Homepage Garage Wiki Register Community Calendar Today's Posts Search
#Camaro6
Go Back   CAMARO6 > CAMARO6.com General Forums > 2016+ Camaro: 6th Gen Camaro general forum


BeckyD @ James Martin Chevy


Post Reply
 
Thread Tools
Old 11-15-2015, 06:48 PM   #29
ThePredator
 
Drives: camaro LT rs 2013
Join Date: Nov 2015
Location: katy,tx
Posts: 106
Quote:
Originally Posted by ILBMF View Post
Jeeez! Now here comes the information.
I wish Camaros were priced similar to Mustang but the Camaro is such a beautiful car that Iddon'tcar that mustang is cheaper.
ThePredator is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 11-15-2015, 07:21 PM   #30
NASTY99Z28

 
Drives: 99z28 with bolt-ons and a mwc fab 9
Join Date: Jul 2012
Location: Florida
Posts: 1,277
Can't go wrong with either car. Camaro is quicker but the stang is a few g's cheaper. Both are great cars to leave stock or mod. Good luck and keep us posted.
__________________
I like my woman like my milk shakes, THICK!!!!
NASTY99Z28 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 11-15-2015, 07:30 PM   #31
ILBMF
 
Drives: 2011 Camaro SS '06 Mustang GT
Join Date: Nov 2015
Location: Maryland
Posts: 64
I'll just have to drive a new SS and I'm sure my gut will tell me.
ILBMF is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 11-15-2015, 07:53 PM   #32
WHAMMO


 
WHAMMO's Avatar
 
Drives: 13' 1LE
Join Date: Apr 2012
Location: Canada
Posts: 2,653
You should get what you like most, which seems to be the Mustang, unless a Camaro test drive change your mind.

You talked about CAI exhaust and tune, which indicates your a performance type guy. I would chose the Camaro for this reason alone.
__________________
13' 1LE

Old setup: TSP 231-236/Tick 660/.105 PR, UDP, SW LT 2'' & HFC, stock NPP & H pipe, VR-DRX CAI, air scoop, Goertz1 manifold, 102mm BBK, 26" Toyo DRs, Forgestars R17x10 & F18x8, rear seat delete, remote Pat G tune Autocal, 7400 limiter, Spec Mini Twin. 91oct. 11.90@122.3, 0-60ft 2.0 / 11.99@123.6, 0-60ft 2.1 DA+819 ...519RWHP SAE

Solid roller SBE LS3, FED, LLSR, 91oct, 605rwhp N/A. Tuned by Pat G. Build by me.
WHAMMO is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 11-15-2015, 08:02 PM   #33
ILBMF
 
Drives: 2011 Camaro SS '06 Mustang GT
Join Date: Nov 2015
Location: Maryland
Posts: 64
My '06 has a built, blown stroker motor which I built myself. It has a host of suspension mods, built rear end, twin disc and the '11 has CAI, exhaust, tune and that's pretty much it other than drag radials. Probably going to sell the '11 because I'll probably never drive it with a new addition.
ILBMF is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 11-15-2015, 09:16 PM   #34
Chad0311
Likes V8 powered vehicles
 
Chad0311's Avatar
 
Drives: '16 Chevy Colorado Z71 Duramax
Join Date: Aug 2015
Location: NC (formerly CA)
Posts: 305
I think they are both great cars. I came close to getting a GT PP when they were doing 0% for 72 months with rebates a few months back.

I can say this, although it drove nicely on my test drive, the MT86 trans has a lot of documented issues, and this is true for the 15+ models as well. It really should always come down to what you like more, but if you want a winner the camaro is the one to buy. Of course, you'll have to wait to get your hands on one but it really shouldn't be much longer anyways.

I'm on the fence between a camaro and a scatpack challenger personally. To me it's all about what you like the most so when I drive the '16 SS I'll have driven all 3 and can confidently choose. The Mustang is an awesome car, having trouble picking is a great problem to have
Chad0311 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 11-15-2015, 10:07 PM   #35
ChocoTaco369
145lb Powerlifter
 
ChocoTaco369's Avatar
 
Drives: 2013 Camaro 2SS RS LS3
Join Date: Jan 2014
Location: Conshohocken, PA
Posts: 1,146
Quote:
Originally Posted by Whis View Post
If you want a new car by the end of the year, get the GT. Otherwise if you are willing to wait, deal with a terrible tracking system and third party logistics, and receive your car sometime next year... get the SS.
I more or less agree with this statement.

Looks are subjective, I get that. If we assume for a second that you don't care either way for looks, the current GT is probably superior to the current SS - simply because the new 6th Gen Mustang is fully updated and the current SS is dated. The interior and ride quality of the GT are probably superior, and the performance is negligible between them both. The Mustang is just more updated right this second.

I would suggest holding out 6 months and waiting for the 6th Gen, which handily trounces the Mustang in terms of performance, and you'll see major interior upgrades.

The biggest downside of the Mustang is that POS Getrag transmission. The TR6060 is so much better. Some people complain about the TR6060's feel...it certainly has its own personality and can be a notchbox in the winter until it's warmed up...but it is so much stronger. I don't like the term "bulletproof," but it is much, much stronger than the Getrag. Swapping to Redline D4 fluid has helped its smoothness in the cold a lot.
__________________
ChocoTaco369 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 11-15-2015, 11:33 PM   #36
American Legend
 
Drives: 2016 Mustang GT Premium w/ PP
Join Date: Nov 2015
Location: Texas
Posts: 96
Quote:
Originally Posted by bhavyas View Post
Looks are very subjective... So i dont think you should take the opinion of people on that... What may interest you may not interest others and vice versa...

x2. I don't particularly like the long over hang of the Mustang's front end. Seems excessive. BMW has always nailed this dimension.
The Gen6 front over hang looks good (short).
American Legend is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 11-15-2015, 11:56 PM   #37
VF-22
 
Drives: 4 Wheels
Join Date: May 2015
Location: USA
Posts: 150
Quote:
Originally Posted by American Legend View Post
x2. I don't particularly like the long over hang of the Mustang's front end. Seems excessive. BMW has always nailed this dimension.
The Gen6 front over hang looks good (short).
Agreed. The one thing I don't like is how long the front/food feels. Doesn't feel modern, actually feels like my father's '76 Ford Torino. Hood is way too long on the Mustang. I think the GT350 changed that some.

I'm itching to drive an SS to compare. I think the one thing Chevy needs to do is offer the SS with a spoiler delete. Forcing a spoiler on people is just ridiculous.
VF-22 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 11-16-2015, 01:50 AM   #38
Clarkson
 
Drives: 2013 volkswagen tiguan
Join Date: Oct 2015
Location: victoria
Posts: 32
From your experience of test driving the mustang, I can tell that you care about feelings rather than raw numbers in term of performance. And with the fact that you prefer non-pp GT, I would say that the MRC in SS would definitely be a better bet for you as it is not gonna give u a harsh ride but at the same time its not gonna hurt performance.

Manual gearbox of the GT has been the main complaint of its owners.

So get an SS
Clarkson is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 11-16-2015, 02:01 AM   #39
crysalis_01
Iron fist, lead foot
 
crysalis_01's Avatar
 
Drives: 2003 Mustang Cobra
Join Date: Jul 2013
Location: Wyoming
Posts: 1,243
Quote:
Originally Posted by aa406079 View Post
Motor Trend said it BEST

Mustang GT= Grand Tourer
Camaro SS = Super Sport

Mustang is a great cruising car... But it seems if you push it past 7/10ths driving it was found lacking ( in comparison)
This. Pick which suits you more. Although as close as these two are, a few aftemarket parts would quckly delete any deficit either has compared to the other.
__________________
'03 SVT Cobra-SC4.6L V8 || modded with mods'n'stuff
crysalis_01 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 11-16-2015, 02:31 AM   #40
aa406079

 
Drives: New : 2017 SS 1LE Old: 2012 TTRS M6
Join Date: Oct 2015
Location: Calgary/Vancouver
Posts: 810
Quote:
Originally Posted by VF-22 View Post
Agreed. The one thing I don't like is how long the front/food feels. Doesn't feel modern, actually feels like my father's '76 Ford Torino. Hood is way too long on the Mustang. I think the GT350 changed that some.

I'm itching to drive an SS to compare. I think the one thing Chevy needs to do is offer the SS with a spoiler delete. Forcing a spoiler on people is just ridiculous.
THIS

http://i805.photobucket.com/albums/y...ps6ikzpuar.jpg

http://i206.photobucket.com/albums/b...ds/image_4.jpg

the new GM Performance Blade Spoiler is what the SS Camaro should've come with straight from factory....

Last edited by aa406079; 11-16-2015 at 03:07 AM.
aa406079 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 11-16-2015, 05:55 AM   #41
ILBMF
 
Drives: 2011 Camaro SS '06 Mustang GT
Join Date: Nov 2015
Location: Maryland
Posts: 64
I dig that spoiler
ILBMF is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 11-16-2015, 06:19 AM   #42
Zeke.Malvo

 
Zeke.Malvo's Avatar
 
Drives: 1969 Mustang MaCh1
Join Date: Nov 2015
Location: SJ
Posts: 835
Quote:
Originally Posted by aa406079 View Post
THIS

http://i805.photobucket.com/albums/y...ps6ikzpuar.jpg

http://i206.photobucket.com/albums/b...ds/image_4.jpg

the new GM Performance Blade Spoiler is what the SS Camaro should've come with straight from factory....
+1 on that spoiler! The factory spoilers on the mustang aren't too great either. I wonder if the GT350 spoilers look any good in person.
__________________
1969 Pro-Touring MaCh 1 - CHP 427w 10.8 comp - 3140 lbs. - 460 rwhp / 490 rwtq
T56 Magnum || 14" 6 piston front / 13" 4 piston rear Wilwood brakes || Hydraulic clutch || 9" Detroit Locker || TCP Coilovers || Forgeline Wheels 18x10 275/35 front, 19x12 325/30 rear
Zeke.Malvo is offline   Reply With Quote
 
Post Reply


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump


All times are GMT -5. The time now is 11:57 PM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.9 Beta 4
Copyright ©2000 - 2026, vBulletin Solutions, Inc.