|
|
#29 |
|
davet
Drives: 2016 2SS Mosaic Black Join Date: Apr 2010
Location: Arlington Texas
Posts: 854
|
My opinion exactly!!
__________________
Replacement car ordered 2/02/2016
2/03/16 2500 2/04/16 3000 no TPW 2/8/16 3000 TPW 2/29 2/18/16 3400 3/3/16 3800 3/4/16 4B00 3/5/16 4300 3/7/16 4200!!! |
|
|
|
|
|
#30 | |
![]() Drives: 2016 Garnet Red 2SS 6 Spd Join Date: Jan 2016
Location: Oralndo, FL
Posts: 23
|
Quote:
Installed this morning with no issues at all in about an hour and fifteen. I go slow and methodical. This intake to me initially seemed expensive, but once I received the product and saw the quality, I think the price is well justified. The one thing they don't prepare you for is the windows losing their programming, after you reconnect the battery. Reprogramming is easy though. After reconnecting the battery and starting the car, when prompted on your center display, you fully open, then close each window 2 to 3 times, and that's it. Performance: As Lethalhammer on youtube stated, "it takes the car a few minutes after first start up for the ECU to recalibrate itself". Now you can really hear the engine sucking in all that air, especially with the hood up. I have not dyno'ed my 2SS manual or taken it to the strip yet, but have many years of experience doing both. The "seat of the pants" meter says "Wow". If I were to guess the forward gees probably went up a tenth or two. ![]() It not only feels stronger, but the sound just got, at full throttle, a lot loader and deeper toned. Very cool! Now I want to see what GM does with getting a good tune in production.
__________________
FlyTrap•Orlando, FL
2016 Garnet Red 2SS 6spd•NPP•Cold Air Inductions CAI Sun Roof•MRC•Adrenaline Red•Split 5 Spoke Gun Metal Last edited by FlyTrap; 03-26-2016 at 03:34 PM. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
#31 |
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() Drives: 2016 Camaro 1LT Join Date: Jan 2016
Location: California
Posts: 3,514
|
They always tell you to disconnect the battery basically for every little thing that has to do with an electrical device being unplugged or plugged in. I've disconnected the maf and connected it a bunch of times and it's fine. It's not getting power anyway when the car is off.
|
|
|
|
|
|
#32 |
![]() |
Mishimoto was about 14hp and 14 lb/tq. Air to fuel was lean, but no tune required. Ordered mine a few days ago.
|
|
|
|
|
|
#33 | |
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() Drives: 18 Silverado 1500 Join Date: Dec 2015
Location: Bradenton, FL
Posts: 1,721
|
Quote:
__________________
16 Red Hot 2SS A8: NPP, CAI Cold air, Ported TB, Fasterproms Ported intake, E85 flex, Formatto tuned. 11.80@118 with 1.92 60' (600-700 DA) on stock run flats.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
#34 |
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() Drives: 18 Silverado 1500 Join Date: Dec 2015
Location: Bradenton, FL
Posts: 1,721
|
I just had my tuner look at my car yesterday with the CAI. He also agreed that no adjustment to my tune was necessary. I struggled with the choice between Mishimoto and CAI, but ultimately decided to go with CAI because I had used them before and was impressed by the quality.
__________________
16 Red Hot 2SS A8: NPP, CAI Cold air, Ported TB, Fasterproms Ported intake, E85 flex, Formatto tuned. 11.80@118 with 1.92 60' (600-700 DA) on stock run flats.
|
|
|
|
|
|
#35 | |
![]() |
Quote:
I've loved my Mishimoto CAI. Especially with more torque in the lower rpms. The sound is wonderful too. It's all each persons opinion I believe. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
#36 |
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() Drives: 2016 Camaro 1LT Join Date: Jan 2016
Location: California
Posts: 3,514
|
I've unplugged everything attached to the intake with no codes thrown and no issues.
Some things get power all the time and some don't. The diy instructions simply err on the side of caution. It isn't necessary to disconnect the battery for maf or throttle body if car is off. |
|
|
|
|
|
#37 |
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
So far, no aftermarket CAI has independently proven much or no power increase. The Chevy CAI is a rebranded aftermarket part. It is a good quality part and it may help you if you add more power mods. Otherwise, it does sound and look nice and hopefully you have one that lets you remove that awful sound tube.
Chevy did a good job with the standard intake, much like Ford did with the 5.0 Coyote.
__________________
"Democracy Dies in Darkness" |
|
|
|
|
|
#38 |
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() Drives: 2016 2SS Convertible Join Date: May 2012
Location: St. Louis, MO
Posts: 1,759
|
I saw the performance intake mentioned again in the Chevy SEMA video. Let's hope Chevy can finally bring this to market for those that are interested in it.
|
|
|
|
|
|
#39 |
|
Drives: 2010 SS/RS Supercharged 427 Build Join Date: Nov 2010
Location: Michigan
Posts: 5,503
|
Quote:
|
|
|
|
|
|
#40 |
|
Pull up Cougar!
Drives: 2016 2SS Join Date: Jul 2011
Location: San Diego
Posts: 2,875
|
It would be nice if the GM one was 50 state legal. I don't expect CAI inc to throw money at our dumb state for Carb approval but GM could afford it.
|
|
|
|
|
|
#41 |
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() Drives: 2016 2SS Convertible Join Date: May 2012
Location: St. Louis, MO
Posts: 1,759
|
The LT1 intake is listed in the 2017 catalog with a new part number 84242093. The bad news is that it is listed as not legal in California. Hopefully they are working on the CARB certification and can sell in California soon.
|
|
|
|
|
|
#42 |
|
Drives: 2017 1SS Join Date: Aug 2016
Location: Wauconda, IL
Posts: 164
|
They will be releasing a LT1 California State Legal Intake as well.
Most current Part numbers I have are 2.0T - 84242613 3.6 - 84242620 LT1 - 23408280 ( North America Market ) 84162081 & 84242093 ( Non CA Emissions) 84073383 ( CA Emissions) I've been refreshing numbers hourly each day until they release them. They usually change part numbers several times before the actual release. The LTG, LGX, and LT1 just did a # change about 2 weeks ago. Prices are fluctuating but from what I've seen price range online will be around $400-475 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Post Reply
|
|
|