|
|
#15 | |
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() Drives: 2016 Camaro 1LT M6 Join Date: Aug 2008
Location: Evansville, IN
Posts: 1,256
|
Quote:
Just giving you a hard time. FBO wont gain much on the LT1. The exhaust is rather decent for the car so the days of gaining 20-30 at the wheels with exhaust are done. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
#16 |
![]() Drives: None Join Date: Feb 2016
Location: DFW TX
Posts: 304
|
First full bolt on SS?
50whp with FBO and 93 octane and 60-70whp with E85 seems to be about the norm for C7s. It would probably be a bit less for the Camaro since it has better stock headers. The MSD IM may get you really close.
|
|
|
|
|
|
#17 |
![]() Drives: 2016 camaro 1ss Join Date: Jan 2016
Location: virginia
Posts: 92
|
That's the plan!
If worming can tell me how to flip my picture that would be cool too
__________________
2016 1SS (M6) Kooks headers and exhaust, pray ported MSD/TB, JLT CAI, JLT catch can, TSP heads/VVT-2 cam, E85, Centerfirce clutch, g force axels and DS, most of what BMR makes, blah blah blah
|
|
|
|
|
|
#18 | |
![]() Drives: 1987 Z28, 385cid, '16 Camaro 1SS Join Date: Feb 2016
Location: Maryland
Posts: 523
|
Quote:
Funny considering I've personally seen a C7 stingray with atomic intake, TB, headers, exhaust and tune and it increased 63rwhp. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
#19 |
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() Drives: 2022 F150, 87 Monte Carlo Join Date: Mar 2015
Location: MN
Posts: 1,267
|
Time for a poll!
I'm guessing 462whp, which would give you low 11 with a good 60' I would think. Pretty nuts for a bolt on, stock stall car. |
|
|
|
|
|
#20 |
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() Drives: 2SS 1LE Join Date: Aug 2013
Location: US
Posts: 3,786
|
is e85 considered a bolt-on these days? if so its do-able. nice
|
|
|
|
|
|
#21 |
|
Lethal Camaro
Drives: 16 2SS, 71 Std, Suburban RTS Join Date: Jun 2013
Location: Temecula, CA
Posts: 3,855
|
With....
- Cold Air Intake - Ported Throttle Body - New Intake Manifold - Headers - XPipe - Mufflers - 93+ octane Is maybe 85hp being generous for this car. Might get close if you find a happy dyno that shows these cars at 420hp stock to the wheels.
__________________
|
|
|
|
|
|
#22 |
![]() Drives: 15 Silverado, 15 Corvette 2LT Z51 Join Date: Aug 2012
Location: Las Vegas
Posts: 360
|
You'll hit 450 to the rear roughly.
I've got the same set up. About to order the cam and parts necessary to redo the heads Currently on it. American Racing Headers (don't over night them lol) MSD Atomic airforce intake manifold CAI (make shift for now) Ported TB Tune (file needed isn't available yet and has to be done the old fashioned way) Makes 452 If I remember right and that was on a Mustang Dyno
__________________
2016 Camaro 2SS Mosiac Black Aka-The Reaper
Build Thread- http://www.camaro6.com/forums/showthread.php?t=440437 |
|
|
|
|
|
#23 |
![]() Drives: None Join Date: Feb 2016
Location: DFW TX
Posts: 304
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
#24 |
![]() Drives: 2016 Camaro 2SS Join Date: Jan 2016
Location: KCMO
Posts: 226
|
Bolt ons and cams will get you 5 hundo at the wheels.
|
|
|
|
|
|
#25 |
![]() Drives: None Join Date: Feb 2016
Location: DFW TX
Posts: 304
|
First full bolt on SS?
The right cam with supporting parts will easily get over 100whp gain at peak. The problem with changing to a cam with more aggressive overlap and duration, thus limiting or eliminating your VVT range, is that you lose a noticeable amount of low and mid range power. |
|
|
|
|
|
#26 |
|
Drives: Chevys at the limit Join Date: Nov 2010
Location: SLC, UT
Posts: 9,621
|
Cammed, I think 500 will be feasible. Guess we'll see.....
All the best, Jared Royce 801.545.4215 |
|
|
|
|
|
#27 | |
![]() Drives: None Join Date: Feb 2016
Location: DFW TX
Posts: 304
|
First full bolt on SS?
Quote:
That's all pretty good info, but a baseline is still needed. Dynos, whether DJ or MD, can read all over the place. The gains before and after are the numbers that matter, not numbers from a single setup. My stock tune 5.0 dynoed ~365 on a Mustang Dyno with a catless x pipe only. I've seen people post stock dynos from those cars all the way up to 400whp+. That doesn't mean that my car was down 30-40whp from other 5.0s, it just means that the dynos, conditions, tire loads, and probably a ton of other factors varied. For example, a 2016 SS M6 made a pull at that same shop with some bolt-ons and 91 octane, and he made under 370whp. So, if he made some changes and made another pull to 450whp on that dyno, that would be a ton of power gained! |
|
|
|
|
|
|
#28 |
![]() Drives: 15 Silverado, 15 Corvette 2LT Z51 Join Date: Aug 2012
Location: Las Vegas
Posts: 360
|
I'll have to go get another pull done to show the final numbers. I never grabbed a copy of the final pull, son was being a little impatient when I went to pick my car up
What do you mean by stock baseline? As in the stock dyno sheet? If so it's posted in the members car section
__________________
2016 Camaro 2SS Mosiac Black Aka-The Reaper
Build Thread- http://www.camaro6.com/forums/showthread.php?t=440437 Last edited by AlwaysAmerican; 02-29-2016 at 09:58 PM. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Post Reply
|
|
|