Homepage Garage Wiki Register Community Calendar Today's Posts Search
#Camaro6
Go Back   CAMARO6 > Engine | Drivetrain | Powertrain Technical Discussions > V8 LT1 Engine, Exhaust, and Bolt-Ons


AWE Tuning


Post Reply
 
Thread Tools
Old 03-14-2016, 05:42 AM   #43
Nataphen
 
Drives: None
Join Date: Feb 2016
Location: DFW TX
Posts: 304
I don't know what power level you guys are after, but a mild H/C combo with the MSD IM, E85, and headers would get you to ~150whp over stock, with usable power stretched out to 7500RPM. I'm talking about a cam that looses no low end torque, keeps some VVT range, and idles practically stock too. Since these cars seem to dyno in the 400whp range most of the time, there's 550whp NA right there. That's the route I'm going. Forced induction just isn't my thing anymore.
Nataphen is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 03-14-2016, 09:31 AM   #44
TSloper

 
Drives: 2016 Camaro SS
Join Date: Jan 2016
Location: Mount Dora, FL
Posts: 779
That path is an option as well for sure. It has the advantage of not adding any weight. I think 150 RWHP would be a perfect jump. Higher numbers look cool but are useless anywhere but the track.
TSloper is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 03-14-2016, 09:38 AM   #45
Nataphen
 
Drives: None
Join Date: Feb 2016
Location: DFW TX
Posts: 304
MSD intake manifold data (stock engine)

That's exactly the way I think. The power stays linear, there's not as much heat under the hood, and it's more suitable for road racing. 550whp would be a blast on the street anyway. Anything more, and you'd probably never get any traction below 60MPH. Here's the setup I'm looking at. This is Katech's stage 2 heads/cam, MSD IM, 93 octane tune, and completely stock exhaust on a C7.



Add headers and E85, and I'd say another 40-50whp would be very likely. That would also bring the slight torque loss back to at least stock levels, so the slight low end penalty of the cam would be no issue any longer.
Nataphen is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 03-14-2016, 10:04 AM   #46
TSloper

 
Drives: 2016 Camaro SS
Join Date: Jan 2016
Location: Mount Dora, FL
Posts: 779
That's not bad at all! On the street that would be an excellent setup.

Tim
TSloper is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 03-14-2016, 10:29 AM   #47
Nataphen
 
Drives: None
Join Date: Feb 2016
Location: DFW TX
Posts: 304
MSD intake manifold data (stock engine)

https://youtu.be/W48VwhD9qXY

Here's that cam at idle. It has a very slight lope to it, but still very streetable. The MSD IM on this setup was worth over 30whp I think. It makes a bigger difference the higher in the RPM range the motor can pull.

EDIT: found Katech's MSD IM test. 36whp!

Nataphen is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 03-14-2016, 10:45 AM   #48
LesBaer
FMPG
 
LesBaer's Avatar
 
Drives: 2016 2SS
Join Date: Dec 2015
Location: CT
Posts: 1,888
Anyone who's worried about keeping the stock engine cover should just stop reading. That thing is going in the trash bin with or without any mods on day 1. If you think that it's going to save your warranty claim, I'm sorry, it won't LOL. Really, I mean no disrespect, but why bother touching anything if you're worried about your warranty? If you have a major problem, I would expect to face resistance from even the slightest modification. You really just have to ask yourself if modding the car at all for extra performance is it worth it to you. It's not an easy decision, especially considering resale, with the hassle of returning to stock once the mods pile up. Otherwise you're going to drive yourself crazy being held hostage by a warranty.

The MSD units and a cam swap have proven their worth elsewhere with this same engine. Thanks for sharing this. I'm definitely getting these and a tune once I'm past the break in period and I have confidence in my car. They're not the prettiest IM's out there but they're worth every penny based on this data and what I've heard about them. If you can change a throttle body, you can do this yourself - just don't over tighten it or you'll strip it and ruin it.

My list just keeps growing and growing. I'm at the point now where I'm starting to evaluate the cost of doing everything at once with a known performance shop (LPE) vs. piece by piece / going local.
__________________
Ordered 3/8/16- NFG/Ceramic White, M6, MRC, NPP, 6 pots, blk blade, no sunroof, blk splitter, blk bow ties, dark tails, nav.
ARH 1 7/8" ceramic coated full sys w/NPP; Maggie 9.2psi (85mm); Jannetty rough idle cam(TSP), tune and LT4 fuel system; Forgeline VX1 Black PVD (20x10,11); R88R 315's; ALPriority; BMR rear arms, bushings, DS loop; RF intake (red); nGauge

93 octane: 712rwhp, 654rwtq / E85 (E66 mix): 734rwhp, 674rwtq (SuperFlow Dyno)
LesBaer is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 03-14-2016, 11:09 AM   #49
Nataphen
 
Drives: None
Join Date: Feb 2016
Location: DFW TX
Posts: 304
I don't like the stock gray cover much, but I don't like the look of the MSD IM lettering. I think the letters being painted black and reinstalling the side covers probably looks the best to me. Warranty isn't my concern. I'll get all the bolt-ons and exhaust done, then start planning out the cam swap.
Nataphen is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 03-14-2016, 11:22 AM   #50
LesBaer
FMPG
 
LesBaer's Avatar
 
Drives: 2016 2SS
Join Date: Dec 2015
Location: CT
Posts: 1,888
I agree. Someone will come out with some nice half covers in carbon fiber I'm sure that will look great.
__________________
Ordered 3/8/16- NFG/Ceramic White, M6, MRC, NPP, 6 pots, blk blade, no sunroof, blk splitter, blk bow ties, dark tails, nav.
ARH 1 7/8" ceramic coated full sys w/NPP; Maggie 9.2psi (85mm); Jannetty rough idle cam(TSP), tune and LT4 fuel system; Forgeline VX1 Black PVD (20x10,11); R88R 315's; ALPriority; BMR rear arms, bushings, DS loop; RF intake (red); nGauge

93 octane: 712rwhp, 654rwtq / E85 (E66 mix): 734rwhp, 674rwtq (SuperFlow Dyno)
LesBaer is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 03-14-2016, 01:51 PM   #51
oldman


 
Drives: SS 6 speed of course
Join Date: Jan 2016
Location: Hilo, HI
Posts: 4,346
500 WHP from top end work and a tune, oh my oh my, can we say complete LT1 dominance from street to strip. Especially in a lighter stronger package with bigger tires. Yep a win in every column.

Look how flat the torque curve is, and to add icing on the cake look how flat the HP curve is at the top. 7000 RPM baby.
__________________
Forged short block, large duration sub .600 lift Cam Motion cam, 7200 RPM fuel cut, Pray Ported Heads, 3.85 pulley D1X, stage II intercooler, DSX secondary low side, DSX E85 sensor, Lingenfelter big bore 2.0 pump, ported front cats, 60608 Borla, LT4 injectors, ZL1 1LE driveshaft and Katech ported TB, ported MSD intake, BTR valvetrain, ARP studs, ProFlow valves, PS4 tires.
oldman is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 10-25-2016, 07:46 AM   #52
Turbo8u
Motorhead
 
Drives: 2016 Camaro Convertible 2SS
Join Date: Jun 2016
Location: Lawrenceville, GA
Posts: 69
__________________
Cars in the stable right now.
2016 Camaro SS Convertible Nighfall
2013 Dodge Charger SRT8
2002 Chevrolet Quad Cab Duramax
2012 Jeep Wrangler Rubicon BUILT, Supercharged
1969 Camaro FAKE Z28
1968 Ford Bronco Rockcrawler
Turbo8u is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 10-25-2016, 09:30 AM   #53
Megahurtz
Snackbar Tuning
 
Megahurtz's Avatar
 
Drives: 2023 SGM ZL1
Join Date: Oct 2016
Location: Florida
Posts: 1,522
Strangely enough I am wondering about Fuel Economy with the MSD intake manifold. It's not a deal breaker for me but I am going to be more cautious how I modify my 2017 SS. I previously owned a heavily modded 2011 Z06 and man fuel mileage was a bit rough for a daily driver.

TSloper, how has your fuel economy been with your mods? (Excluding E85)
Megahurtz is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 10-25-2016, 09:35 AM   #54
TSloper

 
Drives: 2016 Camaro SS
Join Date: Jan 2016
Location: Mount Dora, FL
Posts: 779
My only mechanical mods have been front cat delete pipe and Rotofab. No appreciable change. E85 of course drops it but at only $1.65 a gallon it's easy to deal with.

MSD won't affect mileage in any real way. It's a closed loop system while cruising and the flow difference just aren't going to be a major factor at part throttle.
TSloper is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 10-25-2016, 10:44 AM   #55
Megahurtz
Snackbar Tuning
 
Megahurtz's Avatar
 
Drives: 2023 SGM ZL1
Join Date: Oct 2016
Location: Florida
Posts: 1,522
Quote:
Originally Posted by TSloper View Post
My only mechanical mods have been front cat delete pipe and Rotofab. No appreciable change. E85 of course drops it but at only $1.65 a gallon it's easy to deal with.

MSD won't affect mileage in any real way. It's a closed loop system while cruising and the flow difference just aren't going to be a major factor at part throttle.
Did you keep the MSd intake?

My mods path is going to pretty much be the same as yours. E85, Rotofab, Primary Cat Deletes, MSD Intake. All self tuned via HP Tuners. I want the car to stay quiet and get good gas mileage. Thanks for sharing all your experiences with us.
Megahurtz is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 10-25-2016, 10:45 AM   #56
TSloper

 
Drives: 2016 Camaro SS
Join Date: Jan 2016
Location: Mount Dora, FL
Posts: 779
I will be returning to the MSD after I do headers.
TSloper is offline   Reply With Quote
 
Post Reply


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump


All times are GMT -5. The time now is 09:44 AM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.9 Beta 4
Copyright ©2000 - 2026, vBulletin Solutions, Inc.