted by toohighpsi

Very nice job on the testing! Your numbers also agree with the flow bench - 880CFM @ 7.70" H20 Dry and 829CFM @7.70" Oil, looking forward to track testing soon!

Now that's awesome information right there. I was going to try to flow them both as well but my bench wouldn't do it. Is there anyway you could hook up the stock box and filter and flow that. I think that would show us the true potential of the RF system.

[JANNETTYRACING]

Originally Posted by ender2664

Why does phastek say the gains are a lot higher and have dyno graphs that show it too?

Typically testing procedures are not consistent with SAE standards.

I don't believe anyone is malicious but often will take low stock numbers and compare it to the best After numbers.

1 dyno pull against another.

I spend countless hours on Both Engine and Chassis dynomometers over the last 30 years and apply that experience to collect Real Accurate Repeatable Data.

For instance we have hundreds of factory stock dyno pulls on both auto and manual versions so we know for a fact what is real and what is skewed.

I hope this clears thing up for you and if not don't hesitate to ask.

Thank you

Ted.

[oldman]

Originally Posted by ender2664

Why does phastek say the gains are a lot higher and have dyno graphs that show it too?

Try as you might, you can't race dynos.

[cncmotors]

we are expexting similar numbers with JRE custom tune soon! Ted, I just sent you an email for custom tune request! I can't wait to see the number in person

[PRAY]

Originally Posted by JANNETTYRACING

Typically testing procedures are not consistent with SAE standards.

I don't believe anyone is malicious but often will take low stock numbers and compare it to the best After numbers.

1 dyno pull against another.

I spend countless hours on Both Engine and Chassis dynomometers over the last 30 years and apply that experience to collect Real Accurate Repeatable Data.

For instance we have hundreds of factory stock dyno pulls on both auto and manual versions so we know for a fact what is real and what is skewed.

I hope this clears thing up for you and if not don't hesitate to ask.

Thank you

Ted.

Ted,

What correction factor if any should those of us use that don't have your experience or facilities to be as consistent as possible. I think we all want to put out consistent accurate data. I hadn't given any thought to the correction factor being an issue with keeping the car strapped down to the dyno for back to back testing. I have tried to follow the rest of your protocol procedures and it has made more consistent testing for sure. Thanks for all the hard work and data. It is vital to the community.

[JANNETTYRACING]

Originally Posted by PRAY

Ted,

What correction factor if any should those of us use that don't have your experience or facilities to be as consistent as possible. I think we all want to put out consistent accurate data. I hadn't given any thought to the correction factor being an issue with keeping the car strapped down to the dyno for back to back testing. I have tried to follow the rest of your protocol procedures and it has made more consistent testing for sure. Thanks for all the hard work and data. It is vital to the community.

We always use Corrected data this takes the changing conditions out of the picture.

STP is Standard Temp and Pressure which is 60 Degrees dry air, 29.92 Baro.

It doesn't matter what Correction factor you use it matters that you always use the same one.

Novice dyno operators will get caught up in saying This power with this factor and that power with that factor and all it does is impose confusion.

If we are below a standard day, 60 degrees with dry air and above 29.92 baro we will see a the dyno correction Negative.

If we are above the standard day hot as hell high humidity low baro we will see the correction factor Positive.

The biggest problem I see is with Calibration and the quality of the sensors collecting the data that forms the correction factor.

Superflow uses Laboratory Grade Sensors in all of the data collection.

I purchased my Superflow in 2001 and it cost 64K because of the quality of both the hardware and the software.

Superflow is the industry standard that all dynos aspire to be.

Many Many Dynojet, Mustang, land and sea, dyno pack and other operators purchase Superflow software and hardware to upgrade and to more accurately run they're dynos.

Thank you for the kind words I hope this helps.

[ender2664]

Originally Posted by JANNETTYRACING

Typically testing procedures are not consistent with SAE standards.

I don't believe anyone is malicious but often will take low stock numbers and compare it to the best After numbers.

1 dyno pull against another.

I spend countless hours on Both Engine and Chassis dynomometers over the last 30 years and apply that experience to collect Real Accurate Repeatable Data.

For instance we have hundreds of factory stock dyno pulls on both auto and manual versions so we know for a fact what is real and what is skewed.

I hope this clears thing up for you and if not don't hesitate to ask.

Thank you

Ted.

So trust your numbers and no one else's because they are not being thorough?
You test any of the other intakes?
You test the vmax?
You don't happen to know if deleting the npp muffler nets any gains do you?

[JANNETTYRACING]

Originally Posted by ender2664

So trust your numbers and no one else's because they are not being thorough?
You test any of the other intakes?
You test the vmax?
You don't happen to know if deleting the npp muffler nets any gains do you?

Answers in order.

That is a decision you will have to make for your self.
Yes
Yes
We have not seen any gains by deleting an NPP