|
|
#15 |
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() Drives: 18 Silverado 1500 Join Date: Dec 2015
Location: Bradenton, FL
Posts: 1,721
|
Just don't wander too much at cars and coffee events. We'd hate to see our cars get the Mustang reputation for running into crowds.
__________________
16 Red Hot 2SS A8: NPP, CAI Cold air, Ported TB, Fasterproms Ported intake, E85 flex, Formatto tuned. 11.80@118 with 1.92 60' (600-700 DA) on stock run flats.
|
|
|
|
|
|
#16 |
|
BL1ZZRD
Drives: '16 Camaro 2SS, '20 Equinox Redline Join Date: Jul 2009
Location: Buffalo, NY
Posts: 7,841
|
Some things never change! This was a very common problem with the 5th gens which required poly subframe bushings, aftermarket trailing arms, and poly outer trailing arm bushings to resolve. The subframe bushings helped with the tail wag and trailing arms helped reduce wheel hop. Sounds like similar mods might be needed with the 6th gen as well! I had to do this to my '10 SS when I had it!
|
|
|
|
|
|
#17 | |
![]() Drives: Camaro SS Join Date: May 2016
Location: East Bay, Ca
Posts: 301
|
Quote:
I've taken my car on closed courses and ripped pretty massive burnouts and hit the skid pad and done figure 8's - all with the traction control off - and this is not what I'm feeling. It feels like rear wheel torque steer or something. Sort of violent and sudden. It's unsettling to say the least. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
#18 | |
![]() Drives: Camaro SS Join Date: May 2016
Location: East Bay, Ca
Posts: 301
|
Quote:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
#19 | |
|
マスタング = 遅い
Drives: 2017 Chevrolet Camaro SS 1LE Join Date: Aug 2015
Location: Florida
Posts: 7,061
|
Quote:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
#20 | |
![]() ![]() ![]() Drives: Want a gen 6 Join Date: Jan 2013
Location: 75089
Posts: 1,032
|
Quote:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
#21 |
|
BL1ZZRD
Drives: '16 Camaro 2SS, '20 Equinox Redline Join Date: Jul 2009
Location: Buffalo, NY
Posts: 7,841
|
Here's one of many! http://www.camaro5.com/forums/showthread.php?t=293582
|
|
|
|
|
|
#22 |
![]() Drives: 2017 Camaro SS Join Date: Aug 2016
Location: UK
Posts: 334
|
I would take a look at the BMR rear end braces before poly bushes
|
|
|
|
|
|
#23 | |
![]() Drives: 2014 Cyclone mustang Join Date: Feb 2016
Location: Port Lavaca,Tx.
Posts: 355
|
Quote:
__________________
2014 Cyclone/Select Shift/"/Sold
2016 ruby red GT w/3.55:1/resonator delete X- pipe/UPR catch can/Airaid "tube"W/AEM/J&M/BigWorm/BMR /SVE /ZL1addons/Redline/Steeda/BG fluids/ |
|
|
|
|
|
|
#24 |
|
マスタング = 遅い
Drives: 2017 Chevrolet Camaro SS 1LE Join Date: Aug 2015
Location: Florida
Posts: 7,061
|
Hard to say yet, as the SS 1LE has many upgrades over the SS.
|
|
|
|
|
|
#25 | |
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() Drives: 2022 CT4-V Blackwing Join Date: Sep 2013
Location: Florida
Posts: 2,723
|
Quote:
__________________
2002 Corvette Z06 - Black - Sold
2013 Camaro SS 1LE - Black - M6 - Sold 2016 Camaro SS - Mosaic Black - A8 - Sold 2017 C7 Stingray - M7 Coupe - Sold 2019 C7 Grand Sport M7 Vert - Sold 2021 Camaro ZL1 - Black - A10 - Sold 2019 Tesla Model 3 2022 CT4-V Blackwing - M6 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
#26 | |
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() Drives: 2017 SS 1LE, 2016 1SS (previous) Join Date: Apr 2016
Location: Metro-Detroit
Posts: 1,871
|
Quote:
I can't comment on the bushing theory, and it's hard to help you without feeling what you're talking about, but I have felt something in the rear of my car, on track, that I would describe as "a numb responsiveness". On the street, I really don't notice much issue with my car but a lesser connectivity to the road in comparison to the front in respect to going over bumps and other road imperfections - I associate this to OE damper tuning (I'm not saying it is bad, just a less connected feeling than the front), but it could be the busings in the rear. In performance driving scenarios (autocross and track day), there is a numbness to what the rear end is doing in regards to weight transfer, but it is not anything extreme. Again, this is in respect to the front end (the front end of the 6th Gen Camaro is REALLY good). In autocross, specifically, I have noticed a difference in traction between the left and right tires. There seems to be a nibble of torque steer, but nothing bothersome - just something I noticed coming from a TrueTrac equipped car (TrueTrac is similar to a Torsen, for those not in the know). Personally, I just associated this to the clutch-type limited slip differential. I was just going to try using less friction modifier. I figured it could also be from the differing torsional forces on the rear axles, as I know one is slightly smaller diameter than the other (from what I read). |
|
|
|
|
|
|
#27 | |
![]() ![]() Drives: 2016 Camaro 2SS Join Date: Dec 2015
Location: Philadelphia
Posts: 771
|
Quote:
I have a 2SS with MRC and definitely felt a big difference from the rear suspension mods that I did. Although I did a lot at once, I think it's one of those things where each part only adds a little bit but they come together to make a drastic change. I bought all the available suspension arms with spherical ball joints, but now that I've been driving around on them for a while I think that might have been overkill for a mostly street driven car. I think the upper control arm and toe rod make sense with easy on-car adjustability and they're most responsible for keeping correct alignment under power and while loading the car up in a turn. The trailing arms I would get with poly bushings and no adjustablility, as there's absolutely no need to adjust these for street driving... even if you know what those adjustments do. The cradle lock out kit is pretty awesome, as it removes like 90% of the deflection while keeping the softer rubber - that really helps with NVH, anyone who drove a car with poly or delrin bushings knows the frequent vibration can be annoying. There's also two types of movement you get from the rear end... what I thought the OP and a few others were talking about is the flexing of all the components at the rear end under power - it feels sort of like you're breaking traction, but the movements are much smaller than the fishtailing you get in a full wheelspin situation. Breaking traction won't be fixed by upgrading the suspension (edit: it will help reduce wheel hop and keep better alignment, that in turn will provide better traction as the tires are touching the road instead of bouncing around or pointing into an incorrect direction... so there are traction benefits in some situations. I know people will point this out), better and wider tires will be of most help there. If all you care about is the fastest possible acceleration, your money would be better spent on Michelin PSSs. The suspension upgrade will really let you feel what those rear tires and chassis are doing in any situation - instead of the slightly hazy and float-y feeling the stock car has. Edit 2: less flex will also improve power delivery and response... as less power is wasted on compressing rubber bushings and flexing stamped suspension arms.
__________________
![]() Last edited by crankaholic; 10-31-2016 at 03:58 PM. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
#28 | |
![]() Drives: Camaro SS Join Date: May 2016
Location: East Bay, Ca
Posts: 301
|
Quote:
but it's also a daily driver. So I want it track capable without going overboard. I might call Pete at BMR and ask for his input - he seems like a solid, no BS kinda guy. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Post Reply
|
|
|