|
|
#29 | |
![]() Drives: 2005 Cobalt Base - 5 speed Join Date: Apr 2015
Location: Ohio
Posts: 444
|
Quote:
They made an AWD camaro...? That's weird, doesn't seem right... And then I'm sure I'd love it hahaha |
|
|
|
|
|
|
#30 |
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() Drives: 2013 1LE Join Date: Feb 2012
Location: DMV
Posts: 1,548
|
AWD would still add significant amounts of weight and complexity. Not that it will never come, but I think it will not come before CF and polymers are affordable to keep the same type of price point and weight. If the Camaro adds AWD and moves up to Challenger weight to do so, it defeats the purpose.
__________________
It's a Dingledarm. It's there to dampen side fumbling. If your marzelvanes fumble too much they can cause total protonic reversal. It gets ugly from there. This is really the biggest problem with the new Camaro. That and the tri-pronged blivot.
Delivered 21 Jan 2013 |
|
|
|
|
|
#31 | |
![]() ![]() Drives: Coupeless :( Join Date: Jan 2015
Location: SWFL
Posts: 980
|
Quote:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
#32 |
|
Hail to the King baby!
Drives: '19 XT4 2.0T & '22 VW Atlas 2.0T Join Date: Dec 2008
Location: Illinois
Posts: 12,311
|
If an SS is 3700ish pounds, AWD would put it no more than 3900, far lighter than a Challenger.
Launch would be awesome and even at that weight a performance biased AWD system, i.e. Audi would smoke a Mustang. Look at what a near 4,000 pound Audi RS5 does with less HP and torque than an LT1. Look I have max respect for those hanging on to history and that a Camaro should only be what it ever was. Just suggesting this is an opportunity to lead and run hell bent for the future and redefine What a Pony car is and can be.
__________________
"Speed, it seems to me, provides the one genuinely modern pleasure." - Aldous Huxley
|
|
|
|
|
|
#33 |
![]() ![]() ![]() Drives: 2002 Z/28,1968 Chevelle convert. Join Date: Oct 2010
Location: Phila.,PA
Posts: 1,137
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
#34 |
![]() Drives: 2013 F-150 Join Date: Aug 2014
Location: United States
Posts: 297
|
What would I like to see?
Mmm..... 1) Hover technology 2) Holographic Infotainment system 3) A railgun mounted in the headlights to deal with traffic 4) Transition tint w/ electrochromic color changing frosted glass 5) Automatic hamburger creator |
|
|
|
|
|
#35 |
|
Hail to the King baby!
Drives: '19 XT4 2.0T & '22 VW Atlas 2.0T Join Date: Dec 2008
Location: Illinois
Posts: 12,311
|
4 is doable
__________________
"Speed, it seems to me, provides the one genuinely modern pleasure." - Aldous Huxley
|
|
|
|
|
|
#36 |
![]() Drives: El camino Join Date: Nov 2014
Location: World
Posts: 193
|
LTx with 550hp naturally aspirated.. It will prove once again emmisions wont kill off the pushrod technology.
1LE option from the start. Lower base weight. Recaro seats or equivalent as an option |
|
|
|
|
|
#37 |
![]() ![]() Drives: Coupeless :( Join Date: Jan 2015
Location: SWFL
Posts: 980
|
For number 4, there's already a tint available that gets darker when hit by direct sunlight, and lightens up when in the shade or at night. Its called PhotoSync.
|
|
|
|
|
|
#38 |
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() Drives: 2018 1SS M6 Join Date: Nov 2014
Location: Houston
Posts: 2,617
|
About number three, wouldn't that just create bigger traffic jam, disabling the car in front of you? How about this...Mylink has a hacking app that hacks into their ecm and with it you can speed them up, or move them over so you can get past them? That would be fun.
|
|
|
|
|
|
#39 |
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() Drives: 2013 1LE Join Date: Feb 2012
Location: DMV
Posts: 1,548
|
PURE speculation. fun
Deleted
__________________
It's a Dingledarm. It's there to dampen side fumbling. If your marzelvanes fumble too much they can cause total protonic reversal. It gets ugly from there. This is really the biggest problem with the new Camaro. That and the tri-pronged blivot.
Delivered 21 Jan 2013 Last edited by newb; 04-13-2015 at 04:43 AM. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Post Reply
|
|
|