|
|
#1 |
![]() Drives: 2016 Camaro 2SS Join Date: Mar 2016
Location: Boulder, CO
Posts: 19
|
Warranty affected by K&N Performance Intake ?
I'm getting ready to order the K&N Performance Intake kit 63-3092 for my 16SS and i was wondering if the aftermarket installation will void the manufactures warranty? please advise, Thanks guys
|
|
|
|
|
#2 |
![]() ![]() Drives: 2016 Camaro SS Join Date: Jan 2016
Location: Mount Dora, FL
Posts: 779
|
Cancel the order and go with the Rotofab.
Take it off before dealer visits if you are going in with powertrain issues. |
|
|
|
|
#3 |
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
^listen to this guy
K&N is unproven junk. Tim (TSloper) is our resident tuning expert and has personally tested the Rotofab unit. If he recommends it, you want it.
__________________
Current: '17 2SS Hyper Blue, A8, MRC, NPP
Past: '99 SS Camaro A4, '73 Camaro 383 A3 "Voices in your head are not considered insider information." 3800 Status - 6/16/16 (Built!) 6000 status - 6/29/16 (Delivered!) |
|
|
|
|
#4 |
![]() Drives: 2016 Camaro SS Join Date: Apr 2016
Location: Utah
Posts: 713
|
I concur with the above. The K&N would be near the bottom of the list when shopping for a CAI. You can leave it on for routine maintenance, but as mentioned, if there's anything engine related, you'll probably be better off if you reinstall the stock airbox.
__________________
16 2SS 6MT NPP White | MRR | ACT | JBA | SCT | C7C
04 Ram 2500 CDT 4x4 Quad 91 Miata 1.8 Feal Wilwood Track Car 1morproject |
|
|
|
|
#5 |
![]() Drives: 2016 Camaro 2SS Join Date: Mar 2016
Location: Boulder, CO
Posts: 19
|
interesting to hear the remarks about K&N intakes. Is there some unbiased reviews out there with factual data ? I don't mean to discredit options, but every fabrication /manufacture has their claims as to why their product is superior. Thanks again guys
|
|
|
|
|
#6 | |
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
Quote:
__________________
Current: '17 2SS Hyper Blue, A8, MRC, NPP
Past: '99 SS Camaro A4, '73 Camaro 383 A3 "Voices in your head are not considered insider information." 3800 Status - 6/16/16 (Built!) 6000 status - 6/29/16 (Delivered!) |
|
|
|
|
|
#7 | |
![]() ![]() Drives: 2016 Camaro SS Join Date: Jan 2016
Location: Mount Dora, FL
Posts: 779
|
Quote:
If you feel compelled to burn new ground it's your choice but just looking at the photos of the K&N it is already inferior. Rotofab has been out for a while. It sounds like the website needs an update. |
|
|
|
|
|
#8 | |
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
Quote:
https://www.roto-fab.com/2016-17-cam...-intake-system FYI: You should browse the LT1 section http://www.camaro6.com/forums/forumdisplay.php?f=231
__________________
Current: '17 2SS Hyper Blue, A8, MRC, NPP
Past: '99 SS Camaro A4, '73 Camaro 383 A3 "Voices in your head are not considered insider information." 3800 Status - 6/16/16 (Built!) 6000 status - 6/29/16 (Delivered!) |
|
|
|
|
|
#9 | |
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() Drives: 2016 Camaro 1LT Join Date: Jan 2016
Location: California
Posts: 3,514
|
Quote:
I suspect that all of these will produce little if any benefit over the stock intake with a drop-in high flow filter once the ECU has adapted to the change. These days with NA engines, CAI's are less for power and more for sound and looks since the stock intake is already a CAI. |
|
|
|
|
|
#10 | |
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
Quote:
__________________
Current: '17 2SS Hyper Blue, A8, MRC, NPP
Past: '99 SS Camaro A4, '73 Camaro 383 A3 "Voices in your head are not considered insider information." 3800 Status - 6/16/16 (Built!) 6000 status - 6/29/16 (Delivered!) |
|
|
|
|
|
#11 |
![]() Drives: 2016 Camaro 2SS Join Date: Mar 2016
Location: Boulder, CO
Posts: 19
|
Supersound, that thread on the Rotofab CIA ended up with no HP or Torque gained Dyno results??
|
|
|
|
|
#12 |
![]() Drives: 2016 Camaro 2SS Join Date: Mar 2016
Location: Boulder, CO
Posts: 19
|
sorry guy's , I'm kind of new and just data mining this group. thanks everyone, i really appreciate your thoughts
|
|
|
|
|
#13 |
![]() ![]() Drives: 2016 Camaro SS Join Date: Jan 2016
Location: Mount Dora, FL
Posts: 779
|
I've said from day one that I don't expect much from a CAI on a stock engine. And I still have that mentality. On a modified setup there will be without a doubt a benefit. The more significant the mods there greater delta you will see between stock and the aftermarket CAI.
My only concern on this thread is keeping someone from make an unwise purchase for technical reasons. Rotofab does not screw up the tuning nor will it hold you back if and when you start modding. |
|
|
|
|
#14 |
![]() Drives: 2016 Camaro 2SS Join Date: Mar 2016
Location: Boulder, CO
Posts: 19
|
I previewed the Rotofab 2016SS product on their website and could not find any dyno data ? Is their any manufacture published data available -vs- stock intake? thanks again
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Closed Thread
|
|
|