You are browsing camaro6 
06-07-2016, 08:28 PM
|
#1 |
|
Account Suspended
Drives: 2016 2SS Join Date: Mar 2014
Location: Palm Desert
Posts: 2,353
|
Car and Driver 2.0T review
The last sentence of the Car and Driver article is beautiful!
|
|
|
|
06-07-2016, 08:40 PM
|
#2 |
     
Drives: Gen 6 Camaro RS Join Date: Dec 2015
Location: Miami FL
Posts: 1,725
|
Beautiful? Turbo-4 engine Camaro owners are going to be MAD!
|
|
|
|
|
06-07-2016, 08:55 PM
|
#3 | |
|
Account Suspended
Drives: 2016 2SS Join Date: Mar 2014
Location: Palm Desert
Posts: 2,353
|
Quote:
Had a mini van in college, took it pretty hard on the chin for that one too. |
|
|
|
|
|
06-07-2016, 09:10 PM
|
#4 | |
Drives: 2016 Camaro 1LT Join Date: Apr 2016
Location: Topeka KS
Posts: 892
|
Quote:
__________________
 Life after retirement |
|
|
|
|
|
06-07-2016, 09:14 PM
|
#5 |
|
Camaro6 2016-2018
Drives: sometimes Join Date: Mar 2008
Location: Phoenix
Posts: 18,469
|
i just read that review.
|
|
|
|
|
06-07-2016, 09:32 PM
|
#6 |
|
Drives: 2002 Z/28,1968 Chevelle convert. Join Date: Oct 2010
Location: Phila.,PA
Posts: 1,137
|
That's a rough last sentence review ............ yikes !
|
|
|
|
|
06-07-2016, 09:38 PM
|
#7 |
  
Drives: 2016 F150 Join Date: May 2014
Location: Iowa
Posts: 2,196
|
That's kind of funny.. So, what did the review say overall? Positives? Any? Negatives?
I drove an ATS with the 2.0 and I thought that was pretty good.. |
|
|
|
|
06-07-2016, 10:17 PM
|
#8 | |
|
Account Suspended
Drives: 2016 2SS Join Date: Mar 2014
Location: Palm Desert
Posts: 2,353
|
Quote:
|
|
|
|
|
|
06-07-2016, 11:03 PM
|
#9 |
 
|
Yeah who cares. I drove a ATS with the 2.0 and was ready to buy one before I got my 2SS and it was a quick car and handled great. Could've sounded better but it's a luxury car. I'm sure the Camaro with the 2.0 is better. Motor Trend seems to think so. All it needs is a set a summer tires. it's crazy chevy doesn't offer them as an option.
__________________
Camaro 2SS
Hyper Blue Metallic/Kalahari 6M, NPP, MRC, NAV Black 5 Spoke |
|
|
|
|
06-08-2016, 01:35 AM
|
#10 |
|
The issue is they have a great V6 and awesome V8 to compare it to. The article was more focused on a comparison of the options within the Camaro family NOT a comparison against other cars. The 2.0T can be a 'good' option, but when compared to the two other options, it fell short for them.
They did not mention anything about the tuning options which I believe is one of the big reasons to buy it. It was in the back of the magazine, and I don't take it as a slam on the car - just their opinion of the three current engine options - and their least favorite was the 2.0T. Big deal...
__________________
|
|
|
|
|
06-08-2016, 12:48 PM
|
#11 | |
 
Drives: 2017 Camaro 1SS, for go, not show. Join Date: Aug 2014
Location: Pearland, Texas, United States
Posts: 426
|
And then there's this:
http://www.motortrend.com/news/1500-...pr=18332466311 Quote:
__________________
 Camaro/Firebird fan since 1977! Previous rides: 1965 Pontiac GTO, 1977 Trans Am Special Ed. "Bandit", 1996 Camaro 3.8, 2002 Camaro Z28, 2014 Camaro 2SS/RS M6 Spring Special Edition Current ride: "SOUTHERNCROSS" - 2017 Camaro 1SS Silver Ice Metallic/Jet Black w/BO4 56V RZ9 NPP SFE SH1 VW9 W2D "And no BS! It's (the 1SS) everything you need and nothing you don't." -Craig Cole on the 1SS vs 2SS "Reach above your dreams of pleasure, giving life to those who died. Look beyond your own horizons, sail the ship of signs." -RJD 'The Sign of the Southern Cross' |
|
|
|
|
|
06-08-2016, 12:53 PM
|
#12 |
Drives: 2015 2SS/RS/1LE Join Date: Feb 2016
Location: NW Arkansas
Posts: 334
|
If I was going to buy a turbo 4 I would buy a WRX. I had a 2015 WRX before my 1LE and it was a great car. It had the new boxer FA 2.0, was lighter than the Camaro and had better visibility, more interior and trunk room, all wheel drive and 4 doors.
|
|
|
|
|
06-08-2016, 01:00 PM
|
#13 | |
|
Account Suspended
Drives: 2016 2SS Join Date: Mar 2014
Location: Palm Desert
Posts: 2,353
|
Quote:
|
|
|
|
|
|
06-08-2016, 01:01 PM
|
#14 |
|
FMPG
Drives: 2016 2SS Join Date: Dec 2015
Location: CT
Posts: 1,888
|
I think they're right. Hell, I wouldn't tell anyone I was even considering a V6 Camaro let alone a 4 cylinder...it's worse than a rental car LOL
__________________
Ordered 3/8/16- NFG/Ceramic White, M6, MRC, NPP, 6 pots, blk blade, no sunroof, blk splitter, blk bow ties, dark tails, nav.
ARH 1 7/8" ceramic coated full sys w/NPP; Maggie 9.2psi (85mm); Jannetty rough idle cam(TSP), tune and LT4 fuel system; Forgeline VX1 Black PVD (20x10,11); R88R 315's; ALPriority; BMR rear arms, bushings, DS loop; RF intake (red); nGauge  93 octane: 712rwhp, 654rwtq / E85 (E66 mix): 734rwhp, 674rwtq (SuperFlow Dyno) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Post Reply
|
|
|
