|
|
#29 | |
![]() Drives: 2016 Black 2SS - manual Join Date: Oct 2016
Location: Hanover park, il
Posts: 11
|
I noticed is most at part throttle around 2000-2300rpm.
at cruising speeds it's not bad at all Quote:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
#30 |
![]() |
I would love to believe... but I think there is some ****ery afoot
__________________
Kooks ceramic coated headers -1 7/8 in. x 3 in
Pray ported 95MM TB Pray ported MSD IM Rotofab CAI BTR 225 CAM PRC 312 CC Ported Heads Katech Oil Pump DSX Flex Fuel E-85 kit QTP exhaust cutouts Full JLAudio Stereo Build w/ 13-W6 |
|
|
|
|
|
#31 |
![]() Drives: 2017 Camaro SS Join Date: Aug 2016
Location: UK
Posts: 334
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
#32 |
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() Drives: 2017 Camaro 1SS Join Date: Aug 2016
Location: NH
Posts: 1,713
|
The torque numbers from that dyno are very strange for a stock LT1. The stock dyno sheets that I've seen are typically not more than a 2% difference, torque to hp, but this dyno reports about a 10% difference. I'm focusing on your stock pull here (401hp/441tq).
|
|
|
|
|
|
#33 | |
![]() Drives: BLUE CAMARO ZL1 1LE M6 Join Date: Jun 2009
Location: ON THE DYNO WATERBURY CT.
Posts: 15,453
|
Quote:
I have had many 2016 LT1 both auto and manual cars on my dyno, and have tested all kinds of parts and all different combinations see my test posts. It is obvious on your dyno graph you had an RPM signal problem on the dyno which would hugely change the torque calculation. A lower RPM signal reports more torque. If the before and after dyno testing was accurate you would see nearly Identical torque and HP curves starting and finishing at the same RPM. Sorry to rain on your parade. Ted.
__________________
www.jannettyracing.com
Celebrating 39 years Performance parts, Installation, Fabrication, Dyno tuning, Remote custom tuning, and alignments. 203-753-7223 Waterbury CT. 06705 email tedj@jannettyracing.com |
|
|
|
|
|
|
#34 |
|
Drives: 2016 2SS Camaro Join Date: Sep 2016
Location: Cumming, GA
Posts: 541
|
Agree with Ted ^^^
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Post Reply
|
|
|